I mean if you faked a guilty, then yes.In post 2595, Auro wrote:Do I actually seem all over the place here, though?
You've done a 360. You haven't evolved.In post 2626, Comical wrote:My reads evolve.
In post 2622, PenguinPower wrote:You aren't this though.In post 2617, Comical wrote:You threatening to kill a confirmed investigative is scummy.
You claimed this.
More like whiplash.In post 2603, OkaPoka wrote:im getting a headache from reading your posts boon
Why should I answer this now, when what I said about Alch leaking associatives still holds true if I do have a guilty?In post 2616, Something_Smart wrote:So is it a guilty or not?
Well, unless you're scum with RCE, but that's tinfoil upon tinfoil and should be obvious come massclaim anyway.In post 2628, Comical wrote:Nope, I am confirmed Investigative. No other way I would have known RCE had a gun. Doesn’t confirm me as town, but I am confirmed investigative
In post 2627, PenguinPower wrote:You've done a 360. You haven't evolved.In post 2626, Comical wrote:My reads evolve.
You're throwing spaghetti at a wall.
Because you just warned him about it...In post 2630, Auro wrote:Why should I answer this now, when what I said about Alch leaking associatives still holds true if I do have a guilty?
We 100% do.In post 2631, PenguinPower wrote:WE DON'T KNOW HE HAS A GUN BOON
I behaved as though I had one, which is ≠ faking one; also, if I did, how is that "all over the place"? My play has been consistent with itIn post 2625, Something_Smart wrote:I mean if you faked a guilty, then yes.
And if you sat on a guilty through all the stuff that happened this day phase including two L-1 wagons that very nearly got hammered, then also yes.
Because there’s too many surface level thinking here, that I have to repeat and time and time again call it out because people can’t even see it. :shrug:In post 2635, PenguinPower wrote:Fuck off with your surface level shit. It's tired.
if you're both scum all bets are off as to the truth of what you are saying, he doesn't have to be a mafia doctorIn post 2637, Comical wrote:The only possible way he doesn’t have a gun is if him and I are both scum and he is a Maf Doctor.
In post 2638, PenguinPower wrote:Ugh...I should have left when I said I would.
I'm so sick of this Boon.
In post 2641, northsidegal wrote:if you're both scum all bets are off as to the truth of what you are saying, he doesn't have to be a mafia doctorIn post 2637, Comical wrote:The only possible way he doesn’t have a gun is if him and I are both scum and he is a Maf Doctor.
You don't have a guilty.In post 2630, Auro wrote:Why should I answer this now, when what I said about Alch leaking associatives still holds true if I do have a guilty?In post 2616, Something_Smart wrote:So is it a guilty or not?
No..we can't play the game when you're here unless we play it your way and it's fucking annoying.In post 2642, Comical wrote:In post 2638, PenguinPower wrote:Ugh...I should have left when I said I would.
I'm so sick of this Boon.
Shouldn’t have threatened the Vig shot then.
Im seeing that as scum indicative here, and at this point, it’s even beneficial if you end up flipping town here too.
It was also my intention that he believe that when I had softed it then.In post 2634, Something_Smart wrote:Because you just warned him about it...In post 2630, Auro wrote:Why should I answer this now, when what I said about Alch leaking associatives still holds true if I do have a guilty?
Sure, but we can do that after he posts more, too. Associations babyyyyyyyIn post 2636, Something_Smart wrote:And because if you have a guilty on Alch, then we can lynch him today and kill scum?
I mean, the main point is that he always has a gun unless he's a mafia doctor and boon is lying.In post 2641, northsidegal wrote:if you're both scum all bets are off as to the truth of what you are saying, he doesn't have to be a mafia doctorIn post 2637, Comical wrote:The only possible way he doesn’t have a gun is if him and I are both scum and he is a Maf Doctor.
