A vote there to prove your conviction would be nice.In post 272, Madoka wrote:I think we should lynch ddl.
What??In post 324, Tet wrote:But that was for A50 specifically.
Do you want to be A50?
This line comes off as a whole lot of nonsense.In post 320, Tet wrote:Just saying I think Hiraki is scum doesn't get me to my end goal of identifying town unfortunately. And in a game where many slots are making a case for why they should be lynched instead of projecting that they are in fact town, it's important to find a distinction. Or at least separate slots that are doing so because they are simply scum from the ones that are doing so intentionally. The latter likely being town.In post 318, Battle Mage wrote:This is a remarkably safe post - if you were short on time, it would probably have been quicker to say what you thought, rather than go to the effort of talking around it. Tet-Hiraki scumpair could work, but would require Orange to be town.
Who is scum?In post 328, Battle Mage wrote:Tet - I'd vote you for being so opaque if I hadn't already found scum for today!
In post 329, DkKoba wrote:This line comes off as a whole lot of nonsense.In post 320, Tet wrote:Just saying I think Hiraki is scum doesn't get me to my end goal of identifying town unfortunately. And in a game where many slots are making a case for why they should be lynched instead of projecting that they are in fact town, it's important to find a distinction. Or at least separate slots that are doing so because they are simply scum from the ones that are doing so intentionally. The latter likely being town.In post 318, Battle Mage wrote:This is a remarkably safe post - if you were short on time, it would probably have been quicker to say what you thought, rather than go to the effort of talking around it. Tet-Hiraki scumpair could work, but would require Orange to be town.
Hiraki I think. Possibly Tet too. Probably others. I could ask you a million questions, but:In post 330, DkKoba wrote:Who is scum?In post 328, Battle Mage wrote:Tet - I'd vote you for being so opaque if I hadn't already found scum for today!
In what way? Or do you really mean it doesn't seem genuine?In post 329, DkKoba wrote:This line comes off as a whole lot of nonsense.In post 320, Tet wrote:Just saying I think Hiraki is scum doesn't get me to my end goal of identifying town unfortunately. And in a game where many slots are making a case for why they should be lynched instead of projecting that they are in fact town, it's important to find a distinction. Or at least separate slots that are doing so because they are simply scum from the ones that are doing so intentionally. The latter likely being town.In post 318, Battle Mage wrote:This is a remarkably safe post - if you were short on time, it would probably have been quicker to say what you thought, rather than go to the effort of talking around it. Tet-Hiraki scumpair could work, but would require Orange to be town.
Are you even reading the game?In post 336, Battle Mage wrote:Not keen on either Orange or Allomancer - does anyone have a good reason for voting for them?
it seems genuinely scummyIn post 334, Tet wrote:In what way? Or do you really mean it doesn't seem genuine?In post 329, DkKoba wrote:This line comes off as a whole lot of nonsense.In post 320, Tet wrote:Just saying I think Hiraki is scum doesn't get me to my end goal of identifying town unfortunately. And in a game where many slots are making a case for why they should be lynched instead of projecting that they are in fact town, it's important to find a distinction. Or at least separate slots that are doing so because they are simply scum from the ones that are doing so intentionally. The latter likely being town.In post 318, Battle Mage wrote:This is a remarkably safe post - if you were short on time, it would probably have been quicker to say what you thought, rather than go to the effort of talking around it. Tet-Hiraki scumpair could work, but would require Orange to be town.
If I go on my scumread, it eliminates a scummy player so I don't think it's too bad. But I'm going to go more hands off rn to let others lead now. I just wanted to let people push on me and let them explain themselves why and then drop it on them that I'm clear so that they stop wasting time if they are town, and can be crossexamined to determine if they were scum pushing it.In post 339, Aloratom wrote:Is there any merit to suggesting that the hider not give out reads? From my way of looking at it, it just narrows down the field for the mafia to target for a double kill.
Unfortunately yes. Is ignorance bliss?In post 337, Hiraki wrote:Are you even reading the game?In post 336, Battle Mage wrote:Not keen on either Orange or Allomancer - does anyone have a good reason for voting for them?
That makes sense.In post 341, DkKoba wrote:If I go on my scumread, it eliminates a scummy player so I don't think it's too bad. But I'm going to go more hands off rn to let others lead now. I just wanted to let people push on me and let them explain themselves why and then drop it on them that I'm clear so that they stop wasting time if they are town, and can be crossexamined to determine if they were scum pushing it.In post 339, Aloratom wrote:Is there any merit to suggesting that the hider not give out reads? From my way of looking at it, it just narrows down the field for the mafia to target for a double kill.
Open setups are open setups, sorry bud but that's a no. Also that 2nd sentence you wrote to me comes off as you just bullshitting and saying a bunch of nothing. What's your point in trying to explain that a clear can have bad reads? Have you been reading the game and concluded that I have not contributed anything positive or meaningful, or are you just scum bullshitting so you can discredit me as a PR?In post 345, Almost50 wrote:@Tet: Quack??
@Looker: I stand corrected. So te only game we had together was Menalque's Favourite Places?
@DkK: Please drop any other site's meta. On MafiaScum even a mod-confirmed Innocent Child doesn't necessarily have good reads (and rightfully so). Note: This does NOT mean I SR Hiraki. I am just saying your guess is as good as any regarding who is whom, and especially so in D1.
did you end up reading?In post 252, Almost50 wrote:I'll read and see if I buy the caseIn post 250, Battle Mage wrote:Not enough people voting for Hiraki here... Would be great if people could explain why, making reference to my watertight case against him!
In post 348, DkKoba wrote:did you end up reading?In post 252, Almost50 wrote:I'll read and see if I buy the caseIn post 250, Battle Mage wrote:Not enough people voting for Hiraki here... Would be great if people could explain why, making reference to my watertight case against him!
Now tell who's not reading (or rather is notIn post 345, Almost50 wrote:Note: This does NOT mean I SR Hiraki.