What does this mean?In post 580, PJ. wrote:Flavor Leaf - normal weird boon stuff. not sure if town or scum but that can wait
I don’t believe we have many matches together, so I’m curious as to what this means to you
What does this mean?In post 580, PJ. wrote:Flavor Leaf - normal weird boon stuff. not sure if town or scum but that can wait
Awkward. I actually forgot you were a hidden Alt, and was already reading you from way early on like it was a given on who you were when I knew that wasn’t the case.In post 595, Cena and Savage wrote:I mean I just told boon my main but I refuse to publically out given how totally unjustifed the toxicity toward me was this game. I won't answer guesses so keep them to yourself thanks
-JC
Ok. Then why does this post exist? Because I assumed you knew who I was too and you feeding the fires here was naglIn post 241, Flavor Leaf wrote:Also, Cena and Savage are hidden identities, but they were using meta earlier on me, weren’t they?
Lol, yeah, I’m with you lot. Down with Cena and Savage!!! (For me in a scum way, though)
It’s fair if you assumed who I was, but why would I assume you knew?In post 602, Cena and Savage wrote:Ok. Then why does this post exist? Because I assumed you knew who I was too and you feeding the fires here was naglIn post 241, Flavor Leaf wrote:Also, Cena and Savage are hidden identities, but they were using meta earlier on me, weren’t they?
Lol, yeah, I’m with you lot. Down with Cena and Savage!!! (For me in a scum way, though)
I've played 4 games with you. You post a lot of nonsense and skate by until some arbitrary point where you turn it on and you do it regardless of alignment. It's not my favorite but its consistent.In post 600, Flavor Leaf wrote:What does this mean?In post 580, PJ. wrote:Flavor Leaf - normal weird boon stuff. not sure if town or scum but that can wait
I don’t believe we have many matches together, so I’m curious as to what this means to you
Ok LavenderIn post 597, Lavender wrote:Well, I am a semi-new player hihi.
A lot of this is flying over me, I don't understand how the vig thing and team works...
Still nothing much from me soz.
Also, are we using the people leaving as an argument?
If anyone is doing that, then they shouldn't be, 'cause that's an angle.In post 597, Lavender wrote:Well, I am a semi-new player hihi.
A lot of this is flying over me, I don't understand how the vig thing and team works...
Still nothing much from me soz.
Also,are we using the people leaving as an argument?
Telling the thread you won't lynch lynchbait that isn't spewing reads is a great way to get absolutely no content from the half of the game doing nothingIn post 609, Ramcius wrote:Hmmmm, 3 person per team is a no go, I'm not sure about rest of you, but I have some conditions on my rolecard that makes some finishers to fail, so I was thinking 4-5 person per team to ensure success of our vigs
Panzer is a bad lynch, no associations, we can't look for people, who pushed/defended him either due to how lynchbaity he is
Policy vig > policy lynch. If we had no way of dealing with Panzer, I would go for lynch, but since we can bury them, I want better lynch, something we can work D2In post 611, Cena and Savage wrote:Telling the thread you won't lynch lynchbait that isn't spewing reads is a great way to get absolutely no content from the half of the game doing nothingIn post 609, Ramcius wrote:Hmmmm, 3 person per team is a no go, I'm not sure about rest of you, but I have some conditions on my rolecard that makes some finishers to fail, so I was thinking 4-5 person per team to ensure success of our vigs
Panzer is a bad lynch, no associations, we can't look for people, who pushed/defended him either due to how lynchbaity he is
-JC
How convenient.In post 609, Ramcius wrote:Hmmmm, 3 person per team is a no go, I'm not sure about rest of you, but I have some conditions on my rolecard that makes some finishers to fail,so I was thinking 4-5 person per team to ensure success of our vigs
Panzer is a bad lynch, no associations, we can't look for people, who pushed/defended him either due to how lynchbaity he is
Why it's convenient?In post 613, Battle Mage wrote:Jesus Christ. I'm not going back through all of that with comments.
How convenient.In post 609, Ramcius wrote:Hmmmm, 3 person per team is a no go, I'm not sure about rest of you, but I have some conditions on my rolecard that makes some finishers to fail,so I was thinking 4-5 person per team to ensure success of our vigs
Panzer is a bad lynch, no associations, we can't look for people, who pushed/defended him either due to how lynchbaity he is
Unvote, Vote: Ramcius
That was still while I was out anyway...In post 404, Battle Mage wrote:You've made 5 posts, saying nothing, and you're badgering Egix for not posting? Daaaaamn, put that cop emoji away!In post 402, Espressojet wrote:Bumping thisIn post 394, Egix96 wrote:
Gonna be out this evening, so if anyone could help get me up to speed with this shizzle that would be great.
Can you elaborate on what important info was given for scum by Cena?In post 616, PJ. wrote:Also, because it got lost in the shuffle, I'd like to bring up that cena claimed Mason w/o partner and used that as part of their excuse for directing basically all of the night actions and giving scum basically all of the information.
Literally every night action.In post 617, Ramcius wrote:Can you elaborate on what important info was given for scum by Cena?In post 616, PJ. wrote:Also, because it got lost in the shuffle, I'd like to bring up that cena claimed Mason w/o partner and used that as part of their excuse for directing basically all of the night actions and giving scum basically all of the information.
Eh? I don't think you've read what Cena wrote, cause I can't even imagine how preliminary plan to use our finishers can be equated to directing every night action, not to mention that people aren't forced to follow it or anything, Cena isn't enforcing it eitherIn post 619, PJ. wrote:Literally every night action.In post 617, Ramcius wrote:Can you elaborate on what important info was given for scum by Cena?In post 616, PJ. wrote:Also, because it got lost in the shuffle, I'd like to bring up that cena claimed Mason w/o partner and used that as part of their excuse for directing basically all of the night actions and giving scum basically all of the information.
And what we can do about it? Nothing, so there's no point in thinking about itIn post 622, gobbledygook wrote:I’m really concerned that people do not understand how powerful the finishers are for scum. It realistically only takes 2-3 of them to get a double nightkill. That’s very powerful.