Nah, Nickelback references are locktown.In post 4178, Venus and Mars wrote:Did she make any suspicious typos invoking allegiance to the illuminati, Satanic nursery rhymes or Nickleback? If not, I’d say probably not.In post 4177, RCEnigma wrote:Drew are you scumreading Titus or not?
If this is real I want your head.In post 4182, BrightEyedFish wrote:Aww screw it, I guess I have to do this now just to get "involved"
DAYVIG: davesaz
Drew would have been a better choice.In post 4187, BrightEyedFish wrote:Oops.
And what about renegade?In post 3112, Venus and Mars wrote:So you do think there’s an enchantress? What about renegade since Titus thinks both roles exist in this setup.In post 3104, 50 Judge Powers wrote:And now that you know that wasn't it, can you please consider mu proposition? I'll even switch the word "Alien" with a new magical word: ENCHANTER. Same effect though.In post 2992, Venus and Mars wrote:Creature’s ability on you failed because thanks to Expresso death, all cop-like actions fail.
Were you still unaware Creature's ability failed on me at this point?In post 3399, Venus and Mars wrote:@Creature, did you ever say what your flavour was?
What made you change your stance and believe there might be an Enchantress then?In post 3566, Venus and Mars wrote:???In post 3542, Titus wrote:Nothing I said about Drew was role related. All I said was if one of us was unwittingly doing scum's bidding, it will show. It's easy enough to case Drew and I'm tired of fighting and dealing with the double standard.In post 3526, Venus and Mars wrote:VOTE: DrewIn post 3524, Venus and Mars wrote:Are you saying @Titus, that if we don’t vote Drew, we’re going to be some kind of target?
I think Titus is crumbing something here that might involve Drew?
I have no idea what but she’s saying we’re in danger if we don’t vote him or something? I don’t understand this but it may possibly be role related.
There really is no good reason to even think an enchantress exists at this point but I think because you were told you lost your neighbourizing abilities or something? I can’t remember now exactly, my guess would be on
this one > enchantress, because you actually have evidence of this based on your abilities not working anymore, right? and the rest - ie.Renegade
Spoiler:
Each night, you may give a modifier (out of a given list) out to a player.This can be a permanent modifieror apply to only the next action.Creature is explained by Expresso flip, so no real evidence of enchantress but if you’re actually right and there actually is one, there’s no real evidence that enchantress targeted A50 anyway.
So at this point in the game, any pretty much confirmed slots should not even be considered for a lynch. When we get closer to LYLO, we can worry about WIFOM then but that’s still a long way off and unconfirmed scummy looking slots are the most logical way to go.
It was insanity then. Are you hard claiming you've become insane now?In post 3568, Venus and Mars wrote:Titus, A50 says he has a clear on him. This is insanity.In post 3545, Titus wrote:Not exactly. I want whatever gets people to wake up and lynch Flip. I am just tired of fighting. Mislynch whoever. Then I will die faster.In post 3522, chkflip wrote:Uhhh
You don't want to be seen as being against a Drew lynch?
Am I reading that correctly, Titus?
No, this is incorrect. Creature's fail on you means that either he was roleblocked or you were role stopped. No one has claimed enchantress so if there is one, it is probably scum.In post 4199, 50 Judge Powers wrote:You still think this to be true?In post 2992, Venus and Mars wrote:Creature’s ability on you failed because thanks to Expresso death, all cop-like actions fail.In post 2982, 50 Judge Powers wrote:As far as I'm quote up (this post I'm quoting) Nip isn't cleared. I get the feeling I was targeted by an Alien (a combination of Jailkeeper & Rolestopper for those who don't know what an Alien is) and this would be the simplest explanation for why TWO players actions failed on me (assuming Creature is telling the truth). If that's the case, then I was recharged because my action didn't go through due to the JK, and not because my target was not group scum.In post 2694, chkflip wrote:50 needs to make a Goddamn appearance so we know who our 4 off-the-table townies are.
~The brainy one.
Did you mean straight as in direct or did you misspell strait?In post 3569, Venus and Mars wrote:In post 3546, Titus wrote:At least Drew has a chance to be scum, but I'd look down on any wagon that's not Nips.Titus, you are not thinking straight. You’re advocating lynching a slot that a player you have a clear on, A50 - who also has a clear on - Nips is invalid.
Do you seriously not realize how ridiculous that sounds?
In post 4194, Haggle wrote:If I assume she made the errors on purpose, what is scum indicative about that? Because that seems like a leap. I almost flipped out at you for pointing out what may have been a crumb. I'm really not seeing scum indications from that.
BP
What made them stop within the very same dayphase??In post 3581, Venus and Mars wrote:In post 3575, Titus wrote:Creature's ability is a known failure.In post 3566, Venus and Mars wrote:There really is no good reason to even think an enchantress exists at this point but I think because you were told you lost your neighbourizing abilities or something? I can’t remember now exactly, my guess would be on
My neighborize didn't happen, which means either A50 is town or I never targeted him.
Scum targeted me to make me desperate.
A50 targeting Nips means either Nips is town, A50 is scum or A50 was interfered with.
To believe that Nips is clear you must believe
1) There is no enchantress
2) Scum roleblocked Creature over a known investigative in A50.
It makes oodles more sense that scum just sent an enchantress onto A50, regardless of his alignment., so maybe ISO Creature for clues on that and yes, Creature was targeted in Starcraft 1 and NK’d, so why do you think that’s an impossibility? See, yet another reason why Drew isn’t clear because Creature expressed suspicion on him I believe, as well as Nips but only one of them has a potential clear and it isn’t Drew. But Creature had to have been targeted by scum, so yeah - another reason to assume A50 wasn’t.What this is telling me is scum is likely terrified of Creature
So Drew is IC now?In post 4200, Haggle wrote:Nah, Nickelback references are locktown.In post 4178, Venus and Mars wrote:Did she make any suspicious typos invoking allegiance to the illuminati, Satanic nursery rhymes or Nickleback? If not, I’d say probably not.In post 4177, RCEnigma wrote:Drew are you scumreading Titus or not?
BP
No, I think you were targeted. I didn’t understand jd didn’t affect N1 att.In post 4199, 50 Judge Powers wrote:You still think this to be true?In post 2992, Venus and Mars wrote:Creature’s ability on you failed because thanks to Expresso death, all cop-like actions fail.In post 2982, 50 Judge Powers wrote:As far as I'm quote up (this post I'm quoting) Nip isn't cleared. I get the feeling I was targeted by an Alien (a combination of Jailkeeper & Rolestopper for those who don't know what an Alien is) and this would be the simplest explanation for why TWO players actions failed on me (assuming Creature is telling the truth). If that's the case, then I was recharged because my action didn't go through due to the JK, and not because my target was not group scum.In post 2694, chkflip wrote:50 needs to make a Goddamn appearance so we know who our 4 off-the-table townies are.
~The brainy one.
Creature’s action on you failed but only you claimed on D1.In post 4203, 50 Judge Powers wrote:And what about renegade?In post 3112, Venus and Mars wrote:So you do think there’s an enchantress? What about renegade since Titus thinks both roles exist in this setup.In post 3104, 50 Judge Powers wrote:And now that you know that wasn't it, can you please consider mu proposition? I'll even switch the word "Alien" with a new magical word: ENCHANTER. Same effect though.In post 2992, Venus and Mars wrote:Creature’s ability on you failed because thanks to Expresso death, all cop-like actions fail.
I knew it failed, I just misunderstood that it had nothing to do with jd.In post 4204, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Were you still unaware Creature's ability failed on me at this point?In post 3399, Venus and Mars wrote:@Creature, did you ever say what your flavour was?
Are you making a typo joke or something? Yeah, duh! of course I meant the body of water.In post 4208, 50 Judge Powers wrote:Did you mean straight as in direct or did you misspell strait?In post 3569, Venus and Mars wrote:In post 3546, Titus wrote:At least Drew has a chance to be scum, but I'd look down on any wagon that's not Nips.Titus, you are not thinking straight. You’re advocating lynching a slot that a player you have a clear on, A50 - who also has a clear on - Nips is invalid.
Do you seriously not realize how ridiculous that sounds?
Because Creature targeted you. Before knowing that, enchantress theory made 0 sense.In post 4205, 50 Judge Powers wrote:What made you change your stance and believe there might be an Enchantress then?In post 3566, Venus and Mars wrote:???In post 3542, Titus wrote:Nothing I said about Drew was role related. All I said was if one of us was unwittingly doing scum's bidding, it will show. It's easy enough to case Drew and I'm tired of fighting and dealing with the double standard.In post 3526, Venus and Mars wrote:VOTE: DrewIn post 3524, Venus and Mars wrote:Are you saying @Titus, that if we don’t vote Drew, we’re going to be some kind of target?
I think Titus is crumbing something here that might involve Drew?
I have no idea what but she’s saying we’re in danger if we don’t vote him or something? I don’t understand this but it may possibly be role related.
There really is no good reason to even think an enchantress exists at this point but I think because you were told you lost your neighbourizing abilities or something? I can’t remember now exactly, my guess would be on
this one > enchantress, because you actually have evidence of this based on your abilities not working anymore, right? and the rest - ie.Renegade
Spoiler:
Each night, you may give a modifier (out of a given list) out to a player.This can be a permanent modifieror apply to only the next action.Creature is explained by Expresso flip, so no real evidence of enchantress but if you’re actually right and there actually is one, there’s no real evidence that enchantress targeted A50 anyway.
So at this point in the game, any pretty much confirmed slots should not even be considered for a lynch. When we get closer to LYLO, we can worry about WIFOM then but that’s still a long way off and unconfirmed scummy looking slots are the most logical way to go.
You claimed D1, Creature didn’t iirc and his actions on you failed, so occams razor.In post 4210, 50 Judge Powers wrote:What made them stop within the very same dayphase??In post 3581, Venus and Mars wrote:In post 3575, Titus wrote:Creature's ability is a known failure.In post 3566, Venus and Mars wrote:There really is no good reason to even think an enchantress exists at this point but I think because you were told you lost your neighbourizing abilities or something? I can’t remember now exactly, my guess would be on
My neighborize didn't happen, which means either A50 is town or I never targeted him.
Scum targeted me to make me desperate.
A50 targeting Nips means either Nips is town, A50 is scum or A50 was interfered with.
To believe that Nips is clear you must believe
1) There is no enchantress
2) Scum roleblocked Creature over a known investigative in A50.
It makes oodles more sense that scum just sent an enchantress onto A50, regardless of his alignment., so maybe ISO Creature for clues on that and yes, Creature was targeted in Starcraft 1 and NK’d, so why do you think that’s an impossibility? See, yet another reason why Drew isn’t clear because Creature expressed suspicion on him I believe, as well as Nips but only one of them has a potential clear and it isn’t Drew. But Creature had to have been targeted by scum, so yeah - another reason to assume A50 wasn’t.What this is telling me is scum is likely terrified of Creature
I do! Your contributions are less than what I like it almost smells fishy. I mean, you look like you don't want to piss in anyone's pool. You're not involved in any monkey business, are you? Thinking about more puns to include in this post is driving me bananas..In post 3976, BrightEyedFish wrote:Does anyone have any questions for me?
Which was?In post 4213, 50 Judge Powers wrote:OK, I think my point has been made abundantly clear even Stevie Wonder, Ray Charles, and Helen Keller saw it! I'ma stop being silly now.
