Disagree by personal opinion and experience. In day 1s, VT is the most replaced slot in the firstgamer category (players who are playing their very first game, as opposed as generic newbie who may or may not have played 2+ games on this site or elsewhere), because you are thrown into an unfriendly environment with zero info whatsoever, knowing that you will gain none because you have no night powers, and without experienced leadership to support you. Being in a team is a better experience for a firstgamer, although they will soon realize being newb!scum is hard as hell, so they might replace out of it in 2nd or 3rd game. A lot of newbies give up after the first game regardless of alignment though, therefore statistically scum replacements are usually less than VT replacements. Town PR (excluding mason, probably the most desirable role for a firstgamer) stands in-between. Day 2 onwards, especially if newb!scum has been caught or left alone because their partner has been lynched, it's a different pair of shoes. All of this is only very slightly AI though, i wouldn't bet much on this reasoning alone. Take it as a mathematical exercise rather than an efficient scumhunt tool.
In post 875, Blatant Scum wrote: In post 851, Farkran wrote:If jocus is town i think at least 1 scum in {sely, nacl, qc, emps} makes a lot of sense. On a green flip we know where to look at in d3
At least one scum in a set of 5 from 7 people. This is not very helpful.
Technically it's
at least
1 in a set of
4
out of
8
people, which makes it a much more desirable result than what you described here, but again this is mostly mathematics. My point was that i am already townreading NaCl and TLing Sely, so it might very well be 1 out of 2, and a flip helps us sort that.
In post 881, Blatant Scum wrote: In post 862, Farkran wrote: In post 859, emps wrote:farkran mind explaining ur scumread on me? is it just the whole bad progression on qc thing or is it more than that?
Progression on QC is not really cool, but overall you seem to fit the paranoid profile except that you don't seem so much concerned about your own paranoia
I mean, d1 you had 4 scumleans and just 1 townlean, you voted half of the town but you forgot QC (who was one of the scumleans) and didn't even bother to question ethos even though you had him no higher than null as of
574. You pretty much stopped interacting with him even though he voted you and he was one lf the major culprits behind the whole d1 messy situation that led to a no lynch. | This makes me think you already knew he was going to die. Plus there's also a chance you didn't notice the PR softclaim and you killed him out of fear for his suggested solve.
All in all you don't seem too concerned about your reads. The only hardpush you make is sausar who i agree is scummy but you are flailing on everyone else and you don't look like scumhunting or trying to sort them, rather like someone who just wants to survive the day
I don't like repeating already known facts.
The whole text seems manipulative to me.
I don't like the fact that in | the paragraph continues instead of new being created.
I... do not understand what you meant to say here. I see a | inside my quote, but i don't understand what it means. As for repeating facts, i have been asked for a scumcase and i provided a comprehensive one.
