@teacherIn post 304, TTTT wrote:lynchpool:
Clarity
Noodle
ASC
Sash
those top two should be priority wagons/sorts rn
to what extent do you agree with this pool?
@teacherIn post 304, TTTT wrote:lynchpool:
Clarity
Noodle
ASC
Sash
those top two should be priority wagons/sorts rn
@SchiavIn post 326, TTTT wrote:zeebu (2) - wilky, Schiavetto
@ZeebuIn post 326, TTTT wrote:TTTT (2) - zeebu, ClearlyClairty
@teacherIn post 200, ClearlyClarity wrote:That's true — no matter what alignment TTTT is, he gets towncred for opposing your lynch. Do you read him as scum or town, then?In post 184, zeebu wrote:even though tttt had been the loudest voice in my favor, i think he also stands the most to gain if i am mislynched on day 1
i sort of assumed others would start to hop on the votes once everyone started finding you on the scummier end of their totem poles.In post 329, TTTT wrote:@ZeebuIn post 326, TTTT wrote:TTTT (2) - zeebu, ClearlyClairty
your vote on me is from 118 (reasons given in 117)
but you never try to push my lynch directly
215 was weird coming from town who isn't really pushing his SR
in 238 you say you are "sensing some distancing between clarity and tttt"
other than that nothing pushing others to vote for me
or any re-evaluations of your read on me
like I've posted a billion times this game but you aren't replying to me like you think I'm scum
Pretty good. As you know, I would add one and change the order, but I I think my own views right now are less important than momentum, given the deadline and Gamestayed and weekend.In post 325, TTTT wrote:@teacherIn post 304, TTTT wrote:lynchpool:
Clarity
Noodle
ASC
Sash
those top two should be priority wagons/sorts rn
to what extent do you agree with this pool?
Not confident in any of my scum reads at the moment. I know I
I agree RE: Sasha, the play reminds me very much of me in my scumgame. Admittedly I'm not playing too differently to that atm but hopefully I'll improve as the game continues.In post 247, JPD wrote:Aight, some real life stuff overran and I only just got home. Gonna spend an hour on here before I head to bed. I'll try to make my way through all that's been posted since I've been gone.
I'll answer Shiavetto's question first.
My read on Sasha isn't a particularly strong one, certainly not something I'd consider lynching him over at the moment but that could change.In post 189, Schiavetto wrote: If you had to build a counterwagon against zeebu, on a player other than the one you're currently lynching, who would it be? Please provide two details to support your thinking, and remember to explain your reasoning.
1)Sasha hasn't done any active scum hunting. Of his 38 posts he has asked only two questions (47 and 96) neither of which I would consider helpful for scumhunting. His other posts have reiterated something someone else has already said (43, 67, 68, 138, 176 and 216).
2)He said in post 84 that he thought the scum was in the pool of lurkers. This feels like an excuse to not bother scumhunting, especially given he hadn't even made an attempt to pressure the active players before declaring this.
3)His logic for jumping on the Zeebu bandwagon is inconsistent. When I pressured him on it he mentioned as special 'something' that he can't talk about. I'm not a fan of this. It derails discussion as suddenly we can't ask him (or anyone else who talks about the 'something') any questions about something they've done which was kind of suspect. He jumped on the bandwagon due to post 129 which he described as "strong" but wasn't in my opnion. This 'something' better be bloody good for him to suddenly change his mind. Evidence
4)He is very reluctant to share any information. He posted his reads list 69 and Teacher and I both had to prod to twice to get him to share his reasoning (70 and 72, 79 and 81). Even then his reasoning was either week, or still not revealed fully. It feels like he posted his reads and had to come up with reasons after the fact. This 'something' is another example of that.
Some of this is a bit of a stretch, or could just be interpeted differently but I think Sasha would be my best candidate for a lynch right now (if I wanted to lynch someone right now, which I don't). Possibly TTTT as an alternative but I don't have reasons for that beyond his play seeming off when compared to my metadive. I'll look into that a bit more and see if I can put the feeling in to words.
England, GMT+1In post 275, TTTT wrote:this game is way too inactive...
so plz answer a couple questions:
what time zone do you live in?
when are you most likely to be active?
do you usually phone post or computer post?
For people who read or were in my previous game, this is the same group that I knew Zeito from.In post 305, Schiavetto wrote:ZoL & I mod the same chat-based maf community, of which TheASC is a member
For the most part I agree with this. Teacher, zeebu and JPD are my strongest trs currently.In post 304, TTTT wrote:lynchpool:
Clarity
Noodle
ASC
Sash
those top two should be priority wagons/sorts rn
In post 55, ZestOfLife wrote:Ah I missed gamestart I blame timezones
Reading through the game gives me conflicting thoughts in my head. I am seeing ASC either being paranoid town or him trying to make himself look townie (Schia mentions this in his 39).
I just don't understand the people who oppose L-1 early game, is it bad to pressure someone this way?
In post 145, Sashaddin wrote:I'm growing wary of one of the people on the wagon. It might not be 100% town. I know an all-town rarely happens anyways... but ...In post 142, TTTT wrote:why do you dislike the wagon
I might have some free time at work to check this out further, I will have a clearer head than yesterday evening.
In post 218, Sashaddin wrote:Me too, but right now I'm not having theIn post 202, ClearlyClarity wrote:Don't want to derail whatever this is, but fwiw I'm townreading both of you and I'm excited to see what answers would come from this.somethingI was waiting for so far. Which means my guesses might have been wrong...
So my 'something' was me suspecting Zest would jump off the wagon. Unfortunately, he replaced immediately after so I couldn't verify if his logic was consistent. I thought the replacement would maybe take this path too, but it hasn't happened that way.In post 332, zeebu wrote:In post 329, TTTT wrote:@ZeebuIn post 326, TTTT wrote:TTTT (2) - zeebu, ClearlyClairty
your vote on me is from 118 (reasons given in 117)
but you never try to push my lynch directly
215 was weird coming from town who isn't really pushing his SR
in 238 you say you are "sensing some distancing between clarity and tttt"
other than that nothing pushing others to vote for me
or any re-evaluations of your read on me
like I've posted a billion times this game but you aren't replying to me like you think I'm scum
sasha hasnt done anything of substance since unvoting me and even then still holding on to the cryptic response. i think he needs to spill the beans since it can only help town at this point.[/url] had a 'pissed off' vibe to it.
so far i havent found anything particularly scummy about jpd and teacher. JPDs has had a vote on sash for a while and teacher just threw a vote on wilky for a push for activity i guess.
Can we know what was related to me and wagon now?In post 181, Sashaddin wrote:In post 180, teacher wrote:I think Sasha and I have the same thing we are waitingon Zeebu's wagon to see. If Im right, that would go along way to answering JPD's case on Sasha for me. But I agreeit cant be discussed at the moment.
Zeebu for pressure.In post 337, TheASC wrote:Not confident in any of my scum reads at the moment. I know I should vote someone for pressure, but I'm struggling to decide who to go for and feel like I need a large amount of evidence/reasoning before I feel comfortable voting now that we're out of RVS.
What do you think towny about Zeebu?In post 337, TheASC wrote:For the most part I agree with this. Teacher, zeebu and JPD are my strongest trs currently.
In post 342, Sashaddin wrote:What do you think towny about Zeebu?In post 337, TheASC wrote:For the most part I agree with this. Teacher, zeebu and JPD are my strongest trs currently.
In post 182, zeebu wrote:is it something that i am supposed to do or someone else?
In post 215, zeebu wrote:is it fair to say that the general consensus is that one of either tttt or i are likely to be scum?
He reacted well despite spending multiple real life days at L-1 and has been constantly asking questions to advance the state of the game, as well as his knowledge of the game, since he subbed in.In post 238, zeebu wrote:alright, now im sensing some distancing between clarity and tttt. something about their interactions, unless just retaliatory, hit a chord with me. im still safely under the gun at the moment, so a vote on tttt is certainly a safe move and doubles as allowing cc to get a vote down (as asc pointed out) with little consequence since it doesnt really do anything for the game.
a. He was never my top scumread, though I see how you could have gotten that impression.In post 328, TTTT wrote:@SchiavIn post 326, TTTT wrote:zeebu (2) - wilky, Schiavetto
is this still your top Scumread?a
you voted Zeebu in 106
but haven't pushed Zeebu at all
or advocated for that lynch
in fact, you interacted twice with Zeebu (107 & 188) in ways that don't look like you SR him
then asked everyone who wasn't voting Zeebu to make a case on their preferred counterwagon (189) ???
then haven't said anything about Zeebu since
while starting to latch on others' low-key shade on meb
if you flip scum it looks like Zeebu is your partnerc
who was your top SR during the time you were voting zeebuIn post 345, Schiavetto wrote:He was never my top scumread, though I see how you could have gotten that impression.
I expect suspicion about my playIn post 345, Schiavetto wrote:Is it too much to imagine, though, that multiple people could arrive at the opinion that your gameplay's been sus w/o one of those people being scum manufacturing a read? o: