Mini Normal 2080 ft. My Cats [Game Over]

[Nero Cain]

I choose C - false scenario. You weren’t being wagonned at the time of 2034. In fact, you only had ONE VOTE. This is what I mean about not reading and being deliberately misreppy

Do you feel like you were being clear about what you meant? If you think I'm scum shouldn't you be trying to convince ppl here? So it seems odd that you didn't link to show people exactly what you meant.

man, im tired of the day.

I agree on tired.

Also you never even called me out on it so I'm not really buying that you felt this was scummy.

This is not scum. Like not a chance.

We have 2.5 days. Yes people are adrenaline’s out after the drama of the claim last night. But there is still time to find a lynch that doesn’t scream compromise because who gives a fuck anymore. That’s what the tone of this room and like 8 votes are. And it’s fucking gross.

Also, you are hard defending Flubber here for ???? reason and it looks more like you knew he was town then had reasons to town read him.

[teacher]

I choose C - false scenario. You weren’t being wagonned at the time of 2034. In fact, you only had ONE VOTE. This is what I mean about not reading and being deliberately misreppy

Do you feel like you were being clear about what you meant? If you think I'm scum shouldn't you be trying to convince ppl here? So it seems odd that

you didn't link

to show people exactly what you meant.

AYFKM!!!!!!! There is a fucking link right in the post you are quoting. Like, what the fuck are you saying?

man, im tired of the day.

I agree on tired.

Also you never even called me out on it so I'm not really buying that you felt this was scummy.

Again, LoL. I did call out the rapid votes in general as scummy -- "That’s what the tone of this room and like 8 votes are. And it’s fucking gross." 2035. Are you really complaining that I hadnt sorted out which of the three rapid votes in succession was scummiest? Another post, another misrep.

This is not scum. Like not a chance.

We have 2.5 days. Yes people are adrenaline’s out after the drama of the claim last night. But there is still time to find a lynch that doesn’t scream compromise because who gives a fuck anymore. That’s what the tone of this room and like 8 votes are. And it’s fucking gross.

Also, you are hard defending Flubber here for ???? reason and it looks more like you knew he was town then had reasons to town read him.

And here you actually have the balls to quote the very post calling out the quick run-up of Flubber as scummy right after complaining that I didnt say it was scummy. And you show a complete ignorance of what your supposed scumread has been saying about other slots (when theoretically you should be looking for associatives). I explained my changing Flubber read in 1885 (not to mention 2032 and 2040). Also, sometimes the formation of a wagon spews someones alignment pretty quickly. So yes I was hard defending Flubber because day ending like that would have been alot less useful than how it did eventually end, with another wagon and more data.

[skitter30]

Ok teacher can be town now

[Nero Cain]

Also, I've never been that inactive. looking at the post #'s they are all p close.

between

y?

and

Why is teacher null, Dp?

was about 30 posts

and on Saturday night I posted

Right, but being useful with it does require, well, using it, no?

I mean you are tied for the lead wagon and I don't really want to vote Dean. How am I not using my vote?

and Sunday night

-NC should've been more conf!town but his presence really diminished with the game. I actually agree with him on a lot of things (surprise) and obviously my fellow comrade is going to be TR'd, but *tinfoil* that lack of scrutiny towards that slot and I felt like his momentum went slightly down after a strong start requires thinking.

I've been somewhat busy this weekend and it made me a little lazier than normal.

oh dear God, someone is busy on a weekend and didn't post for 100 posts.

and then there's

hot take, town are more likely to push a miller claim and scum are more likely to defend it.

in my limited exp. with Shosin she's a lurksack as town so the hyperactivity means this is prob scum.

VOTE: shoshin

i went 300+ posts without posting. Yes im such a lurker.

[Nero Cain]

VOTE: Nero

I like this for scum. Seems to be deliberate misreading multiple posts and belittling case against them. He didnt demotivate at "one point," he did it for half of an entire game day. He was pushing the cop claim, but letting nom take the front of that. That positioning (plus the earlier positioning saying it was ok when it was still Deanius, being voted by all three of his purported scumreads) seems grody. Seemed in a bizarre rush to give intent on flubber when that was clearly the who gives a fuck lynch.

lol, there's no link here

[Nero Cain]

Again, LoL. I did call out the rapid votes in general as scummy -- "That’s what the tone of this room and like 8 votes are. And it’s fucking gross." 2035. Are you really complaining that I hadn't sorted out which of the three rapid votes in succession was scummiest? Another post, another misrep.

calling something gross is vague as fuck. Did you specifically call my rapid vote scummy? no.

[teacher]

Nero (denier),

Also, I've never been that inactive.

meet Nero (acknowledger):

They demotivated over he course of the day.

Is demotivation scummy? I'm just being lazy.

Please choose one personality.

[Dunnstral]

Ok teacher can be town now

How would a scum U r a person 2 lynch affect your opinion?

[Nero Cain]

I'm not denying that I went 300 posts without posting but I had already posted alot and done alot of work in this game. You said I had demotivated and I asked you why that is scummy.

[teacher]

VOTE: Nero

I like this for scum. Seems to be deliberate misreading multiple posts and belittling case against them. He didnt demotivate at "one point," he did it for half of an entire game day. He was pushing the cop claim, but letting nom take the front of that. That positioning (plus the earlier positioning saying it was ok when it was still Deanius, being voted by all three of his purported scumreads) seems grody. Seemed in a bizarre rush to give intent on flubber when that was clearly the who gives a fuck lynch.

lol, there's no link here

I expected people would remember the sudden flubber bubble and pushback. A link to the specific gamestate is not necessary when it is a memorable event. It only became necessary when you claimed you did it because you were being wagonned.

With that excuse gone, do you want to try another?

[Nero Cain]

He didnt demotivate at "one point,"

he did it for half of an entire game day

now THIS is a misrep. I went 300 posts without a post. That is nowhere near half the gameday.

[skitter30]

Ok teacher can be town now

How would a scum U r a person 2 lynch affect your opinion?

He's be scummier for defending him

[teacher]

I'm not denying that I went 300 posts without posting but I had already posted alot and done alot of work in this game. You said I had demotivated and I asked you why that is scummy.

Redirection.

Before, you admitted you were being lazy over the latter part of D1.

Now you are saying you did not demotivate by pointing to your postcount (an irrelevant stat, because all posts are not created equal).

Which is it.

PEdit: again, irrelevant fact where not all posts are equal. You did demotivate and admitted it.

[Dunnstral]

"There was a link in that post"

"There is no link in that post"

Then you essentially blame him while pushing that aside -- yeah, that's scummy, you're just arguing with him

[teacher]

Because he changed what post he was talking about.

[Nero Cain]

no i didn't

[Dunnstral]

So it's just a misunderstanding?

[Nero Cain]

i guess or a misrep on his part

[Nero Cain]

Do you feel like you were being clear about what you meant? If you think I'm scum shouldn't you be trying to convince ppl here? So it seems odd that you didn't link to show people exactly what you meant.

was clearly about

VOTE: Nero

I like this for scum. Seems to be deliberate misreading multiple posts and belittling case against them. He didnt demotivate at "one point," he did it for half of an entire game day. He was pushing the cop claim, but letting nom take the front of that. That positioning (plus the earlier positioning saying it was ok when it was still Deanius, being voted by all three of his purported scumreads) seems grody. Seemed in a bizarre rush to give intent on flubber when that was clearly the who gives a fuck lynch.

[teacher]

In 3200, you quote 3198 where there was a link.
In 3204, you quote 3173 where there wasnt a link.

You changed the post you were talking about.

[Nero Cain]

no I didn't.

in 3200 I'm clearly asking you if you felt that 3173 was you being clear about what you meant.

b/c FMPOV you weren't and that's exactly why I though you were talking about the later Flubber wagon b/c you weren't clear and didn't link to what you meant.

[Nero Cain]

I'm not denying that I went 300 posts without posting but I had already posted alot and done alot of work in this game. You said I had demotivated and I asked you why that is scummy.

Redirection.

Before, you admitted you were being lazy over the latter part of D1.

Now you are saying you did not demotivate by pointing to your postcount (an irrelevant stat, because all posts are not created equal).

Which is it.

PEdit: again, irrelevant fact where not all posts are equal. You did demotivate and admitted it.

OBJECTION!

argumentative.

I'm not denying that I was lazy during a portion of d1 but it's not "half of an entire game day" as you claim. But at that point, I had already posted alot of done alot of work. Why can't I take a break and be lazy? Also, this happens alot so its null b/c it comes from both alignments so why is it scummy?

[ofrhz]

.

[ofrhz]

.

[ofrhz]

.