Micro 865: Let’s Talk About an Ongoing Game [Game Over]

Clemency · Post Post #25 (ISO) » Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:11 pm

i dont vote for people on rvs nowadays because everyone else does it for me anyway
i just like establishing myself

YyottaCat · Post Post #26 (ISO) » Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:19 pm

Sorry I'm late

YyottaCat · Post Post #27 (ISO) » Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:28 pm

Because that loks like an excuse(#25)……………VOTE: Clemency

Clemency · Post Post #28 (ISO) » Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:18 pm

an excuse for what lol

Clemency · Post Post #29 (ISO) » Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:19 pm

hey discussion thread
you smell lol

YyottaCat · Post Post #30 (ISO) » Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:21 pm

In post 28, Clemency wrote:an excuse for what lol

Guess.

Clemency · Post Post #31 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:12 am

what possible motivation could i have to "explain" away an rvs statement and how in any way could it be alignment indicative

Clemency · Post Post #32 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:13 am

VOTE: yyotta

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #33 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:53 am

In post 30, Creature wrote:
In post 20, Creature wrote:Hopefully NMSA doesn't throw the game again.
Was just kidding about this ^_^

Don't worry, I can tell. (:

TheBrie · Post Post #34 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 2:55 am

@Buki I think i played with Fumuki. Red Flag, about a year ago. I was scum lynched first day. Can't actually remember how you played.

Clemency could be construed as being defensive. I can't remember how Clemency plays though. Anyway, I prefer it when people do engage in RVS, so it was as good a reason as any for voting. Better than voting Ausuka for the reads lists. (Do I get in the next one?)

It's funny to see the wildly different reads in the discussion thread. They're probably unbiased, but also not subject to in game pressure, so they don't have to temper anything or be serious.
Compare Mastina and Korina.

TheBrie · Post Post #35 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 2:55 am

In post 36, mastina wrote:
In post 17, TheBrie wrote:
In post 6, podoboq wrote:
In post 4, Buki wrote:there's some new faces here
The only players I have any experience with in here are TemporalLich, Umlaut, and TheBrie.
Long ago experience. Unless you have an alt I don't know about. But it was one of my best games.
Clemency only said Howdy.
VOTE: Clemency
Off to work now. Much work.
Town, but going to be mislynched before the end of the game.

Thanks, but I actually don't get mislynched. (An alt was taken out by a vig, but that doesn't count)

DrDolittle · Post Post #36 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 3:41 am

Looking for a Replacement for Umlaut

podoboq · Post Post #37 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 3:49 am

In post 21, TemporalLich wrote:NAIlean: podoboq (was mainly SRed for 6 which is unfair)
Scumlean: Ausuka (15 is forced AF)

This is weird to me. I don't think I was "mainly scumread". From where I'm standing Ausuka made a super forced, jokey post trying to play Sherlock Holmes. I don't think she was being serious. So I don't see anybody scumreading me, and even if anybody was, it was just Ausuka.

Like, I just don't see what you're seeing here. Are you just saying stuff to say stuff? You know you don't need a color coded read list with parenthesized thoughts on page one, right?

podoboq · Post Post #38 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 3:54 am

In post 24, Korina wrote:
In post 6, podoboq wrote:
In post 4, Buki wrote:there's some new faces here
The only players I have any experience with in here are TemporalLich, Umlaut, and TheBrie.
What does this mean for the people in the game/us in the discussion thread?

Meta. It informs how I read certain people. I see people rely on metagame a lot of the time here, and it's just something I don't do, because I don't play enough with people to have the ability to do it. I like to clarify that at the start, because it has a tendency to make me an odd one out.

ISO · Post Post #39 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:08 am

In post 37, podoboq wrote:This is weird to me. I don't think I was "mainly scumread". From where I'm standing Ausuka made a super forced, jokey post trying to play Sherlock Holmes. I don't think she was being serious. So I don't see anybody scumreading me, and even if anybody was, it was just Ausuka.

Oh alright, it was a random stage readlist so it was best to take it with a bucket of salt.

I currently TR you in light of this, and Ausuka needs to explain her SR of you.

In post 37, podoboq wrote:Like, I just don't see what you're seeing here. Are you just saying stuff to say stuff? You know you don't need a color coded read list with parenthesized thoughts on page one, right?

Buki is pretty intent on a pseudo-RQS, and to answer his question TheBrie's vote seems less trustworthy than a naked RVS vote with the pseudo-explanation of "Clemency only said Howdy."

Clemency's RVS non-vote doesn't seem scummy or towny to me. 31 is how I feel.

Ausuka has no new posts beyond 15, and I agree with your sentiment on her.

Asides from my answer to Buki's question being a point against TheBrie, the rest of her ISO is pretty much "I don't get mislynched"

ISO · Post Post #40 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:18 am

In post 21, TemporalLich wrote:Alright that makes sense I guess.

Shotgun Readlist (don't trust this as we're still in the random stage)

Townlean
: Buki (town leader-esque in 16)

NAIlean
: Clemency (13 isn't even a RVS vote), podoboq (was mainly SRed for 6 which is unfair)

Scumlean
: Ausuka (15 is forced AF), TheBrie (13 isn't that scummy which makes 17 look scummy)

The rest are neutral of course.

1) why is trying to lead the town towny?
2) what is a NAIlean?
3) why is that post being forced scummy?

ISO · Post Post #41 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:19 am

In post 27, YyottaCat wrote:Because that loks like an excuse(#25)……………VOTE: Clemency

This looks so transparently scummy that I think it's probably town.

ISO · Post Post #42 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:21 am

In post 34, TheBrie wrote:Clemency could be construed as being defensive.

I don't get what this means really. "could be construed" as being defensive? Do you believe it or not?

Also I get what Clemency is saying and I don't think his pov is scummy at all.

ISO · Post Post #43 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:23 am

In post 37, podoboq wrote:From where I'm standing Ausuka made a super forced, jokey post trying to play Sherlock Holmes. I don't think she was being serious.

Yeah this is correct. I did think the conversation about who had experience with who was extremely boring and had next to no chance of catching scum and as podo started that I thought he was slightly scummy but only a little bit >rand. None of my trs at that point were genuine though.

ISO · Post Post #44 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:23 am

Also podo is probably town.

UNVOTE:

ISO · Post Post #45 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:24 am

VOTE: Brie

podoboq · Post Post #46 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:29 am

In post 39, TemporalLich wrote:Ausuka needs to explain her SR of you.

In post 39, TemporalLich wrote:Ausuka has no new posts beyond 15, and I agree with your sentiment on her.

My sentiment on Ausuka is that she wasn't scumreading me at all. So these two comments contradict each other.

ISO · Post Post #47 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:46 am

On a different note, Yyotta's ISO is just her scumreading Clemency for no good reason.

That's why my vote is still on Yyotta.

Buki · Post Post #48 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:54 am

It's not really no reason but yeah, kind of a slippery rope.

VOTE: NMSA

I think this is the true most scum equity slot right now, he came to the thread and even with all this early discussion he simply goes off to make a fluff post

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #49 (ISO) » Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:17 am

In post 48, Buki wrote:It's not really no reason but yeah, kind of a slippery rope.

VOTE: NMSA

I think this is the true most scum equity slot right now, he came to the thread and even with all this early discussion he simply goes off to make a fluff post

"early discussion" not really, there was only a handful of things to comment on last I checked, none of which were consequential enough to warrant attention. Also VOTE: Ausuka this is not RVS.