Mini Normal 2108 : 1st game

Robbnva · Post Post #575 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:53 am

In post 565, BrightEyedFish wrote:Why do people feel the need to say how they would play IF they were scum?

self brag/self defense that's why. I usually ignore it. I think this actually fits into skitter's wheel house as scum.

Robbnva · Post Post #576 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 3:54 am

In post 567, BrightEyedFish wrote:I do think tchill vs garmr could be TvT tbh.

part of me wants to believe this but I just think garmr's reasons are really bad.

Robbnva · Post Post #577 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 4:04 am

If garmr gets votes, I'd hammer but I still prefer Skitter/Rabid/hectic

Robbnva · Post Post #578 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 4:18 am

In post 540, skitter30 wrote:ok we need to make some sort of progress
VOTE: bob

how does this make progress exactly? Starting a new wagon seems to be the opposite of making progress

skitter30 · Post Post #579 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:38 am

In post 542, Tchill13 wrote:
In post 524, skitter30 wrote:i don't like your garmr push
whats wrong with it.

he's essentially saying the things that are giving me bad gut vibes on garmr. a lot to do with my experience with garmr.

I dont understand it

skitter30 · Post Post #580 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:40 am

In post 546, Garmr wrote:
In post 517, skitter30 wrote:Garmr what's bothering u about tchill?
When he jumped off he voted wake instead of me or hectic. If he was actually concerned with getting reads ect like his trying to portray himself he wouldn't park his slot on a lurker. If he voted me then instead of after I found issue with it or he voted hectic I wouldn't have a problem as he would be wrong but at least consistent. It's like his playing safe instead of finding scum.

Another reason I don't think bob and tchill are scum together as well because of tchill stating his willingness to vote bob in a way like his setting up the lynch.

I dont particularly agree with tchill's approach to the game but his actions line up with the approach he's purporting to take to this game, so i think he's kinda townie

skitter30 · Post Post #581 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:40 am

Also i'm not sure i agree with ur bob/tchill take

skitter30 · Post Post #582 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:42 am

In post 565, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 512, skitter30 wrote:
In post 507, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:If she and tchill are scum, then yes, the switch makes sense, precisely because he is at risk of a lynch going through.
I distance better than that as scum, thank you

The read switcj happened because i suddenly understood his pov and it made sense holistically
Why do people feel the need to say how they would play IF they were scum? Regardless of alignment, such statements are always scummy imo.

Is skitter a player who always talks about what scum!them would do when they are town?

Yes

skitter30 · Post Post #583 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:43 am

In post 578, Robbnva wrote:
In post 540, skitter30 wrote:ok we need to make some sort of progress
VOTE: bob
how does this make progress exactly? Starting a new wagon seems to be the opposite of making progress

Because i want to sort bob abd try to vote someone i think i can actually read

Robbnva · Post Post #584 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:49 am

how does voting bob achieve that? You can't sort by asking questions?

skitter30 · Post Post #585 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:51 am

To try to start sorting him and putting pressure on him, sorting != asking questions ...

Robbnva · Post Post #586 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:06 am

In post 585, skitter30 wrote:To try to start sorting him and putting pressure on him, sorting != asking questions ...

So sort of like what tchill did with wake...

Robbnva · Post Post #587 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:09 am

Sorry I confused you with Garmr. My apologies

Robbnva · Post Post #588 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 6:32 am

That vote does prove what I was saying though. It’s not opportunistic to do that.

skitter30 · Post Post #589 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:10 am

I dont understand what you're trying to say

Robbnva · Post Post #590 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 7:13 am

I thought you were garmr who accused tchill of being opportunistic by voting wake. You have essentially done a similar thing that tchill did and I thought that was hypocritical, but you are obviously not Garmr.

ignore me.

I do wait to see what garmr has to say about your vote. He either has to retract his tchill accusation OR accuse you of being opportunistic.

bob3141 · Post Post #591 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 10:56 am

In post 585, skitter30 wrote:To try to start sorting him and putting pressure on him, sorting != asking questions ...

yet you actualy dont ask any question. You just made a vote

So was that really an attempt to pressure.

skitter30 · Post Post #592 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:00 am

Yes and ?

cyrus62 · Post Post #593 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:16 am

vote count coming

Robbnva · Post Post #594 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:27 am

I’m bob v skitter after skitter said bob is scummy. Bob comes out looking better. Skitter has this problem explaining things which is incredibly scum motivated.

Robbnva · Post Post #595 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:28 am

The fact skitter can’t explain his reads is super red flagish.

Town has to be transparent. Town has to be able to explain themselves. Scum have to hide their reasons.

skitter30 · Post Post #596 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:34 am

Again, i'm a she, can you stop doing that ????

Also, robb, you keep telling me i havent explained my read on you, when i have, at least three times.

What dont you think i've failed to answer, exactly?

At this point i almost feel like you're trying to make me annoyed ...

skitter30 · Post Post #597 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:35 am

*what do u think?

Creature · Post Post #598 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:35 am

In post 593, cyrus62 wrote:
vote count coming

20+ multiposting coming

Creature · Post Post #599 (ISO) » Mon Nov 25, 2019 11:36 am

In post 2, Rabid Schnauzer wrote:Here!

VOTE: Tchill

Man, will I have to deal with this?