In post 3530, RCEnigma wrote: I don't feel uncomfortable about Bambi. Just not as confident in my read there. Idk if you know but Bambi is the best kind of psychopath. I didn't know we were voting in tandem until you said something so that's kind of more a question for Bambi than me no?
You both are weirdos.chkflip wrote:Crazy girls are the best I agree. <3
+1
Maybe he will be breakfasted.
In post 3500, Venus and Mars wrote:Listen guys I have proof that a variant of this role exists n in this setup. Someone. I have no clue who or what alignment, sent me dirty laundry.
StickyFruit Vendor
Spoiler:
At night, you will give your target a "Sticky Fruit". They will be informed that they have received a Sticky Fruit, but not who they received it from. They will be informed that they may pass it along the following night. Any player given a Sticky Fruit will be immune to all actions, EXCEPT for killing actions, the night they receive the fruit.
Actually, his lynch is pretty consensus but still stated to death.In post 3553, Venus and Mars wrote:Honestly it is the best possible outcome for the game state (even if wrong which I honestly don't think it is because I trust Nancy).
It has been fought to death and it will actually be good for analysis imo.
~Venus6
You might want to sit down for this but. We have the same votes.In post 3549, Amrun wrote:Worst voting in the game
In post 3561, RCEnigma wrote:You might want to sit down for this but. We have the same votes.In post 3549, Amrun wrote:Worst voting in the game
Active - both of us. I’m not counting and it was like 75/25 content vs fluff.In post 3541, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Here are some examples:In post 3434, Venus and Mars wrote:What do you mean “how much”? Decent? I have no idea how you want me to answer that.In post 3432, chkflip wrote:Mars, how much conversation between you and Ejet happened in your hood?
- We had 4 pages of back and forth
- We made 12 pages but half of it fluff
- He made 7 posts and I made 45
Something along those lines would be a perfect answer IMHO
In post 3563, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Active - both of us. I’m not counting and it was like 75/25 content vs fluff.In post 3541, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Here are some examples:In post 3434, Venus and Mars wrote:What do you mean “how much”? Decent? I have no idea how you want me to answer that.In post 3432, chkflip wrote:Mars, how much conversation between you and Ejet happened in your hood?
- We had 4 pages of back and forth
- We made 12 pages but half of it fluff
- He made 7 posts and I made 45
Something along those lines would be a perfect answer IMHO
If Shiro wants to, awesome.In post 3564, Venus and Mars wrote:In post 3563, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Active - both of us. I’m not counting and it was like 75/25 content vs fluff.In post 3541, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Here are some examples:In post 3434, Venus and Mars wrote:What do you mean “how much”? Decent? I have no idea how you want me to answer that.In post 3432, chkflip wrote:Mars, how much conversation between you and Ejet happened in your hood?
- We had 4 pages of back and forth
- We made 12 pages but half of it fluff
- He made 7 posts and I made 45
Something along those lines would be a perfect answer IMHO
???In post 3542, Titus wrote:Nothing I said about Drew was role related. All I said was if one of us was unwittingly doing scum's bidding, it will show. It's easy enough to case Drew and I'm tired of fighting and dealing with the double standard.In post 3526, Venus and Mars wrote:VOTE: DrewIn post 3524, Venus and Mars wrote:Are you saying @Titus, that if we don’t vote Drew, we’re going to be some kind of target?
I think Titus is crumbing something here that might involve Drew?
I have no idea what but she’s saying we’re in danger if we don’t vote him or something? I don’t understand this but it may possibly be role related.
this one > enchantress, because you actually have evidence of this based on your abilities not working anymore, right? and the rest - ie. Creature is explained by Expresso flip, so no real evidence of enchantress but if you’re actually right and there actually is one, there’s no real evidence that enchantress targeted A50 anyway.Renegade
Spoiler:
Each night, you may give a modifier (out of a given list) out to a player.This can be a permanent modifieror apply to only the next action.
Nips who was this post directed to?In post 3543, Titus wrote:In post 3533, Emperor flippyNips wrote:In post 3519, Venus and Mars wrote:With his low activity level, I’m worried he may get mislynched without getting the chance to claim.
I’m just legit shocked that Amrun would be onboard for this.
You going to do something other than bitch about being caught or fluff?
Me too. But ehh. I’m still shocked Titus is on this
Titus, A50 says he has a clear on him. This is insanity.In post 3545, Titus wrote:Not exactly. I want whatever gets people to wake up and lynch Flip. I am just tired of fighting. Mislynch whoever. Then I will die faster.In post 3522, chkflip wrote:Uhhh
You don't want to be seen as being against a Drew lynch?
Am I reading that correctly, Titus?
Titus, you are not thinking straight. You’re advocating lynching a slot that a player you have a clear on, A50 - who also has a clear on - Nips is invalid.In post 3546, Titus wrote:At least Drew has a chance to be scum, but I'd look down on any wagon that's not Nips.
If it weren’t for A50’s clear, that would actually be a valid argument but for me: clear > WIFOM - any day of the month.In post 3548, Amrun wrote:@Nancy: I don’t think nips is cleared and I think there’s a lot of reason to think a lot of actions could have effected A50’s result.
He was just feeling really good and spicy to me at the time, but meh, I can acknowledge he’s not the best lynch mechanically until we have more info.
Who the FUCK else would kill espressojet N1 though?
vote: RCE
Fine. Here’s my second spice pick.
I actually think there’s a user account called “no lunch”.
No, I was obviously mistaken, it’s probably a variant of regular fruit vendor - except it’s anonymous - so if it doesn’t actually do anything/confirm a slot. wtfs the point of the role even existing or being used. I have no clue.In post 3556, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3500, Venus and Mars wrote:Listen guys I have proof that a variant of this role exists n in this setup. Someone. I have no clue who or what alignment, sent me dirty laundry.
StickyFruit Vendor
Spoiler:
At night, you will give your target a "Sticky Fruit". They will be informed that they have received a Sticky Fruit, but not who they received it from. They will be informed that they may pass it along the following night. Any player given a Sticky Fruit will be immune to all actions, EXCEPT for killing actions, the night they receive the fruit.
Were you told that you could pass it along the following night?
It's the reality with how this setup is fucking balanced.In post 3569, Venus and Mars wrote:Titus, you are not thinking straight. You’re advocating lynching a slot that a player you have a clear on, A50 - who also has a clear on - Nips is invalid.In post 3546, Titus wrote:At least Drew has a chance to be scum, but I'd look down on any wagon that's not Nips.
Do you seriously not realize how ridiculous that sounds?
How are Joan/RCE even connected?In post 3562, Amrun wrote:In post 3561, RCEnigma wrote:You might want to sit down for this but. We have the same votes.In post 3549, Amrun wrote:Worst voting in the game
Ahaha I know. And it is actually kind of funny. But I know what I’ve been doing and I know I’m not scum. I still think scum is likely to be there somewhere and yours seems likely now that we know some townflips we didn’t know before.
If Joan does turn out to be scum you are definitely not, though.
