Greatest Idea Mafia - Game Over

Vedith · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:02 pm

In post 1247, ofrhz wrote:Oka why are you voting for DT?

Because Oka is Scum or going to unintentionally help Scum.

OkaPoka · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:03 pm

if u really think that people are going to follow me onto dt then you are insane

Vedith · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:05 pm

So you admit that your vote us in vain and useless?
What are you bringing to the game this day then?

OkaPoka · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:07 pm

ill comment after gamma confirms whether he has a cop guilty on me or not

Vedith · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:08 pm

Gamma would have been more vocal.
I should go down the blah blah you're worried about a guilty on you but it's you...

OkaPoka · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:13 pm

can you just explain how you have a full clear on dt

l

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:16 pm

In post 1096, OkaPoka wrote:He pretty clearly doesn't.

Gamma confirm?

Why do you think I don't?

OkaPoka · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:17 pm

my role cant incriminate me in any way

OkaPoka · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:18 pm

this would be a lot simpler if you just said yes i have x on oka or no i dont

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:20 pm

In post 1113, DoubtingThomas wrote:i dont give a shit if you prefer town or your mom prefers scum. it doesn't matter what you prefer. maybe you wanted to scum because you haven't scummed in a while and wants to push the "i prefer town" narrative.

let's stop talking about worthless things

This post is very good
Meta can be manipulated. Preference can be manipulated.
@Oka poor answer. Had you given a specific post that made you think that I'd have given you credit for your eye for that sort of thing.
And no, no guilty on Oka. Just a fairly solid read.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:21 pm

In post 1117, Elsa Jay wrote:"No Result" is what I specifically got.

Yeah that's a little too specific

OkaPoka · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:21 pm

k cool

OkaPoka · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:22 pm

i thought you were taking a page out of my c9++ book but as scum

OkaPoka · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:22 pm

why are elsa and pint voting together?

OkaPoka · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:23 pm

Why is Elsa insistent on multiball theory and believes scum shot survivor? Pretty obv to me that its a town motivated kill.

OkaPoka · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:36 pm

elsa case on pint:

"he's asking to be lynched"
"he must've roleblocked me or something!"
"i dont think he got vanilla'd"

also pint is discrediting the idea that vig killed survivor

In post 854, pinturicchio wrote:Oh yeah a bunch of things could've happened. What I mean is that I don't think the kill was made by a vig

which is interesting that they are in agreement here

and on masons

also pint's case on elsa seems to be
"doesn't believe my claim and vanilla'd me"

these are shit cases
they've been sitting on them for a very long time
and the pushes are weak, and startling only relevant to themselves. literally non applicable for everyone else
svs

VOTE: pint

OkaPoka · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:38 pm

elsa should give out her other card

OkaPoka · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:41 pm

more importantly they scumread each other and they arent the least bit worried they arent voting together which is not indicative on normal town paranoia

TTTT · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:36 am

In post 1241, ofrhz wrote:The tl;dr is that I would really like to vote in {Allo, TGP} today.

I agree
VOTE: TGP

TTTT · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:37 am

In post 1264, OkaPoka wrote:Why is Elsa insistent on multiball theory and believes scum shot survivor? Pretty obv to me that its a town motivated kill.

I agree

TTTT · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Tue Feb 26, 2019 12:38 am

I think Oka is town

Elsa Jay · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Tue Feb 26, 2019 2:31 am

In post 1266, OkaPoka wrote:elsa should give out her other card

I already gave out my damn ability. My other card is irrelevant at the moment. I'll only say it wasn't a second VT card but also a PR. Not outting which card is out of play.

Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1117, Elsa Jay wrote:"No Result" is what I specifically got.
Yeah that's a little too specific

Working with what I got and helping town by saying I got roleblocked. Or something was on Spam that stopped me from seeing who did the kill.

TTTT wrote:
In post 1264, OkaPoka wrote:Why is Elsa insistent on multiball theory and believes scum shot survivor? Pretty obv to me that its a town motivated kill.
I agree

You can't see Oka is the one who did the fucking kill and wants to claim the Vigi shot? Okay then.

brassherald · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Tue Feb 26, 2019 3:08 am

In post 1271, Elsa Jay wrote:You can't see Oka is the one who did the fucking kill and wants to claim the Vigi shot? Okay then.

Where did he do this?

Elsa Jay · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Tue Feb 26, 2019 3:13 am

Have you not seen how hard he's been going on the "There's no scum motivation for the Spam kill" and shenanigans? Honestly if I see it everyone elsa probably could as well.

He's defending the point of the kill so he can claim vigilante later. Simple enough. Hell, (and don't even think of claiming this Oka) if he's an Alien, claiming 1-shot Vigilante holds a crap ton of weight since they only get 1 kill anyway.

brassherald · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Tue Feb 26, 2019 3:17 am

In post 1273, Elsa Jay wrote:Have you not seen how hard he's been going on the "There's no scum motivation for the Spam kill" and shenanigans? Honestly if I see it everyone elsa probably could as well.

He's defending the point of the kill so he can claim vigilante later. Simple enough. Hell, (and don't even think of claiming this Oka) if he's an Alien, claiming 1-shot Vigilante holds a crap ton of weight since they only get 1 kill anyway.

But, I also said that I saw no scum motivation to the kill... Though, I've already claimed not vig, so I guess that does not hold water for me, specifically.