In post 1053, Ausuka wrote:Ok I had an irrelephant case in my mind but am too tired to critically think so I'm just posting this: I don't think he's telling us everything about the Gambit thing. The most likely scenario from his pov here was town alisae correctly identifying the slip thing and voting him for it. At this point anything he says about it being a trap for Ali just looks like blatant excuses; it doesn't make sense. The whole thing makes much more sense if he was planning to deny the existence of a crumb at all were it to be called out; it's certainly vague to the point where you could make a compelling argument it isn't. For someone who hasn't read most of the game his insistence on an Alisae lynch and surprise that I wouldn't vote them with the case he had also feels really fake. His early game also felt scummy but unsure to what extent I can case that
Okay, Alisae case coming soon. I don't see how you can feel my earlygame was scummy and I think your read of my read on Alisae is the thing that makes no sense. I'll lay it all out for you and then if you keep pushing I'll at least know you're trying 0% to try to understand my pov.
In post 1073, Enigma wrote: In post 942, Irrelephant11 wrote:Splitting this wall into multiple posts:
In post 308, insomnia wrote:Yeah, looking back, Irrel’s chainsaw was pretty shit to be honest.
The emotion behind the posts was over the top and therefore fake.
It was early game, I was looking for something to push, didn't really believe it myself.
In post 320, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I’m not sure why some of you are following the other game intensely. It’s not by any means going to help your team win. Sure it’s nice to have someone to bounce reads off of, but in my experience, it’s very hard to stay engaged if you’re not actually playing.
I'll be passing this post on to my partner as something I don't think a member of a T/T pair would say.
ok these posts are off
the early game justification is seems like a weak back track
the 2nd part is also awkward, especially in terms of associatives
irrel seems to be implying that he thinks luv pair is t/s or s/s. yet irrel doesn't actually push luv (or mention luv really in his iso) or follow up on this. reading from that, it feels that irrel knows the alignment of luv, but is reluctant to do anything about it
This post is a joke.
An early game push being bad is your scumcase of me? I was trying to get something beyond "Alisae and Nero don't like each other" going, saw a post that gave me a mild scum-ping, and voted insomnia for it. Then he pointed out that that post had context, and the vote became pointless. What about chasing an early feeling for a minute is scummy? why would scum!me immediately back down off insomnia (it's not like I know he's town if I'm scum... because multiball, hello)
2. I'm not sure how much I'm allowed to go into my reads of the opposing game but the short version is the LUV post seemed much more indicative of LUV's partner's alignment than LUV's own alignment.
Is enigma an elephant lyncher because he's had it out for me ever since I scumleaned him for a half second on page like 6
okay I could lynch baezu
@anyone townreading firebringer - why? I thought my vote there would start a wagon tbh
