mini 2126: the game is OVRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Alchemist21 · Post Post #750 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:39 am

In post 747, Auro wrote:
In post 746, Alchemist21 wrote:I think this is a good place to start.
Reasons?

It's not a solid feeling but it feels like you're trying to start a NKA discussion to lead Town to the wrong conclusions about why Firebringer was killed.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #751 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:40 am

Penguin you were supposed to take that page top.

Auro · Post Post #752 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:41 am

Interesting that you'd rather just vote me directly instead of seeing where I would "lead" town to first.

Auro · Post Post #753 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:41 am

And as town who thinks the Fire NKA is a good lead, what do you think I would do, Alchie?

PenguinPower · Post Post #754 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:42 am

In post 749, Auro wrote:VOTE: Alchemist34

Reasons?

Auro · Post Post #755 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:43 am

In post 746, Alchemist21 wrote:I think this is a good place to start.

Pings scummy, also

Auro wrote:Interesting that you'd rather just vote me directly instead of seeing where I would "lead" town to first.

Alchemist21 · Post Post #756 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:43 am

In post 752, Auro wrote:Interesting that you'd rather just vote me directly instead of seeing where I would "lead" town to first.

Why would it matter? I wouldn't trust any conclusion about the Firebringer kill.

PenguinPower · Post Post #757 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:43 am

Oh...I didn't really care. I was just being snarky.

Auro · Post Post #758 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:44 am

Cause the reason behind your scumread would stay the same, but with more content from me that either affirms I'm trying to direct town to a lynch, or that I'm actually considering it

Alchemist21 · Post Post #759 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:47 am

In post 753, Auro wrote:And as town who thinks the Fire NKA is a good lead, what do you think I would do, Alchie?

I think you'd just go ahead and give the conclusion of your own personal analysis rather than host an open discussion that that would give scum into the Town's opinions and help them steer them the wrong way.

Instead of saying what you think, you're looking for what everyone else thinks and I think that could be because you're scum trying to get a feel for the room.

OkaPoka · Post Post #760 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:47 am

why werent u fighting me like this auro

Auro · Post Post #761 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:48 am

In post 760, OkaPoka wrote:why werent u fighting me like this auro

A naked vote was fine, but Alch's justification of his vote was bad

Auro · Post Post #762 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:50 am

In post 759, Alchemist21 wrote:I think you'd just go ahead and give the conclusion of your own personal analysis

I did give one conclusion from personal analysis: that we could weakly PoE players who Fire specifically dragged to play, since I don't think they would kill him N1
What personal analysis can I make of who Fire has good reads on?
What other personal analysis can I make? I looked at the ISO loosely already; there's nothing much there.
And even then, why would the question above be a bad starting point?

Auro · Post Post #763 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:51 am

In post 762, Auro wrote:What personal analysis can I make of who Fire has good reads on?

Without knowing that information myself* btw, I don't really have much experience with Fire at all.

RCEnigma · Post Post #764 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:51 am

I think listening to pine voters until that wagon is better resolved is a bad idea.

So this 1v1 isn't important imo.

Auro · Post Post #765 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:52 am

Don't think the Pine wagon matters too much for reasons Okapoka already stated; no one was actually expecting Comical/Eddie Cane to yolo hammer there
Wagon analysis is sort of moot

PenguinPower · Post Post #766 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:52 am

How do we better resolve it?

Auro · Post Post #767 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:53 am

In post 764, RCEnigma wrote:that wagon is better resolved

Explain.

RCEnigma · Post Post #768 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:55 am

Vote people off the island.

In some order of Dann, comical, auro.

Auro · Post Post #769 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:56 am

You're really going to go for "this is a scum-driven wagon" etc logic for the Pine wagon?

OkaPoka · Post Post #770 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:58 am

In post 768, RCEnigma wrote:Vote people off the island.

In some order of Dann, comical, auro.

why is the one person who is most responsible suspiciously off the list

Auro · Post Post #771 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:59 am

At least he didn't exclude Comical from his vote pool too

Alchemist21 · Post Post #772 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:02 am

In post 762, Auro wrote:I did give one conclusion from personal analysis: that we could weakly PoE players who Fire specifically dragged to play, since I don't think they would kill him N1

That was given in response to the number of posts saying Fire was the reason they joined.

What personal analysis can I make of who Fire has good reads on?

I don't expect any N1 NKA to be good tbh because of how many different reasons someone could be killed. It's not really the lack of NKA from you that bothers me, it's you trying to see other's in a way that I think is highly open to manipulation. If it really was just because you don't have much experience with FB, then fine I'm wrong.

What other personal analysis can I make? I looked at the ISO loosely already; there's nothing much there.

It's not really true that there's nothing there in Fire's ISO. There's scumreads on you, Dannfloor, and myself. It's enough that someone who wanted to could try to make an analysis, but again it's not the actual lack of analysis that bothers me here.

OkaPoka · Post Post #773 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:02 am

the only nka is that eddie wasnt killed wtf

Auro · Post Post #774 (ISO) » Mon Mar 23, 2020 9:03 am

In post 772, Alchemist21 wrote:It's not really true that there's nothing there in Fire's ISO. There's scumreads on you

Have you read the ISO right now to verify that?
If you haven't, read it again - do you stick by this?