(PEDIT: re #
906; also, 12 new posts since I started writing this?)
In that case I'm very suspicious of #
896. It feels to me like you're trying to manipulate the gamestate away from certain wagons when you don't have a townread on the players in question. Like, the wagon on you has collapsed (for a second time), skitter starts looking elsewhere, then you get annoyed with her for looking in the wrong place even though you don't disagree with her reads?
(#
898 is also confusing me. You're acting like it's common knowledge that you have a very strong scumread on Kop, yet you haven't really done much to express it so far; I don't count #
699 because that's clearly a pressure post. I didn't really pick up much of a Kop read from reading your posts over the course of the game, and going back and ISOing you all I can pick up is that you think Kop must be scum because if someone else off your wagon was scum, you would have been hammered?)
On a slightly different note, you seem to be having "recursive tunnel reads", you start with a premise (in this case, that Lich is really strong scum), then use it as a lens through which to view the whole gamestate (e.g. you're apparently viewing anyone who votes skitter as suspect because Lich is voting skitter, even though you apparently don't have much of a townread on skitter apart from that).
Combining the two points: it feels to me at the moment like you feel you need a scumread on Kop for whatever reason (perhaps because you think it's the only/main way to make TemporalLich make sense as scum), but don't have a strong independent scumread, and are trying to find a natural way to move into that position without post-rationalising (after all the discussion we've had about post-rationalisation so far this game, it's understandable that you wouldn't want to be caught doing that yourself!). Thus the fairly panicky calls for me to explain my Kop vote, presumably so that you can sheep me after the explanation.
I would like Kop to answer #
880, though, as I think the answers would be helpful for reading him (the questions were inspired by his recent string of posts). Working out why I asked the questions might also be useful for reading me.
