Starcraft Mafia -- Game Over!


User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4350 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:47 am

Post by the worst »

In post 4347, AlmostNancy wrote:So none of your roleblocks could have been redirected, because you would have been informed, in that case?
can you explain what you mean by this?
i think nauci is saying her night actions ~did nothing~ n1 + n2 because she was roleblocked
but she was also targeted by the witch n2
but the witch ability failed because she was roleblocked, so she couldn't go wherever the witch sent her
User avatar
Nauci
Nauci
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Nauci
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3631
Joined: October 10, 2017

Post Post #4351 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:47 am

Post by Nauci »

In post 4341, AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4334, Nauci wrote:
In post 4329, AlmostNancy wrote:Witch=Survivor
Witch =/= survivor

The witch only wins if it survives
and town lost
. Plus
it has a redirect ability that the redirected player is informed was used
. It is an explicitly anti-town role without direct killing power. It said it'd also appear as town to cops but I'm not sure if that applies in Krazy's version. It's a very complex role.
So, either one or both of your roleblocks could have been redirected by the witch to you?
No

The witch could not have directed a roleblock onto me; the witch redirected my night action onto <target unknown>

My night action failed due to a separate cause

I really didn't fucking want to claim anything :/ :/ :/

Almost as much as I wanted to finally play a game as vanilla town

Skitter I'm so jealous
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4352 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:50 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4348, the worst wrote:i'm fine with that

kokichi should claim whenever unless there's like..things keyser or performer have omitted
Neither of their claims make any sense in this setup, because of no guns groupscum/Zergs and especially because of witch.

Maybe Performer is the witch?
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4353 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:50 am

Post by the worst »

i don't have any opinion one way or the other wrt perf being the witch
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4354 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:51 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4350, the worst wrote:
In post 4347, AlmostNancy wrote:So none of your roleblocks could have been redirected, because you would have been informed, in that case?
can you explain what you mean by this?
i think nauci is saying her night actions ~did nothing~ n1 + n2 because she was roleblocked
but she was also targeted by the witch n2
but the witch ability failed because she was roleblocked, so she couldn't go wherever the witch sent her
Oh but wouldn’t that be a rolestop then, not a roleblock?
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
Nauci
Nauci
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Nauci
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 3631
Joined: October 10, 2017

Post Post #4355 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:51 am

Post by Nauci »

IMO,
if there is a town vigilante still in this game and you were witched, you need to claim.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4356 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:52 am

Post by the worst »

i'm not sure why performer's claim doesn't make sense with the witch either?
AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4350, the worst wrote:
In post 4347, AlmostNancy wrote:So none of your roleblocks could have been redirected, because you would have been informed, in that case?
can you explain what you mean by this?
i think nauci is saying her night actions ~did nothing~ n1 + n2 because she was roleblocked
but she was also targeted by the witch n2
but the witch ability failed because she was roleblocked, so she couldn't go wherever the witch sent her
Oh but wouldn’t that be a rolestop then, not a roleblock?
?
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4357 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:52 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4350, the worst wrote:
In post 4347, AlmostNancy wrote:So none of your roleblocks could have been redirected, because you would have been informed, in that case?
can you explain what you mean by this?
i think nauci is saying her night actions ~did nothing~ n1 + n2 because she was roleblocked
but she was also targeted by the witch n2
but the witch ability failed because she was roleblocked, so she couldn't go wherever the witch sent her
I obviously misunderstood. :lol:
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4358 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:52 am

Post by the worst »

no rolestopper like, applies the ascetic modifier to their target basically
(it's a little different but that's an easier way to explain it)

definitely roleblocker
User avatar
Keyser Söze
Keyser Söze
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Keyser Söze
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6064
Joined: May 11, 2015

Post Post #4359 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:53 am

Post by Keyser Söze »

In post 4282, Mitillos wrote:Hello, everyone.

VOTE: Kokichi

First he's an IC, then he's a D2 IC, then he's an N2 IC, then he's an N2 IC who might not show up immediately on N2, then he's still not confirmed on D3. This shit ends here.
This. No more shit.

I view Kokis play as selfish and self-preserving (something I wouldn’t associate with TOWN)
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4360 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:54 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4351, Nauci wrote:
In post 4341, AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4334, Nauci wrote:
In post 4329, AlmostNancy wrote:Witch=Survivor
Witch =/= survivor

The witch only wins if it survives
and town lost
. Plus
it has a redirect ability that the redirected player is informed was used
. It is an explicitly anti-town role without direct killing power. It said it'd also appear as town to cops but I'm not sure if that applies in Krazy's version. It's a very complex role.
So, either one or both of your roleblocks could have been redirected by the witch to you?
No

The witch could not have directed a roleblock onto me; the witch redirected my night action onto <target unknown>

My night action failed due to a separate cause

I really didn't fucking want to claim anything :/ :/ :/

Almost as much as I wanted to finally play a game as vanilla town

Skitter I'm so jealous
So the witch redirected your NA but it was unsuccessful, because it failed, for whatever reason.

I’m just trying to make some sense of what the hell is going on here.
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4361 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:55 am

Post by the worst »

In post 4360, AlmostNancy wrote:I’m just trying to make some sense of what the hell is going on here.
QFT but atm we're solving a 100 piece jigsaw and we only have the corner pieces
let's leave this convo until we have more claims. i think some serious fuckery is happening
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4362 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:56 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4356, the worst wrote:i'm not sure why performer's claim doesn't make sense with the witch either?
AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4350, the worst wrote:
In post 4347, AlmostNancy wrote:So none of your roleblocks could have been redirected, because you would have been informed, in that case?
can you explain what you mean by this?
i think nauci is saying her night actions ~did nothing~ n1 + n2 because she was roleblocked
but she was also targeted by the witch n2
but the witch ability failed because she was roleblocked, so she couldn't go wherever the witch sent her
Oh but wouldn’t that be a rolestop then, not a roleblock?
?
I thought a rolestop would block the witch’s actions towards her?
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4363 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:57 am

Post by the worst »

In post 4362, AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4356, the worst wrote:i'm not sure why performer's claim doesn't make sense with the witch either?
AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4350, the worst wrote:
In post 4347, AlmostNancy wrote:So none of your roleblocks could have been redirected, because you would have been informed, in that case?
can you explain what you mean by this?
i think nauci is saying her night actions ~did nothing~ n1 + n2 because she was roleblocked
but she was also targeted by the witch n2
but the witch ability failed because she was roleblocked, so she couldn't go wherever the witch sent her
Oh but wouldn’t that be a rolestop then, not a roleblock?
?
I thought a rolestop would block the witch’s actions towards her?
it would but then she shouldn't be informed she was witched n2, because she wouldn't have been
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4364 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:57 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4358, the worst wrote:no rolestopper like, applies the ascetic modifier to their target basically
(it's a little different but that's an easier way to explain it)

definitely roleblocker
Okay. This game is so confusing. :lol:
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4365 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:00 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4363, the worst wrote:
In post 4362, AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4356, the worst wrote:i'm not sure why performer's claim doesn't make sense with the witch either?
AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4350, the worst wrote:
In post 4347, AlmostNancy wrote:So none of your roleblocks could have been redirected, because you would have been informed, in that case?
can you explain what you mean by this?
i think nauci is saying her night actions ~did nothing~ n1 + n2 because she was roleblocked
but she was also targeted by the witch n2
but the witch ability failed because she was roleblocked, so she couldn't go wherever the witch sent her
Oh but wouldn’t that be a rolestop then, not a roleblock?
?
I thought a rolestop would block the witch’s actions towards her?
it would but then she shouldn't be informed she was witched n2, because she wouldn't have been
So she was witched but roleblocked but she wasn’t informed that either or her roleblocks happened, as a result of the witch’s redirect.

I wonder if Krazy is good at calculus. :P
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4366 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:02 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4359, Keyser Söze wrote:
In post 4282, Mitillos wrote:Hello, everyone.

VOTE: Kokichi

First he's an IC, then he's a D2 IC, then he's an N2 IC, then he's an N2 IC who might not show up immediately on N2, then he's still not confirmed on D3. This shit ends here.
This. No more shit.

I view Kokis play as selfish and self-preserving (something I wouldn’t associate with TOWN)
You claimed a role that makes 0 sense in this setup. You need to claim your true role, if you don’t want to get lynched.
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4367 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:04 am

Post by the worst »

so nauci has a power role of some kind

on night one, she targeted someone but it didn't work. => she was roleblocked. she was not witched.
on night two, she targeted someone but it didn't work. she was also informed she was witched. => she was roleblocked and witched.

the witch targeting someone does two things:-
1. changes the witch's target's target, i.e. Nauci.
2. informs the witch's target that they were controlled by the witch.

because someone roleblocked Nauci (stopped her from moving that night) on night two, nauci couldn't have a target at all so (1) above didn't happen. only (2) did, because the WITCH'S ability went through. it's just that NAUCI'S didn't.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4368 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:04 am

Post by the worst »

we should probably EOD Nauci's claim until after Kokichi, at least
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4369 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:08 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4367, the worst wrote:so nauci has a power role of some kind

on night one, she targeted someone but it didn't work. => she was roleblocked. she was not witched.
on night two, she targeted someone but it didn't work. she was also informed she was witched. => she was roleblocked and witched.

the witch targeting someone does two things:-
1. changes the witch's target's target, i.e. Nauci.
2. informs the witch's target that they were controlled by the witch.

because someone roleblocked Nauci (stopped her from moving that night) on night two, nauci couldn't have a target at all so (1) above didn't happen. only (2) did, because the WITCH'S ability went through. it's just that NAUCI'S didn't.
So, did the roleblock actually protect her from the anti-town witch? Because that would then be a good thing? Like, could the roleblock, could have possibly protected Nauci and prevented a 2nd kill or am I way offbase again?
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4370 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:10 am

Post by the worst »

yes, it did. i'd be kinda surprised if it was a town motivated rb tho
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4371 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:12 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4368, the worst wrote:we should probably EOD Nauci's claim until after Kokichi, at least
I don’t like how Keyser is just completely ignoring our concerns with his bogus role and trying to move the focus off of him onto Kokichi. If he was town here, he would be trying to explain his REAL role, not pull a bait and switch.
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4372 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:14 am

Post by the worst »

In post 4371, AlmostNancy wrote:
In post 4368, the worst wrote:we should probably EOD Nauci's claim until after Kokichi, at least
I don’t like how Keyser is just completely ignoring our concerns with his bogus role and trying to move the focus off of him onto Kokichi. If he was town here, he would be trying to explain his REAL role, not pull a bait and switch.
i don't disagree with this at all
User avatar
AlmostNancy
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
AlmostNancy
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1033
Joined: December 2, 2018

Post Post #4373 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:15 am

Post by AlmostNancy »

In post 4370, the worst wrote:yes, it did. i'd be kinda surprised if it was a town motivated rb tho
But if the roleblock saved Nauci’s life, then it still helped town. Well, there isn’t any fully informed faction with a survivor/witch in the mix, so neither town nor scum would have been aware of its existence.
Hydra of Almost50 and Nancy Drew 39


We don’t intend to monkey around.
User avatar
the worst
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
User avatar
User avatar
the worst
Snuggly Duckling
Snuggly Duckling
Posts: 36887
Joined: November 7, 2015
Location: pond

Post Post #4374 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2018 2:16 am

Post by the worst »

it didn't save nauci's life probably
it just saved her from being controlled by the witch

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”