Mini Normal 2108 : 1st game

[Robbnva]

Oh you did but you didn’t.

[Tchill13]

got my eye on skitter's probing of robb for sure.

[cyrus62]

Official Vote Count 1.02

Lynching
With 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to lynch.

bob3141:(0)
Tchill13:(1) bob3141
Garmr:(1) skitter30
Robbnva:(2) Rabid Schnauzer skitter30
Wake88(:2) Hectic BrightEyedFish
Hectic:(1) Robbnva
skitter30:(0)
Rabid Schnauzer:(0)
BrightEyedFish:(2) Garmr Tchill13

Not Voting (9): Wake88

Deadline (expired on 2019-11-29 20:40:00)

[BrightEyedFish]

EBWOP

My vote is on wake because this was going to be my excuse if I have trouble getting engaged on D1.

your excuse in this game in particular or in games in general?
have you used this excuse before?

Games in general. My reads on D1 are basically always gut/vibe/inconsistencies. I like to use VCA as a starting point for my more substantial reads and until we have a flip it's hard for me to start making associations.

For example:
I want to believe with all of my heart that this hectic/robb thing is scum theater. It could very well be, see I'm already heading in that direction.

[Garmr]

I took a sezuire so I'm not up for posting will tomorrow.

[Robbnva]

So bef, do you have any other thoughts on the game? Reads on anyone else?

[Rabid Schnauzer]

Well people have accused people of things that are nai. You being one of them. Me saying what I said and using legit (besides the fact that legit is part of my vocabulary) means that the stuff I find scummy are things I’ve actually seen scum do. Instead of using a long work like actually, I say legit. If y’all want to call it a slip go ahead but it isn’t. Your line of thinking doesn’t even make sense on a logical or even common sense level so I’m not going to worry about it.

Except...this entire post

is

you worrying about it.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

and it kinda implies you feel like this situation needs some credibility because rn you're bullshitting so you're comparing it to a ~true~ time you've caught scum this way

the key part was this part ^

Yes, that's what I thought as well. The "legit" line of discussion seems like a straw man distraction.

[Robbnva]

Except...this entire post is you worrying about it.

Responding to somebody /discussing it isn’t worrying. Nice try though.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

I accuse people, see how they react, and then sort.
It's why I poked so many people with my first posts in the game.
Reads list incoming.

That’s a way I guess. You can’t really reaction test people that way

Why can't you reaction test someone by accusing them and seeing how they react?

[Robbnva]

Yes, that's what I thought as well. The "legit" line of discussion seems like a straw man distraction.

You should probably learn the definition of straw man before before using it. That isn’t an example of straw man

[Robbnva]

Why can't you reaction test someone by accusing them and seeing how they react?

Cause reactions are usually nai.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

You’ve basically ignored game relevant discussion for something insignificant. If you think I broke a rule. Report me and move on. And ATE is NAI so you really should focus on more important things if you are town.

You don't get to declare what can or cannot be a reaction test (above), and you don't get to declare that AtE is NAI. It gets mentioned enough that it has an acronym and a wiki page, so apparently a lot of people think it can be AI. This is (at least) the second instance of you trying to control the narrative by declaring what counts as valid scum hunting.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

What are your thoughts about what’s actually happened?

You're scum.

You try to misrep me as only coming in on the replace out issue. Fact is I had already changed my RVS vote to a serious vote on you due to your reaction to Hectic's posts, which clearly seemed to be joking or RT to me.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

got my eye on skitter's probing of robb for sure.

Bad post.

[Robbnva]

I can actually. I can do whatever I want. Reaction tests are almost never reliable cause you have to know how somebody reacts as town and scum. Just cause you see a reaction you don’t like doesn’t mean that person is scum or even scummy.

Ate is nai cause town use ate also. You can’t determine alignment by ate and that’s been proven over and over.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

Yes, that's what I thought as well. The "legit" line of discussion seems like a straw man distraction.

You should probably learn the definition of straw man before before using it. That isn’t an example of straw man

This appears to be exactly what you accused me of doing with the rule break accusation.

[Robbnva]

What are your thoughts about what’s actually happened?

You're scum.

You try to misrep me as only coming in on the replace out issue. Fact is I had already changed my RVS vote to a serious vote on you due to your reaction to Hectic's posts, which clearly seemed to be joking or RT to me.

I wasn’t asking you. I’m not scum And I didn’t misrep you. You avoided the entire discussion and harped on something irrelevant. I wasn’t the only one who noticed.

[Robbnva]

Yes, that's what I thought as well. The "legit" line of discussion seems like a straw man distraction.

You should probably learn the definition of straw man before before using it. That isn’t an example of straw man

This appears to be exactly what you accused me of doing with the rule break accusation.

Not even close.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

Also Did you really accuse me of going after something easy to push? Try Harding and calming non ai things scummy are like

things I’ve legit see scum do

. I say SUP and don’t try to advance the game on page one ever game I play, as well as more then 75% of the players on the site. So if anyone is attacking easy things it’s you sir

I can actually. I can do whatever I want. Reaction tests are almost never reliable cause you have to know how somebody reacts as town and scum. Just cause you see a reaction you don’t like doesn’t mean that person is scum or even scummy.

Ate is nai cause town use ate also. You can’t determine alignment by ate and that’s been proven over and over.

You seem to think that it's valid to read people in part based on things you've seen scum do. Yet, when I do just that, you argue that ti's invalid.

[Rabid Schnauzer]

VOTE: Wake88

Hello!

EBWOP

My vote is on wake because this was going to be my excuse if I have trouble getting engaged on D1.

Seems like he's just screwing around to me.
VOTE: Robbnva

these are eazy votes with eazy reasoning. Nobodies gonna argue with this stuff. Looks like you're doing something.

of the 2 i find bright eyes scummier. my vote's already there.

Another bad post. You generally can't have deep, nuanced reasoning by post 11, or 12, or 29. This post is also easy reasoning that makes you look like you're doing something.

FOS: tchill

This could very well be tchill's scum game.

[Hectic]

After reconsidering, Robb's handling of our 1v1 wasn't an explicitly towny thing to do. Scum definitely don't want to get in 1v1 there, so scum!Robb stayed reasonable to give both of us a way out.
I'll downgrade him to a

Red Onion and Basil Pizza.

You still happy with your vote on me, Robb?

[Hectic]

I took a sezuire so I'm not up for posting will tomorrow.

Take it easy, man. I'll eagerly await your return when you're ready.

[Robbnva]

You seem to think that it's valid to read people in part based on things you've seen scum do. Yet, when I do just that, you argue that ti's invalid.

Nobody yet has said my reasons were nai. If somebody wants to argue that it would be one thing but that’s not the argument people are making.

Ate actually is nai though. If you don’t agree that’s fine. You can use whatever you want but I use ate as both alignments and so do many other people. Mafia gets emotional at times. The ate argument has been disproven.

You’re comparing apples to oranges here.

[Robbnva]

You still happy with your vote on me, Robb?

Yes I am.