I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 32, Hectic wrote:Did you make that decision before or after receiving your role PM?
before
In post 32, Hectic wrote:What troubles me is him asking for our opinion on claiming targets in advance, rather than giving his own. Given you read HALF a game through, I'd have thought you'd have some opinions of your own, right? I do love your fur though, so I hope we can still be acquainted.
I have some thoughts but I didn't want to just lead with it, wanted to see if people had their own to share. My gut tells me it'd be significantly useful to know who targeted who ahead of time so we know what the dead did - it restricts scums fakeclaiming space - and there's not as much way scum could manipulate it tonight since they don't have any information about which doctor is which either. however, I can see how later game it may let scum deduce which doctor is which before the town can. so I'm kinda torn, my vote is maybe on advance claiming but I still want to survey the past games to see how that either worked out or backfired
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes
idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?
i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?
my jake votes kinda serious tho
But why was it serious?
because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?
Is that good evidence for me being scum, or "look at the trees" evidence?
I don't like this question, asking whether there's "good evidence" is trying to lawyer against a scumread on him instead of sorting emps in return or helping emps resolve concerns about his play.
VOTE: Jake
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 104, Iconeum wrote:@GL, that's not how I read that return question from Jake tho. I kinda liked it?
I'm prob didn't explain it well cause I'm kinda tired but I def don't like it, there's never going to be "good" evidence for someone being scum in early D1 and people just vote what feels kinda scummy. Jake trying to argue with it in the way that he did doesn't feel like it's meant to do anything useful, rather it's just kinda defensive and the mindset of "don't push without good evidence" discourages further content being generated.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 79, emps wrote:i think both were pretty obviously jokes
idk that your jake vote was obviously a joke, I'm not sure it was 'serious' but it seemed like a normal push?
i was talking about both hectic votes because i kind of voted hectic twice?
my jake votes kinda serious tho
But why was it serious?
because your jokes felt forced/overly formal?
Is that good evidence for me being scum, or "look at the trees" evidence?
I don't like this question, asking whether there's "good evidence" is trying to lawyer against a scumread on him instead of sorting emps in return or helping emps resolve concerns about his play.
VOTE: Jake
If there is no good evidence, then why would you push for me being scum? All you're accusing me of is making a joke and questioning your reasons, and you respond with "You must be scum because how else could you explain this"
Not really game relevant but is anyone interested in spamming the shit out of this game, but leave the pagetops for our beloved mod and see just how many medical memes she made?
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 110, Iconeum wrote:Not really game relevant but is anyone interested in spamming the shit out of this game, but leave the pagetops for our beloved mod and see just how many medical memes she made?
In post 110, Iconeum wrote:Not really game relevant but is anyone interested in spamming the shit out of this game, but leave the pagetops for our beloved mod and see just how many medical memes she made?
Plz no
I'm thinking in the lines of +- 50 posts/player/irl day
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 109, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If there is no good evidence, then why would you push for me being scum?
what do you suggest we do instead to try to sort people, especially in the early game?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 109, Jake The Wolfie wrote:If there is no good evidence, then why would you push for me being scum?
what do you suggest we do instead to try to sort people, especially in the early game?
Talk about who our potential targets for protection are.
You're playing significantly differently so far to this newbie game: viewtopic.php?f=11&t=81457&start=50
You're joking around early there too, but it was while pushing/sorting people, and asking people to elaborate on reads often. You had some nice thoughts in this post.