Mini 2127 - Fairly Special [Game Over]

alimdia · Post Post #1125 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:07 pm

Eve should be able to collaborate my partial claim.

pisskop · Post Post #1126 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:10 pm

hahahahaha

youre claiming mailman?

VOTE: eyestott

please, tell me about that message

alimdia · Post Post #1127 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:15 pm

?? I just said it could be another scum mailman or eyescott bs'ing.
Why did u just vote eyescott

What I have to do later is to reread cos I have a good idea of who the mason could be. Then figure out who might be scum cos Egix can't be voted for.

pisskop · Post Post #1128 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:18 pm

it might be a scum mailman . . .

do you think its likely we are dealing with duplicate roles? I mean, we _do_ have _2_ masons. What about a joat with a sampler of several other player abilities?

Titus · Post Post #1129 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 5:47 pm

In post 1128, pisskop wrote:it might be a scum mailman . . .

do you think its likely we are dealing with duplicate roles? I mean, we _do_ have _2_ masons. What about a joat with a sampler of several other player abilities?

So it claims and we go gee this guy has everyone else's role, so we lynch it?

I'm setting aside the mailman and supposing we lynch Egix or EP today. As much as I think Pisskop is scum, that move only makes sense for Pisskop scum if eyestott flips scum first and Pisskop just voted eye.

VOTE: Egix

alimdia · Post Post #1130 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 6:23 pm

Titus, you know we can't lynch Egix right? He got treestumped.

I really can't tell if thats an anti town play or scum play

alimdia · Post Post #1131 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 6:23 pm

In regards to the treestumping

Egix96 · Post Post #1132 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 8:19 pm

In post 1130, alimdia wrote:Titus, you know we can't lynch Egix right? He got treestumped.

I really can't tell if thats an anti town play or scum play

I thought you thought I was scum, so wouldn't it be a pro-town move in your mind?

ISO · Post Post #1133 (ISO) » Mon Apr 20, 2020 9:19 pm

VC 3.2

pisskop (3) - Titus, eyestott, gobbledygook [L-2]

eyestott (1) - pisskop

Not voting: EspressoPatronum, alimdia, Churros, Eve

With 8 alive it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 3 will end in (expired on 2020-04-29 17:00:00) or when a lynch is reached.

Churros is V/LA until April 21st.

Egix is not a valid vote because Egix96 is chilled.

Eve · Post Post #1134 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:10 am

yeah i confirm i got that message from alim last night

eyestott is doing a mad bussing play or is town being bamboozled

either way

VOTE: pisskop

eyestott · Post Post #1135 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:20 am

In post 1068, EspressoPatronum wrote:I support a full claim today.

If we're actually in mylo, I'd prefer if the JOAT confirmed eyestott's story.

The JOAT informed me that they will not be claiming today. They aren't done with their abilities.

In post 1069, EspressoPatronum wrote:On another note, I'd also like to discuss the merits of eyestott fullclaiming everyone's flavour. Everyone could then confirm/deny that is their flavour. I'm struggling to see the point in the nightly flavour reveals, so maybe there's more than eyestott is letting on.

@gobble - who did you target last night?

I'm just a glorified VT, just like Mastina, and whoever this flavour investigator is. Though I'm not comfortable handing IC status to whoever claims that role, even if it means forsaking my earlier argument that mafia couldn't have a purely flavour role.

In post 1102, Egix96 wrote:
In post 1040, eyestott wrote:
Last night I received a letter in the mail.
The message didn’t reveal who sent it, but they said that they’re
a JOAT (who) investigated PK night 1
and got guilty.
I have reason to believe these parts are true.

I am Confucian

In post 1113, EspressoPatronum wrote:Intent to vote pisskop. Not sure if it's at L-2 or L-1 now so imma hold off on actually voting.

We should definitely do claims tomorrow if we don't do them today.

Fully support D4 massclaims. Not today please.

In post 1118, Eve wrote:yo eyestott you need to tell us more about this message

The less I say, the better chance I have of not giving the JOATs identity away.

In post 1124, alimdia wrote:I'm gonna do a partial claim, and redact some stuff because I don't want to give other info away 'freely'

I am an mailman. I sent a mail to Eve last night. The contents of the mail shall remain secret for now, but it definitely is NOT 'I'm a JOAT and I got a guilty on pisskop N1', so that rules out me being redirected to eyescott.
I did not send a mail to anyone else last night. Therefore, I'm struggling to understand how eyescott got a mail last night.
I also did not send mail on N1, Eve should understand why.

The conclusion is that the mailman is either scum or eyescott is just bs'ing the whole thing up.

Huh, weird.
I don't have a good response to that, but I maintain that everything I said is true. I can't say with 100% certainty that anything in the message was true, but I definitely received mail.

pisskop · Post Post #1136 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:26 am

In post 1135, eyestott wrote:The JOAT informed me that they will not be claiming today. They aren't done with their abilities.

yea, and you decided to not share this before because you wanted to see us squirm

pisskop · Post Post #1137 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:26 am

theirs bs and then theres this.

eyestott · Post Post #1138 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:34 am

In post 1137, pisskop wrote:theirs bs and then theres this.

Wow PK, try some empathy

eyestott · Post Post #1139 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:35 am

In post 1015, pisskop wrote:Im sorry guys, Im having job issues and stuff

In post 1016, eyestott wrote:Don’t feel bad.
I spent most of every day since Wednesday a week and a bit ago, preparing to run a Pathfinder Campaign which started tonight. (And got so much interest from friends I have a second group starting the same campaign tomorrow night), so everyone has busy times. Let’s all 3 try to be more active during D3, eh?

You of all people shouldn’t be putting flak on people for being inactive

Eve · Post Post #1140 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:36 am

pisskop why does he need to invent this when you were the easy lynch from yesterday anyway

pisskop · Post Post #1141 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:38 am

I dont believed I ever questioned your activity? why is that your retort to me claiming your fabricating this

pisskop · Post Post #1142 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:38 am

Eve, what happens when i i flip green and some townie gets stumped tomorrow?

eyestott · Post Post #1143 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 1:50 am

In post 1136, pisskop wrote:
In post 1135, eyestott wrote:The JOAT informed me that they will not be claiming today. They aren't done with their abilities.
yea, and you decided to not share this before because you wanted to see us squirm

Oh I thought that’s what you were trying to say with this, saying that my recent inactivity was a calculated decision to sow discord.
My bad

gobbledygook · Post Post #1144 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:04 am

I just find it extremely odd the mailman didn’t target me because it would duplicate their mail, if they were afraid of dying or wanted someone to actually get the mail.

This game is really weird, but I am going to trust the guilty.

pisskop · Post Post #1145 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:08 am

wait, so you acknowledge that there's something wrong here, and youre just going to continue down this path?

pisskop · Post Post #1146 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:09 am

Goobles, why wouldnt i kill you as scum, since you always seem to SR me?

Bingle i have quite a history with, i could in theory work him.

gobbledygook · Post Post #1147 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:12 am

Oh I fully know someone is lying here. I just don’t know who. With your flip, it could help me sort other people.

gobbledygook · Post Post #1148 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:13 am

Like the fact that 0 people have used my ability to help solve this game is both mind blowing and super annoying.

pisskop · Post Post #1149 (ISO) » Tue Apr 21, 2020 2:13 am

Jesus gobbles, im not scum for being apathetic.