Micro 892: TemporalLich's Micro Normal [Game Over]

[Donempire]

Yes?

I said i didnt see any problems with it, and that i liked it. That isnt enough for a townread but i do read her more strongly as town than i do klick. Is there a problem so far?
And with klick i told my problems with her.
I really wish you'd do more than just simple question marks or one liners.

[Chemist1422]

You said Klick was very scummy but now you’re saying you don’t scumread him?

[Datisi]

Dongempire, what changed between 77 and 82? Seems like a weird progression on Icon.

Nothing?
I hadnt read up on the game yet when i made the post, and just saw that icon was in the game and menals comment. Then i read up properly and saw he was towny.

Gotcha. Thought your read had changed because of the posts made between 77 and 82.

I dont tr bella, nor do i sr klick. I'm going through the motions, i think saying that i have strong reads on either would be stretching it right now.

I didn't say you do. What I meant by saying you "TR Bella over Klick" (and I see if my wording could've been a bit confusing there) is that you think Bella is more Town than Klick.

Not gonna fly with just saying the last posts are bad, provide examples if you want this cart rolling.

Examples of Bella's posts I'm not a fan of are 52 and 65. Sure, she's asking questions, but I'm not sure I see her using the answers for anything? To me it just reads like passive questioning of others.

[Klick]

Spoiler:

Im all for moving out of RVs as soon as possible,

You had a perfect opportunity to make this happen by letting a few more people react to the Lover thing - why shut it down?

Dont see the point of pushing on bell over this.

Yes she

could

have but she didnt, and its not like its an alignment indicative thing.

I'm not going to say it is shading directly, i dont think it is, but i still dont like this post.

Hm? Why mention that if you dont think its AI at all?

Great, a wiseass.

I'd appreciate it if you could keep the snark to a minimum, especially if its going to be unfunny snark like this.

It's a genuine point against what you've said. You don't like it when I point out something that's NAI, yet you do it in the same post. I don't see how Town!you can find that scummy when you're doing the exact same thing.

I'm also rather confused by you finding me scummy, yet not scumreading me.

[Donempire]

I dont tr bella, nor do i sr klick. I'm going through the motions, i think saying that i have strong reads on either would be stretching it right now.

I didn't say you do. What I meant by saying you "TR Bella over Klick" (and I see if my wording could've been a bit confusing there) is that you think Bella is more Town than Klick.

Not gonna fly with just saying the last posts are bad, provide examples if you want this cart rolling.

Examples of Bella's posts I'm not a fan of are 52 and 65. Sure, she's asking questions, but I'm not sure I see her using the answers for anything? To me it just reads like passive questioning of others.

I understood but after i already posted it lol my bad,
I guess what it comes down to is gut, i think bellas posting comes more naturally. Besides that, i dont really have anything to object with her posting, compared to klick at least.

Hmm... i agree that on their own they seem bad, but she hasnt posted yet. I'll keep those in mind.

[Donempire]

Spoiler:

Im all for moving out of RVs as soon as possible,

You had a perfect opportunity to make this happen by letting a few more people react to the Lover thing - why shut it down?

Dont see the point of pushing on bell over this.

Yes she

could

have but she didnt, and its not like its an alignment indicative thing.

I'm not going to say it is shading directly, i dont think it is, but i still dont like this post.

Hm? Why mention that if you dont think its AI at all?

Great, a wiseass.

I'd appreciate it if you could keep the snark to a minimum, especially if its going to be unfunny snark like this.

It's a genuine point against what you've said. You don't like it when I point out something that's NAI, yet you do it in the same post. I don't see how Town!you can find that scummy when you're doing the exact same thing.

I'm also rather confused by you finding me scummy, yet not scumreading me.

I'm not. Did you understand what i was trying to say? If you say i'm doing the exact same thing, you havent.

[Donempire]

You said Klick was very scummy but now you’re saying you don’t scumread him?

Guess so, yeah. I dont like her posts so much and if i had to say her alignment i'd lean more on scum, but besides that its early game and i dont think 3 posts are anything to go off by. I dont just question people i scumread.

[Bellaphant]

Thanks menalqr, appreciate the response.

@locke, what made that defensive for you, rather than suspicious?

Thoughts on the other pages?

@datisi, this is what I do day one - I ask a lot of questions. I'm trying to get a read on people, not necessarily direct the thread.

[Datisi]

@datisi, this is what I do day one - I ask a lot of questions. I'm trying to get a read on people, not necessarily direct the thread.

I mean, asking a lot of questions is fair game, hell I often do it a lot myself, but I kinda don't see the answers being used? Like, did Mena's answer impact your Mena or Icon read?

[Donempire]

@datisi, this is what I do day one - I ask a lot of questions. I'm trying to get a read on people, not necessarily direct the thread.

Well, what have you got so far? If you're going to be doing one thing only at least share the results.

[Klick]

I'm not. Did you understand what i was trying to say? If you say i'm doing the exact same thing, you havent.

I'm not really sure what this means, sorry.

Why do you townread Icon?

[Bellaphant]

Ive asked two (now three) questions - one of which to iconium, who hasn't replied to me - but from others' response, I'm guessing he's just like this. I can't read this slot well yet.

It's pretty obvious iiked the thought that went into menalques answer and they cleared up an issue I had with two different reactions that didn't make sense to me (to klick and ice).

It's should also be easy to reckon I'm not impressed with Locke's posting.

[Bellaphant]

P-edit. What was Dong's reason for asking me basically the same question in a less constructive way in the very next post? There's little to be gained from that.

[Donempire]

To see you cry about it?

[Donempire]

I'm not. Did you understand what i was trying to say? If you say i'm doing the exact same thing, you havent.

I'm not really sure what this means, sorry.

Why do you townread Icon?

Hes active yet he doesnt post fluff... mostly. I cant point to any one post and say this is the one, pretty much most of his posts seem to be made with either questioning someone or pointing a contradiction out in mind. I also dont see him this nonchalant as scum, he is easy to read so it wouldnt make sense for him to give us something to read him off off.

[Klick]

To see you cry about it?

Great, a wiseass.

I'd appreciate it if you could keep the snark to a minimum, especially if its going to be unfunny snark like this.

[Donempire]

I thought it was funny

[Locke113]

Thanks menalqr, appreciate the response.

@locke, what made that defensive for you, rather than suspicious?

Thoughts on the other pages?

@datisi, this is what I do day one - I ask a lot of questions. I'm trying to get a read on people, not necessarily direct the thread.

Could just be that I'm bias against people voting people voting them on page 1, almost always seems at least a little OMGUS to me. I know I certainly didn't seen any reason to find his reasoning fake as you put it
Overall liking datisi, always like an active sorter, klick is there, not really sure how to feel about him at the moment, liked menal's entrance, chemist is mostly nothing at the moment, pot calling kettle black I know, dong's funny so my read maybe bias but leaning town currently. And the rest of your posts don't make me feel more inclined to consider you town so I'mma keep my vote on you

To see you cry about it?

[Bellaphant]

'
Could just be that I'm bias against people voting people voting them on page 1, almost always seems at least a little OMGUS to me. I know I certainly didn't seen any reason to find his reasoning fake as you put it'

Where did this happen?
You really think he thought he had a legit reason to place a serious vote, rather than something mainly created to move out of RVs?
Thoughts on menalqe's post on datisi and her scum play?

[Locke113]

'
Could just be that I'm bias against people voting people voting them on page 1, almost always seems at least a little OMGUS to me. I know I certainly didn't seen any reason to find his reasoning fake as you put it'

Where did this happen?
You really think he thought he had a legit reason to place a serious vote, rather than something mainly created to move out of RVs?
Thoughts on menalqe's post on datisi and her scum play?

I mean his reasoning was "seems opportunistic" so it reads to me like a gut feeling that he followed very early so as to move out of RVS. So from my pov it looks like a bit of both.

I'm sure he's right about her scum play, afterall he's played a game with her, so she will be one to keep an eye on throughout the game

[Bellaphant]

'Could just be that I'm bias against people voting people voting them on page 1, almost always seems at least a little OMGUS to me.'

Where did this happen?

[Bellaphant]

UNVOTE:

VOTE: locke

I don't think you are reading, and therefore not sorting. Your reaction to the datisi thing is super off.

[Locke113]

'Could just be that I'm bias against people voting people voting them on page 1, almost always seems at least a little OMGUS to me.'

Where did this happen?

UNVOTE:

VOTE: locke

I don't think you are reading, and therefore not sorting. Your reaction to the datisi thing is super off.

[Locke113]

whoops that was a mistake. I see what you mean know, you didn't vote Icon my bad. that teaches me to skim.

I can understand you voting me for saying you voted Icon when you didn't, but what was off about the datisi thing?

[Bellaphant]

I mean, you misread the vote, and also missed the question. That's...two missed thing sin your reading of me and it's page 5. (I know, I muddled people's names earlier, pot, kettle) .


It's not 'voting you for saying' anything, I clearly said I don't think you are reading.


The datisi thing is similar - two people town read her (three including me), I asked menalqe about their response to klick and ice tr-ing her, menalque explained...and yet you just went with 'datisi is sorting', which feels really surface, considering there's been a fair bit of interaction about reading datisi.