Big Four Mafia! Game Over!

Doctor Drew · Post Post #1450 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:14 pm

In post 1448, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1445, pisskop wrote:Wake, the non-existent wake, is the least risky SR you could ever make.

You literally just tried to shame me for discussing your flubber 'SR', and Im actively being defended by half the playerbase -for a reason-.
You have, what, 2 defenders? Hardly half.

In post 1446, pisskop wrote:
In post 1444, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1443, pisskop wrote:Its garbage filler alchi
Then stop talking about it.
Youre pushing garbage filler.
Well that’s not a nice thing to say about yourself. You may be scum but you are not garbage.

A post like this makes we wanna lynch you regardless of alignment.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1451 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:45 pm

In post 1450, Doctor Drew wrote:
In post 1448, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1445, pisskop wrote:Wake, the non-existent wake, is the least risky SR you could ever make.

You literally just tried to shame me for discussing your flubber 'SR', and Im actively being defended by half the playerbase -for a reason-.
You have, what, 2 defenders? Hardly half.

In post 1446, pisskop wrote:
In post 1444, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1443, pisskop wrote:Its garbage filler alchi
Then stop talking about it.
Youre pushing garbage filler.
Well that’s not a nice thing to say about yourself. You may be scum but you are not garbage.
A post like this makes we wanna lynch you regardless of alignment.

Why?

pisskop · Post Post #1452 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:48 pm

Its scummy deflection.

Doctor Drew · Post Post #1453 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:48 pm

In post 1451, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1450, Doctor Drew wrote:
In post 1448, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1445, pisskop wrote:Wake, the non-existent wake, is the least risky SR you could ever make.

You literally just tried to shame me for discussing your flubber 'SR', and Im actively being defended by half the playerbase -for a reason-.
You have, what, 2 defenders? Hardly half.

In post 1446, pisskop wrote:
In post 1444, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1443, pisskop wrote:Its garbage filler alchi
Then stop talking about it.
Youre pushing garbage filler.
Well that’s not a nice thing to say about yourself. You may be scum but you are not garbage.
A post like this makes we wanna lynch you regardless of alignment.
Why?

Cringy humor.

Admittedly, I overreacted a bit thinking you called him garbage.

Nothing to see hear....move along

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1454 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:49 pm

In post 1452, pisskop wrote:Its scummy deflection.

No, deflection is asking for my other reads and then attacking them when I’m pushing you.

pisskop · Post Post #1455 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:50 pm

its also, you know, insulting. And the rhetorical equivalent of saying 'look at these random dancing monkies' when asked about why you steal from the donation box.

pisskop · Post Post #1456 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:50 pm

In post 1454, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1452, pisskop wrote:Its scummy deflection.
No, deflection is asking for my other reads and then attacking them when I’m pushing you.

You dont have a case

pisskop · Post Post #1457 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:50 pm

You cant soft a guilty when Titus went and hard confed me.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1458 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:51 pm

In post 1456, pisskop wrote:
In post 1454, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1452, pisskop wrote:Its scummy deflection.
No, deflection is asking for my other reads and then attacking them when I’m pushing you.
You dont have a case

Even better, I have a guilty.

pisskop · Post Post #1459 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:51 pm

just because your reads are verified to be vapid doesnt mean you can tell everyone to ignore them

pisskop · Post Post #1460 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:51 pm

In post 1458, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1456, pisskop wrote:
In post 1454, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1452, pisskop wrote:Its scummy deflection.
No, deflection is asking for my other reads and then attacking them when I’m pushing you.
You dont have a case
Even better, I have a guilty.

oh really, a guilty on a mason?

pisskop · Post Post #1461 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:52 pm

Tell us more when you claim because you'll be L-1

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1462 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:52 pm

In post 1457, pisskop wrote:You cant soft a guilty when Titus went and hard confed me.

Except why should I think it’s really confirmed?

Doctor Drew · Post Post #1463 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:55 pm

In post 1457, pisskop wrote:You cant soft a guilty when Titus went and hard confed me.

This is what is getting me.

If you have a guilty, Alchemist, say it. You are well beyond being afforded the opportunity to be coy or hinting at it since you soft claimed.

But.

Pisskop, maybe I missed it, bit Titus 'confirmed' you......but why am I trusting her?

Pre Edit: Masons, got it........Pisskop, sorry to be so doubting, but doesn't mean you are town Masons.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1464 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:56 pm

In post 1460, pisskop wrote:
In post 1458, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1456, pisskop wrote:
In post 1454, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1452, pisskop wrote:Its scummy deflection.
No, deflection is asking for my other reads and then attacking them when I’m pushing you.
You dont have a case
Even better, I have a guilty.
oh really, a guilty on a mason?

See, this is what I was waiting for. That 20% chance that could make you not scum. You seemed like you wanted to say it but seemed so hesitant to lock in that association. Now why did we have to go through all this trouble?

Yes, I am a PT Cop and I saw that you have a PT. And tonight I can see if Flubber had one.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Wake

pisskop · Post Post #1465 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:57 pm

less mediating, more voting.

pisskop · Post Post #1466 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:57 pm

In post 1464, Alchemist21 wrote:See, this is what I was waiting for. That 20% chance that could make you not scum. You seemed like you wanted to say it but seemed so hesitant to lock in that association. Now why did we have to go through all this trouble?

Yes, I am a PT Cop and I saw that you have a PT. And tonight I can see if Flubber had one.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Wake

annnnd no.

TrueSoulEnergy · Post Post #1467 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:57 pm

In post 1463, Doctor Drew wrote:
In post 1457, pisskop wrote:You cant soft a guilty when Titus went and hard confed me.
This is what is getting me.

If you have a guilty, Alchemist, say it. You are well beyond being afforded the opportunity to be coy or hinting at it since you soft claimed.

But.

Pisskop, maybe I missed it, bit Titus 'confirmed' you......but why am I trusting her?

Pre Edit: Masons, got it........Pisskop, sorry to be so doubting, but doesn't mean you are town Masons.

Apparently Masons are Neighbours now according to Drew.

pisskop · Post Post #1468 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:58 pm

Did he really just claim that he didnt account for fuckin' hoods?

Alchemist21 · Post Post #1469 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 3:59 pm

In post 1468, pisskop wrote:Did he really just claim that he didnt account for fuckin' hoods?

I was accounting for it. It’s what made that “mod-confirmed” claim from Titus weird because you wouldn’t reciprocate it.

pisskop · Post Post #1470 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:00 pm

Nah

Still keeping my vote on you.

pisskop · Post Post #1471 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:00 pm

Get roped

Doctor Drew · Post Post #1472 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:00 pm

Post Edit: Again, Baker games get a bit bastardy.......saying you are Masons doesn't hard clear you in my eyes.

Post Pre Edit: TSE, what are you getting on about?

Doctor Drew · Post Post #1473 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:02 pm

Post post Edit: oh....no I was saying in a Baker game Masons wouldn't necessarily be town sided.

pisskop · Post Post #1474 (ISO) » Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:04 pm

Weve seen no evidence for 3p or balls, and futhermore no evidence that no evidence that its bastard.