skitter30 standing V/LA Fridays and Saturdays & mental health V/LA.
Luca Blight V/LA weekend.
[/area]
Last edited by Datisi on Fri Mar 27, 2020 5:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
It's not about who the townread themselves (aside from your townread on Ald earlier which I didn't get at all)
it's about how I perceived them as you had no conviction about them and that you only had a case on me as conviction, which felt like not your towngame
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
But you’ve expressed you’re townreads with the exact same conviction with which i expressed them? And mine were just after RVS where a lack of conviction is more excusable.
I see what you mean
I like to think I'm able to detail my reads if need be
I just end up spamposting a lot and writing walls after walls so I prefer to state my opinions clearly and just detail if I'm asked to detail
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
In post 482, nomnomnom wrote:I see what you mean
I like to think I'm able to detail my reads if need be
I just end up spamposting a lot and writing walls after walls so I prefer to state my opinions clearly and just detail if I'm asked to detail
That’s fine and I’m similar in that regard, but you weren’t interested in why I had those Tr’s - you never even asked me. You just focused on framing it as scummy.
I would think it's stupid considered I talked about my reads earlier in the thread, both on Heaven and Furret
You're ignoring my past discussions about those slots, what I did with you was only reiterating my reads without adding anything
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
S {Quag | Heaven/Nom | Aldus/Skitter/Menal | Captain/Luca}T
you have me as your strongest scum read yet you vote for noms? explain that for me
No one is scum alone. Besides, with D1's track record, it'd probably stay a vanity wagon.
In post 342, Quagsire wrote:looker's vote on noms feels more like it's driven by personal shit instead of actual reasons why they think noms is scum.
Are you purposely feeding into her narrative? It's expected for Nom to insult me, but not really you.
okay but you're not even trying to push me or question my stances. like it's not really a vanity when we still have time for other wagons to form. so if you think i'm scum, then you should be pushing me or trying to start a wagon on me, especially when others have expressed concerns about me.
i wasn't insulting you but okay. my point on your noms vote still stands.
I'm really not good sorting by logic
sometimes when I ask people's reads I feel like I make no progress
I definitely prefer judging by reaction and I wanted your reaction to me going aggro on you
Wow you're so good at avoiding death and killing slots that are not part of the informed minority. Wow how are you so good at playing this game.
In post 382, nomnomnom wrote:My main gripe with Luca's claim is that if he's really neap the fact that I'm neighbor with furret creates a lot of false positives, and I'm not sure if this is deliberate game design or just a fakeclaim
but it sure does feel like a fakeclaim, especially considering that neighbors aren't that much power and straight up delve into negative utility territory if we actually have a neap this game
so luca claimed macho neap and you are in a hood with furret
if true that claim probably does fit from a game design perspective. however i think it does ~slightly~ increase the chance that someone in the hood is scum.
if it's not a fake claim, then him claiming the macho probably guarantees that he dies. either way i'm not lynching that claim
I already explained that: you made negative comments about Nom and none about me until I was suspected, hence it ‘seemed’ as though you sided with me as opposed to with Nom.
In post 494, Luca Blight wrote:I already explained that: you made negative comments about Nom and none about me until I was suspected, hence it ‘seemed’ as though you sided with me as opposed to with Nom.
i did make negative comments about nom, but i ultimately ended up townreading her (still do). you were null for me up until that point.
In post 469, Looker wrote:I find it virtually impossible to believe anything. With the end result, scum could just as easily be Luca and nom. Besides, until we have a flip, most of this is fluff and bullshit anyway. You feed into your own paranoia while the actual scum just sit and watch. It's mildly irritating.
Heaven is being replaced for inactivity. If he posts before I find someone, he can stay.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”