In post 609, L and Light wrote: In post 591, Enter wrote: In post 397, L and Light wrote: In post 378, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't think i've seen Alisae get so defensive when attacked like that. They seemed to be a bit taken back by Enter's sudden aggressiveness.
~by defensive what exactly do you mean
I know I've seen Ali push back hard and aggressively when they get pushed
also is being defensive AI in your opinion, if you've never seen it before?
-Light
This, for example, is a post that you made only a couple posts before Kerset voted for you where you seem to be defending Ali, but your vote is maintained there.
Yet, when pushed, your excuse is not that you didn't know your vote was there, but instead that you weren't actually playing the game, you were just chilling, you didn't expect anyone to get lynched. When pushed, your response is that the person pushing you is being scummy.
~I am not of the same mind as my partner. As of now, we have not communicated much, and frankly, I had no idea where our vote was, if our vote was anywhere,
None of this was said earlier and now it just seems like an excuse, given that you attacked Kerset before you explained that you were just playing ignorantly and that you're not responsible for your ignorance.
nor did I have any reads at the time of posting that MADE ME want to vote someone.
This is exactly the point Kerset's making. If this statement is true, why didn't you move your vote? I'm aware of your ignorance above, I'm simply explaining why this statement in no way justifies your responses here.
I am not going to "take away" a vote that at the time of me being in thread, I didn't know was there.
See above.
was I ignorant of my hydra's vote? Yes, perhaps I was ignorant.
If you weren't, it was wolfy.
Is it wolfy, or unexpected, that I would NOT change a vote that I am ignorant of? no, and framing it as such in an "opportunistic" mindset is the issue here.
No one is claiming you're being opportunistic for being ignorant. In fact, the argument made against you is that you WEREN'T ignorant, and given the fact that you didn't say anything about not knowing the vote was there until I suggested otherwise, this claim seems a bit faked.
I'm not framing your vote as opportunistic contrary to your ignorance, I'm explaining that it's the only feasible option given the likelihood that you weren't ignorant.
Yes, after the fact of being pushed, and discussing a bit with my hydra partner, I did realize the vote was there, which is why it is not the "ignorant" part that I am pushing back on, but rather the claim of being "opportunistic"
This is excuse for shitty play.
I also was not worried about the vote count, for the reason that I'm not worried about a quick hammer.
This is one reason why this is scummy.
If there was fear of a quick hammer, I would expect there to be some commotion in the thread about people taking off votes and/or SPECIFIC requests to take off votes; and yet, there was nothing.
And still you maintained your vote there with absolutely no read on the person you had your vote on.
So, Ignorant? Perhaps.
I think you think she's saying you're ignorant of your vote. And I think she's saying you're pretending to be ignorant of the fact that the person you have absolutely no read on (and are even defending) is at L-2. If she isn't saying it, I am.
Framing it as opportunistic? no.
-Light
wut