skitter30 standing V/LA Fridays and Saturdays & mental health V/LA.
Luca Blight V/LA weekend.
[/area]
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 522, skitter30 wrote:well it wasn't the fact that he wanted l-1's it's more the fact that he was provoking a lolhammer/indicated he was fine with that happening
hey how much (recent) mafia experience do you have?
I took a long break, but I've completed 3 town games recently + some marathon games.
My impression is that nom has been somewhat emotional/confrontational which has attracted votes but I don't think there's scum motive. Why try to provoke Luca into a 1v1 instead of deflecting? In a Luca vs. nom battle I think Luca is more likely to win and I think nom knows that as scum. As town, if she thinks Luca's scum then it might be an uphill battle but at least she's pursuing scum.
I don't agree with what she's said about Luca, but I can see the reasoning behind it. And like I've said previously, I don't think nom was "coasting" on the menalque wagon because she was engaging with him.
CLICK HERE FOR THE ALDUSKKEL APPRECIATION PAGE
"i've only known aldus for four and a half months but if anything happened to him i would kill everyone in this room and then myself" -Datisi, March 28 2020
Avatar made by Brandi.
In post 488, Quagsire wrote:okay but you're not even trying to push me or question my stances. like it's not really a vanity when we still have time for other wagons to form. so if you think i'm scum, then you should be pushing me or trying to start a wagon on me, especially when others have expressed concerns about me.
i wasn't insulting you but okay. my point on your noms vote still stands.
Your suggestions are suggestions. I'm not going to fake some fabricated conviction to get others to vote you. This is a gambling game and I'm gambling.
VOTE: Luca Blight
what? why would you have to fabricate convictions when i'm supposedly your
top scumread
? like surely you must have reasons for that. i feel like you'd be trying a little harder to lynch me if you actually believed that i was scum.
In post 521, skitter30 wrote:wait where did the quag scumread come from?
why are you scumreading heaven, i think the slot is townie for him
and new post now
I felt like people were ignoring him but the wagons he jumped on always made it to L-1/L-2 (Heaven, Luca). I don't remember Heaven; you've been gone for a while. I probably thought he was lurking on purpose.
In post 488, Quagsire wrote:okay but you're not even trying to push me or question my stances. like it's not really a vanity when we still have time for other wagons to form. so if you think i'm scum, then you should be pushing me or trying to start a wagon on me, especially when others have expressed concerns about me.
i wasn't insulting you but okay. my point on your noms vote still stands.
Your suggestions are suggestions. I'm not going to fake some fabricated conviction to get others to vote you. This is a gambling game and I'm gambling.
VOTE: Luca Blight
what? why would you have to fabricate convictions when i'm supposedly your
top scumread
? like surely you must have reasons for that. i feel like you'd be trying a little harder to lynch me if you actually believed that i was scum.
VOTE: looker
Just because you bold something doesn't mean it's important, and I could care less how you feel when it comes to my playstyle. I play with my flip in mind, so make sure this little pseudo-OMGUS is worth it. This is either unfounded confidence (like most of D1), or scum strategy.
@Alduskkel: How offensive. Just what does being "disgusting" entail?
S {Quag | Heaven/Nom | Aldus/Skitter/Menal | Captain/Luca}T
you have me as your strongest scum read yet you vote for noms? explain that for me
No one is scum alone. Besides, with D1's track record, it'd probably stay a vanity wagon.
In post 342, Quagsire wrote:looker's vote on noms feels more like it's driven by personal shit instead of actual reasons why they think noms is scum.
Are you purposely feeding into her narrative? It's expected for Nom to insult me, but not really you.
okay but you're not even trying to push me or question my stances. like it's not really a vanity when we still have time for other wagons to form. so if you think i'm scum, then you should be pushing me or trying to start a wagon on me, especially when others have expressed concerns about me.
i wasn't insulting you but okay. my point on your noms vote still stands.
In post 382, nomnomnom wrote:My main gripe with Luca's claim is that if he's really neap the fact that I'm neighbor with furret creates a lot of false positives, and I'm not sure if this is deliberate game design or just a fakeclaim
but it sure does feel like a fakeclaim, especially considering that neighbors aren't that much power and straight up delve into negative utility territory if we actually have a neap this game
so luca claimed macho neap and you are in a hood with furret
if true that claim probably does fit from a game design perspective. however i think it does ~slightly~ increase the chance that someone in the hood is scum.
if it's not a fake claim, then him claiming the macho probably guarantees that he dies. either way i'm not lynching that claim
In post 504, Quagsire wrote:ok i'll see what e has to say regarding that then. i'm not great at setup spec. i'm not really sure i townread furret though tbh.
ik im town
noms? haven't thought about it
been mostly designing game all day