How insane would it be if I proposed a lynch outside of the cop claims
ripperinoKorina wrote:
In post 1875, Spangled wrote:The way I read it, you make it appear as if they are something else — if a Tracker tracks them, they do whatever you say they did, if a Cop check them, they are whatever you say they are etc.
@mod
Is this more or less correct?
Specifically you want to hammer him? No just vote him and let someone else hammer him, considering that he's L-2?In post 1982, Skygazer wrote:i wanna hammer james tbh
Why would we do that?In post 1976, Chemist1422 wrote:Question
How insane would it be if I proposed a lynch outside of the cop claims
What does "leash Gob" mean? Terminology on this site changes so frequently I can't keep up with it.In post 1963, Gamma Emerald wrote:I meant "go on with" as in "go on with why Sky is scum". And I voted Sky because I wanted to leash Gob.
If chem's claim is false (and again, I'm not charging that it is), then two cops is possible. It's possible in III or above.In post 1967, Gamma Emerald wrote:No. Me and James both claimed full cop, not one shot.
^ This. It's better to block a suspicion and kill a claim than vice versa.In post 1970, Chemist1422 wrote:Because there was a chance that Gamma didn't flip cop
Yes, it is. It's not likely, but if you're lying, then we could be in III or higher, in which two full cops is a possibility. We could test it by having people claim "not neapolitan or gunsmith," but I don't think that's optimal rn.In post 1971, Chemist1422 wrote:That is not how it worksIn post 1939, Persivul wrote:Actually there is - if chem's claim is false. I don't think that's the case, but it should be put out there.In post 1892, Gamma Emerald wrote:Btw there's no way both our claims are real
Pretty insane. I've pointed out that if you're lying, two cops are possible. But, I've only done that because I don't want false info out there, not because I really think that's the case. We need to lynch in the cop claims today.In post 1976, Chemist1422 wrote:How insane would it be if I proposed a lynch outside of the cop claims
That could probably be arranged...In post 1982, Skygazer wrote:i wanna hammer james tbh
I'm prepared to vote James. I can understand a newbie not knowing how to crumb innos properly and so not doing it. I didn't crumb innos my first couple of times. But, I don't buy that he was attempting an inno crumb on me in 1406, and that post makes no sense otherwise. That's pretty much a smoking gun (good work by sakura pointing that out).In post 1985, Skygazer wrote:yes i specifically want the hammer
i've wanted to lynch james since yesterday and i'll quicklynch anyone who steals the hammer from me tbh
catharsis?In post 1986, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why does it matter?
Make him shoot for town's benefit.In post 1987, Persivul wrote:What does "leash Gob" mean? Terminology on this site changes so frequently I can't keep up with it.In post 1963, Gamma Emerald wrote:I meant "go on with" as in "go on with why Sky is scum". And I voted Sky because I wanted to leash Gob.
Who's the 1 shot neap/gunsmith in that case?In post 1988, Persivul wrote:If chem's claim is false (and again, I'm not charging that it is), then two cops is possible. It's possible in III or above.In post 1967, Gamma Emerald wrote:No. Me and James both claimed full cop, not one shot.
This is where I'm atIn post 1994, Chemist1422 wrote:If there were two cops the Neo/Gunsmith would’ve CCed me