skitter30 standing V/LA Fridays and Saturdays & mental health V/LA.
Luca Blight V/LA weekend.
[/area]
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
I think it's a legit claim, most likely, you probably aren't the kind to make a massive gambit claim like that even as scum
there probably are some implications to your claim when it comes to gamedesign
trying to reduce my paranoia towards my hood and whatnot
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
Recently I've started to realize that a lot of my null reads in mafia games ended up being scum and that I should start scumhunting the same way I play cop or vig
if I was cop or vig I would either check Quag or Ald here, so maybe I should vote there
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
It doesn’t make sense to me how you hard SR me based on virtually nothing, and yet have no real suspicion of Quags after what looked like a really opportunistic hop onto my wagon.
In post 217, nomnomnom wrote:I've only seen his play through modding C9++ so no direct experience
He was scum that game and if memory serves well he opened pretty seriously, at least I don't remember him doing anything extravagant, probably would have not forgotten it otherwise
Also I'm sheeping Furret's push because I want his reactions
hmm ok. i think i kinda see nom's push there from a town perspective, even if the logic is bad. like i can see why a townie might be thrown off by that kind of entrance, especially considering that iconeum isn't even in this game. i don't think scum would really pay it much mind.
wasn't really impressed with luca's 208. i feel like if he actually believed in his read on noms he'd have voted there to try and start a wagon. instead he waited until noms pointed out that he hadn't.
looker's vote on noms feels more like it's driven by personal shit instead of actual reasons why they think noms is scum. regardless of looker's alignment, it's a bad vote (although i don't think it says much wrt looker's alignment)
tentative VOTE: luca blight because i'm interested to see where this wagon goes.
Like these posts definitely don't feel opportunistic to me
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
In post 407, nomnomnom wrote:Recently I've started to realize that a lot of my null reads in mafia games ended up being scum and that I should start scumhunting the same way I play cop or vig
if I was cop or vig I would either check Quag or Ald here, so maybe I should vote there
In post 411, nomnomnom wrote:Maybe I'm biased but I don't see it as opportunistic
What makes it opportunistic from your POV?
Also it definitely wasn't nothing.
For a hard SR is was nothing.
Your point about the townreads was objectively wrong. Giving TR’s for no reason can be a scumrell, but two light townreads early on? Never in the history of Mafia is that a scumtell, no matter how you dress it up.
Not voting you after my case was justified by the fact almost half the player list had barely posted, and my vote would have put you to l-2.
wasn't really impressed with luca's 208. i feel like if he actually believed in his read on noms he'd have voted there to try and start a wagon. instead he waited until noms pointed out that he hadn't.
looker's vote on noms feels more like it's driven by personal shit instead of actual reasons why they think noms is scum. regardless of looker's alignment, it's a bad vote (although i don't think it says much wrt looker's alignment)
tentative VOTE: luca blight because i'm interested to see where this wagon goes.
In post 324, Luca Blight wrote:I actually didn’t hop on her though? Which is ironically a stick she’s using to attack me. I pointed out things I didn’t like and was waiting to get a read on everyone before committing to a vote.
Why is it hard to believe that I could genuinely see her as scummy, as opposed to being opportunistic scum?
you didn't wait until you had a read on everyone though, you voted directly after it was pointed out that you hadn't voted there.
pedit: didn't realize that was l-1 whoops
Doesn’t realise his vote made it L-1, but doesn’t unvote, so how the hell is that a tentative vote? He also tries to justify his vote my misrepping me (i didn’t vote Nom directly after she pointed it out, that is evident)