| Target | Wagon |
|---|---|
nomnomnom (4) | GuiltyLion (1076), The Limit Does Not Exist (1116), Eve (1189), nomnomnom (1203) |
Karnage (1) | Allomancer (850) |
Not Voting (6) | BBmolla (786), Karnage (1028), Auro (1041), SausasaurusRex (1157), acryon (1163), skitter30 (1192) |
Take any random page, and cite the useless posts in there for me. ThanksIn post 1226, nomnomnom wrote:pointless posts. There's so many useless posts in this game.
If allo flips town I'll think about this game in the night and reread the thread, that's what I always do. That's also how I caught Titus in the game we played together: we lynched a slot, we had a flip, I reread the game, I thought to myself Titus was the best cop shot, and she was scum. I do this every game.In post 1228, Auro wrote:So how were you advancing your own reads on slots apart from Allo/Eve?
Ok; I asked this once and got ignored, but I'll ask again: Say Allo flips town. This is a progression by your standards. Now who does this point to?
Can you cite posts from the "confused" game implying your confusion stemmed from a lack of ability to read the game, rather than people behaving weirdly?
I don't see how the two are incompatible?In post 1229, acryon wrote:How is it that you can be so confused (which means your reads are weak this game) while simultaneously knowing enough to decide which posts are "useless" and "pointless"?
This is just how I play. , please re-summarize. I can certainly appreciate that, but because you can die any night you need to be able to play the short- and long-game. You can't forsake the former for the latter.In post 1233, nomnomnom wrote:Do you know why I skim through big portion of posts and single tidbits of discussions? Because the micro portion of mafia is not how you catch scum. It's the macro portion of mafia, the bigger picture, analyzing the gamestate. The micro portion only becomes helpful when you specifically look for things like interaction when you have a few flips to work with. That's why I do it. I like how I do things, but apparently a lot of people don't
Well, I've already said it before: in this gamestate, the scums are either lurking away until my lynch happens, or profiting from this confusion to scumread me. I haven't had a lot of defending, so from a logical perspective, scum *should* be in lurkers or the ones that are pushing my lynch, which leads to eve, allo, karnage and skitt. I still am not sure about Karnage at all but from a macro perspective right now he totally could be scum and I could settle for a lynch there, certainly. I think Eve is totally in her scumrange from what I read in Skyrim, so that's why I did a radical 180.In post 1235, Auro wrote:So do you have any macro-comments on the gamestate leading up to the wagon on you?
If you've already stated before, sorry, I skimmed them
Actually to your point, I'm now remembering that I questioned Eve on this and she just straight-up never responded...In post 1238, nomnomnom wrote:VOTE: Eve
This is what I propose as a wagon. I think from a read progression and macro standpoint she's the sketchiest in the mix I posted.
Well I can't trust you right now, but if we get more of you tomorrow and you're town, I think the town is better off.In post 1244, nomnomnom wrote:Then again if you're doubting on Eve, I have the other slots I mentioned as compromise. We don't have all day.
If you seriously can't trust me, then I guess my lynch is inevitable. Maybe my guidance will be helpful then if my word can be trusted.
