Secret Hitler (Liberal victory!)

[Ausuka]

it's strategy pine

"Strategy" smells like "I'm RC and only my opinion matters, so I'll bully others into doing what I want in the most self-aggrandizing way possible"

It's not bullying it's just that rc has passed 2 liberal cards so far which makes him a good president because I think generally speaking libs are most likely to pass libs.

[RadiantCowbells]

that is really simplistic reasoning @korina

same question to NAJON

ok here's the thing guys

EVEN IF no one lied about anything thus far there is still a very high probability that the next flip comes up 3f just based on the amount of libs that have already flipped

[Korina]

Najon jaing that is weird regardless. Pine is ok to ja his own prop, but not Najon.

pedit: Yea, that's fine. I'm 99.9% sure you're lib, so it's whatever. We still have two lib left in the deck.

[NotAJumbleOfNumbers]

Najon why did you like that nomination?

so that we can get more info on them because neither one of them has been up yet i think

[Korina]

No, that's bad. You want less hands touching the deck, not more. The more that touch, the more that can be dropped.

[Korina]

If three people touch, and how many blues that show up are wrong, we have smaller of a pool than say five.

[RadiantCowbells]

forgive my not understanding the game for a second: when does the deck get shuffled again? after 2 more policies?

[NotAJumbleOfNumbers]

No, that's bad. You want less hands touching the deck, not more. The more that touch, the more that can be dropped.

but it's still the same amount of hands touching?

[NotAJumbleOfNumbers]

*same amount of times touched

[Datisi]

3 MINUTES

[Ircher]

pine is a new hand @jumble

[Korina]

We should only really have new people touch if we find a fasc within the four who've touched. That's why I nom'd RC as well.

pedit: No.
NAJON, Ircher, Korina, RC, Pine, Ausuka would've touched versus NAJON, Ircher, Korina, RC.

[Korina]

all players touch that, versus four.

[Ircher]

I think RC should nom Ausuka.

[Korina]

Actually I think Ausuka played, so, five hands versus six. It's marginally better for libs to not have pine play that.

[RadiantCowbells]

i think i'm going to

give najon another shot

since 1) involved in the passage of a lib policy 2) can't pass the other person who is 3) if they're town that means there's a reasonably high chance of getting another lib card and if not it would be useful to know

Nominate: NAJON

[NotAJumbleOfNumbers]

i was kinda unclear on my response so let me restate this:
isn't the deck touched the same amount of times anyways

[Datisi]

vote pres RC chance najon

[Ircher]

fair enough

[Ausuka]

Ok i *think* we have 6 fascs and 3 libs left? Assuming we're all honest. So 3f is possible but it seems more likely we'll get a liberal (I tried to do something and it came out 12%) unless i did something wrong? Obviously there's a decent chance it's higher and someone lied but

[Korina]

Yes, but the less people who touch the deck, the better.

We have seventeen cards, and if we have five people draw from it, there's more chances to lose cards, versus say three people drawing from it.

[Ausuka]

I played but unless Ircher is also fasc and is covering for me it shouldn't have an impact on my alignment since Ircher claimed 3f.

[Korina]

5R, 3B @Ausuka

[RadiantCowbells]

there is a fairly good odds

that exactly 1/3 of them buried a lib secretly

so we're actually looking at 2/7

[Korina]

RRB
RRR
RBB