![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
VOTE: Clemency
PEDIT what
Clemency has had time to post. What do you say now?In post 306, Montosh wrote:Also I'm willing to give the Clemency slot some time to post and such. RAS was doing a fair bit of flailing but I could see it coming from town too.
I don't feel it's entirely the same though. Titus appears to be posting to appear active while saying comparatively little despite being in the game since it started. Clemency doesn't appear to be doing that. They just seem to be lurking more, and RAS was contributing in what I thought was good faith despite the way they exited later.In post 575, ConManMick wrote:You know what? I'm going on Clemency. I dislike RAS' out. I don't think comparisons to Nancy's exit are in good faith. I don't see anything in Clemency's posts that screams town. I see some filler posting (which you guys have a problem with from Titus) and I see a VERY convenient "oh I guess the lurkers are scum" list. And I don't like that this is being gotten away with.
VOTE: Clemency
PEDIT what
I could see Clemency's lurking coming from town. I think lurking is scummy but I think Titus' active lurking is more scummy.ConManMick wrote:Clemency has had time to post. What do you say now?In post 306, Montosh wrote:Also I'm willing to give the Clemency slot some time to post and such. RAS was doing a fair bit of flailing but I could see it coming from town too.
Damn, I missed another chance of obv!scumming. Can we retake this scene, boss?In post 237, Flavor Leaf wrote:If Ras is town, scum is probably in the people who voted Ras after I started posting.
That's splendid! Please share these reasons when you're feeling up to it.In post 533, mastina wrote:Reason implies singular. I have several, so it's plural.In post 424, Elbirn wrote:Mastina do you have a reason for declaring RAS/Clemency "town as town can be" or what?
To be clear I'm not directly comparing them based on that trait. The point I'm trying to make is that if x behaviour is being called scummy in person a, why is it being ignored in b?In post 577, Montosh wrote:I don't feel it's entirely the same though. Titus appears to be posting to appear active while saying comparatively little despite being in the game since it started. Clemency doesn't appear to be doing that. They just seem to be lurking more, and RAS was contributing in what I thought was good faith despite the way they exited later.In post 575, ConManMick wrote:You know what? I'm going on Clemency. I dislike RAS' out. I don't think comparisons to Nancy's exit are in good faith. I don't see anything in Clemency's posts that screams town. I see some filler posting (which you guys have a problem with from Titus) and I see a VERY convenient "oh I guess the lurkers are scum" list. And I don't like that this is being gotten away with.
VOTE: Clemency
PEDIT what
I honestly don't see them as being all that similar.
I could see Clemency's lurking coming from town. I think lurking is scummy but I think Titus' active lurking is more scummy.ConManMick wrote:Clemency has had time to post. What do you say now?In post 306, Montosh wrote:Also I'm willing to give the Clemency slot some time to post and such. RAS was doing a fair bit of flailing but I could see it coming from town too.
It was tonally awkward but I thought that was because she was trying to hint something to me. I have since put in 0 effort to deduce what that is.
Because it's not x behaviour in both. I see active lurking as very different from lurking. It's lurking with the intent of appearing to look like you're not. I get a much stronger sense of active lurking from Titus.In post 582, ConManMick wrote: To be clear I'm not directly comparing them based on that trait. The point I'm trying to make is that if x behaviour is being called scummy in person a, why is it being ignored in b?
Wait. What? We didn't even get the chance to fake claimIn post 275, Flavor Leaf wrote:I am ready to end the day.
To some extent yes. Like I said if it was just Clemency in that slot the whole game I might vote with you right now. But my read on RAS still stands. I ISOed them in a previous post and came away with town vibes.In post 585, ConManMick wrote:Ok, consider this: is that just down to the timescale each has been in the game?
Also lolIn post 587, Almost50 wrote:@CMM: Since you're obviously on now and I'm still catching up.. did you post anything that's AI for you yet? If so.. can you point it out?
Explain why you think me + gamma wagon = scummy plezIn post 563, Montosh wrote:I could see a scum being on the gamma wagon. I'd bet Titus or (less so) Elbirn if I had to.
Have you? All I'm seeing is "look guys I'm reading the thread, we're all pals Ecks dee"In post 587, Almost50 wrote:@CMM: Since you're obviously on now and I'm still catching up.. did you post anything that's AI for you yet? If so.. can you point it out?
For some reason I thought you were later on the wagon. I grouped you in there because I'm getting slight active lurking vibes, less so than Titus though. I wasn't a big fan of the gamma wagon overall since it seemed kinda clear that gamma just wasn't onsite at that point. The string of naked votes there felt off to me.In post 590, Elbirn wrote:Explain why you think me + gamma wagon = scummy plezIn post 563, Montosh wrote:I could see a scum being on the gamma wagon. I'd bet Titus or (less so) Elbirn if I had to.
Go home A50, you're drunkIn post 594, Almost50 wrote:Say, who did skitter replace again?
Also, maybe/no/maybeIn post 592, Almost50 wrote:What if I said that by the end if page 12 I am thinking 2 scums are in LUV/CMM/Elbrin