claimed miller and uncc'd target of scum debuff?In post 3497, RCEnigma wrote:Krazy is claimed miller
-K
claimed miller and uncc'd target of scum debuff?In post 3497, RCEnigma wrote:Krazy is claimed miller
Hard TR. I thought overnight that the inconsistency between chk and KK was problematic and might have meant KK was lying, but now he's admitted to misreading that's not so much a thing.In post 3504, sore feet wrote:@fonz, what are your thoughts on chkflip?
i wanted the sticky ability claimed, which he has doneIn post 3507, The Fonz wrote:Do you still want BTE specifically to claim?
okay.In post 3507, The Fonz wrote:Hard TR. I thought overnight that the inconsistency between chk and KK was problematic and might have meant KK was lying, but now he's admitted to misreading that's not so much a thing.
The only thing is that Titus is *aggressively* aware of the rule of three and brings it up all the time.In post 3509, chkflip wrote:A lot of Titus' early posting about the Auro/Chronos/me posts look like they were setting up a future bus if they had to.
My vote's in the right place. Cool cool cool.
Well, I suspect Chronos anyway as detailed above. I'm off to work, let's just do this.In post 3513, chkflip wrote:Right, which explains why she didn't mention all three of us again and stuck with Auro/me in later posts. People slip all the time, man.
Nothing specificIn post 3511, sore feet wrote:no
if theres something you'd like me to ask i can aggressively prod him?
So I was feeling this too. Is there some reason that we're dropping it?In post 3498, jjh927 wrote:What if it was a "there's a guilty" bus followed by the realisation that mechanics in this game are fucky and he might not have to bus?In post 3494, Michael Scott wrote:I don't think George voting that fast and then unvoting awkwardly would be a Titus neg-associative plan.In post 3492, davesaz wrote:Scum Titus is experienced enough to use the situation to try to lay down negative associations with a partner.
In post 3508, sore feet wrote:i wanted the sticky ability claimed, which he has doneIn post 3507, The Fonz wrote:Do you still want BTE specifically to claim?
my suspicion was he was a global sticky vendor, but not everyone claimed a sticky so i wanted the exact nature of the ability made explicit
if there is more to his role then no, he need not claim
Why do you think it's low-hanging fruit?In post 3520, chkflip wrote:Real disappointed you're going for low-hanging fruit, dave.