yeah don't hammer yet, we got time, I want some updates from CsBlastoise
chennisden with another quantum simultaneous town/scum post... if noodle flips scum I sorta see that as a town L-1 but if she's a mislynch then that's a real bad looking hop on
In post 441, chennisden wrote:And you have no idea who to lynch probably because you are scum looking for an easy mislynch at this point.
chennisden, wouldn't you say you were the easy mislynch? why does scum!screaming noodle indicate a scumread on you yet fail to vote you or continue to pressure you at any point today?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
kind of want to hear from Thespio prior to hammer, but am also okay with hammer lol
What would you like to know? I have white underwear on, my middle name is William, and I once plugged a wireless mouse into a professors laptop to screw with them.
In post 441, chennisden wrote:Let her claim! And if she's town, let her give her input before she's lynched! (If shes scum said input might also be helpful.)
Saying this for the second time this game, now bolded for emphasis
No one should claim anything until someone gives intent to hammer
kind of want to hear from Thespio prior to hammer, but am also okay with hammer lol
What would you like to know? I have white underwear on, my middle name is William, and I once plugged a wireless mouse into a professors laptop to screw with them.
Well, there is a wagon at L-1 and TTTT has given intent to hammer. Perhaps you could give your read on Screaming noodle, and your thoughts on the wagon?
Pretty funny joke with the professor, lol. We used to flip the top mirror on the overhead projector down so that it wouldn't project and see how long the teacher would take to notice, but I'm showing my age.
In post 457, chennisden wrote:and whoever said that there is at most 1 scum on the wagon, then that means there is at least 1 off
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
I dont have a solid scum read, the way I see it though is that its VERY unlikely that we have both newbscum, with 4 SEs, I would be willing to bet there is atleast 1, so the NC is likely legit.
In post 422, Screamingnoodle wrote:I don't have an aversion to this at all... Have you seen my posts today? Yes, I guess I should be more on the offensive rather that the defensive. It's certainly a better strategy. I guess I just post the first thing that comes to my head and I tend to be on the defense as is my personality.
So I'll point fingers with no basis, and you can do the same and we are suppose to magically come to the same conclusion? Cool.
I feel you're misrepping here, or trying to make my argument look bad
it's not a simple matter of offensive/defensive, you can be active and involved without being too aggressive. I'd categorize it more as engaged/disengaged. Engaged people are proactively commenting on stuff, bringing new thoughts/ideas to the table, demonstrating that they are trying to generate information and using information they've gained to inform their reads. disengaged people are floating in the thread and not making an impact, don't seem to particularly care who gets voted/wagoned, don't seem to care if people disagree/ignore their posts. I would categorize your ISO so far as disengaged and would be surprised if you disagree with me.
also what makes you say "no basis". I've given reasons for nearly all of my votes/reads and put a lot of thought into many of my posts - yes oftentimes it is my interpretation and not grounded in 100% solid empirical fact, but it still constitutes a "basis" for where and why I'm pointing fingers.
also you didn't answer my question about what you think would actually constitute a "good" reason or actual "information" to vote/scumread someone.
right now just suuuuuuuuper newbie, like I said, there is likely an SE scum, so the people I think we should look at is chen's wagon, newbie, that are lurking/overly active. Thats my 2 cents at this point. I do think we shouldnt push someone to l-1 and back off before they post though. so the flip here seems odd.
In post 472, Thespio wrote:right now just suuuuuuuuper newbie, like I said, there is likely an SE scum, so the people I think we should look at is chen's wagon, newbie, that are lurking/overly active. Thats my 2 cents at this point. I do think we shouldnt push someone to l-1 and back off before they post though. so the flip here seems odd.
You don't think the comment implies a scum perspective? Why does it imply a newb!town perspective?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"