Large Normal 228: Bananas - Game Over

[gobbledygook]

VC 1.7

Fenraiser (1) - Black Ranger
osuka
NorwegianBoyEE
ManateeDude
Black Ranger (1) - CantLynchAPuppy
bob3141 (1) - osuka
Wake88
fwogcarf (4) - Nahdia, bob3141, SirCakez, Umlaut
Umlaut (1) - Drew-Sta
Titus
Drew-Sta
CantLynchAPuppy
SirCakez (2) - NorwegianBoyEE, ManateeDude
Nahdia (1) - Fwogcarf

Not Voting

(3) - Fenraiser, Wake88, Titus

With 14 alive, it takes 8 to remove someone from the town.

Deadline

: (expired on 2020-06-09 12:00:00)
[/color]

[Wake1]

What's the argument for lynching fwogcarf in a nutshell?

[Titus]

What's the argument for lynching fwogcarf in a nutshell?

Their scumread on Nahdia isn't legit. That's the case anyway. I'm not saying whether or not I agree with it yet.

[osuka]

ugh hold on i have to read a lot of shit but ill try my best to catch up properly and not miss anything important

all while actively avoiding having an aneurysm because of some of the dumb shit i bet i have to read in this thread

[osuka]

Does scum theater this early

why, are you scumreading them both?

This pop-in seems scummy because Nahdia doesn't address Bob/Osuka much but takes this opportunity to pressure Fwog.

Nahdia's pretty carefree especially regarding Bob/Osuka too and it shows in their previous posts:

fascinating stuff

yup

im just enjoying the view, friend bob.

So I while I believe Nahdia could have glazed over Bob/Osuka I think they should have been able to form an opinion regarding Bob/Osuka tbh at that time at least. Just weird how Fwog became the focus instead of one of those two even considering that Nahdia might have glazed over the argument. Nahdia seemed like a wolf pouncing on prey that dared to wander out into the chaos of Bob/Osuka.

On another note:

Spoiler:

More votes on osuka, please and thank you friends.

Also dang mod, that 4xBump Combo. Never in all my years have I seen such a daring maneuver.

This irks me because it has never been explained and I can't see a thought process.

good post

[osuka]

@drew na what i meant was that it was intended to try and sort lucky.

Ok. Thank you for clearing that up.

@Drew

Then why did you contribute to it?

You're effectively rewriting how something is to be read, and I don't believe that comes from a town place.

Could you walk me through this because I'm confused tbh. I don't get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regarding Lucky:

Lucky's attitude in post 199 resonates with me. Townhunting is also a valid way to scumhunt lol. But the explanation is so......long and could have been more concise imo. Emotion seems genuine here especially regarding Titus and he seems earnest because he's overdefending himself but he may be

too earnest

so I don't want to townread him so easily. Haven't seen the townhunting yet so not a good

luck

look overall.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

@Drew

Spoiler:

I've basically skimmed most of the game and it was hard for me to pick up anything. Guess it's all the new dudes i haven't played with, a lot of their words just sound like noise.

I noticed some people scumreading Black Ranger, why?
As for wagon on

Fenraiser

fwog. Most questionable thing i can find is his post 98. What do you mean? Who is the scum doing a "theater"?

Fixed that for you.

Re your request for a walk through.

Person A proposes we do something.
Person B engages with it.
Person C identifies what was being done was stupid and not meritorious for town.
Person B agrees with Person C, and suggests what Person A was doing was problematic.
Person D asks why they engaged with it, if that's how they felt.
Person B redefines how something should be interpreted, rather than allowing how it played out in the game to be the way it should be interprted.

That is rewriting how something should be interpreted. Which, IMHO, is not townbased behaviour.

Also,t he @Drew spoiler thing - what did you mean by that?

Re Lucky, I'm not debating whether town hunting is as valid as scum hunting. I'm arguing their desire to explain themselves seemed very anxious, which made me consider it unusual.

this is a bit weird and rubs me off the wrong way.

keeping in mind the fact that his point is that person B "redefined how something should be interpreted" (whatever that means), here's how the walkthrough went:

1. show some facts
2. show some interpretation of the facts
3. show the point he's trying to prove in the same format as he's been showing facts (!)
4. reiterate his point while pretending the above proves it (!!)

[osuka]

Listed and bolded what I wish to discuss:

a. I feel like you're stretching there. I agree it looked odd, but the intent seemed to be to get engagement with the game by making people post glib shit. I don't think you're misrepresenting of them but I don't agree with your assessment.
b. This pings me. Seems like you made a fuss, then got caught out, and back tracked in your behaviour.

If you're not going to ask me any questions then you're talking for an audience and should follow it up with a vote.

strikes me as odd but I can't really put a finger on why

[osuka]

Not saying I'm a PR this time around, but I learned from my last game not to share results until someone declared intent to hammer.

what the fuck

this feels as if all the dimensions my brain exists in have collapsed into one and created a singularity that is deeply, deeply confused

[osuka]

if you honestly think town wouldn't skim over a page full of angsty wallposts at the very start of the game, idk what to tell you. that's just straight up wrong.

the angsty wallposts were mostly really short actually, and at that point were the single most significant interaction chain in the game. it is, at the very least, negligent of you not to read them, assuming youre town

[osuka]

if you honestly think town wouldn't skim over a page full of angsty wallposts at the very start of the game, idk what to tell you. that's just straight up wrong.

>Asks me question about scumreading Bob/Osuka
>Doesn't know anything about the interaction

Thonk

[osuka]

What's the argument for lynching fwogcarf in a nutshell?

Their scumread on Nahdia isn't legit. That's the case anyway. I'm not saying whether or not I agree with it yet.

can you back this up?

[Titus]

What's the argument for lynching fwogcarf in a nutshell?

Their scumread on Nahdia isn't legit. That's the case anyway. I'm not saying whether or not I agree with it yet.

can you back this up?

Yes, I could but it's already discussed in some of the posts you quoted.

[osuka]

What's the argument for lynching fwogcarf in a nutshell?

Their scumread on Nahdia isn't legit. That's the case anyway. I'm not saying whether or not I agree with it yet.

can you back this up?

Yes, I could but it's already discussed in some of the posts you quoted.

excuse me posts that

I

quoted?

[osuka]

i do vaguely remember that being discussed but i dont think it came from you initially. Do you have a post number (or page) just to spare me some time here?

[SirCakez]

Starting to think osuka maybe town

[Titus]

i do vaguely remember that being discussed but i dont think it came from you initially. Do you have a post number (or page) just to spare me some time here?

321 for starters. I am not redoing through the thread. Someone asked my opinion. I answered. I regret it already.

[fwogcarf]

Not saying I'm a PR this time around, but I learned from my last game not to share results until someone declared intent to hammer.

what the fuck

this feels as if all the dimensions my brain exists in have collapsed into one and created a singularity that is deeply, deeply confused

My brain cannot comprehend the excessive amount of effort put into this post

[Drew-Sta]

Prodge. Will reread tomorrow. I've currently had a cracking week at work.

[Fenraiser]

Hmm is CantLynchAPuppy town or is puppy just really cute?

why ask this question

I would lean town just from post tone but avi+name and being a puppy might have influenced the lean subconciously so I am a bit cautious.

On another note,

VOTE: Bob

[NorwegianboyEE]

I’m not really seeing that many convincing arguments yet and that’s probably why i can’t pay much attention to all that’s going on. I’m keeping my vote on Cakez and suggest we lynch there. But all in all i’d jusy like to end day 1 so discussion maybe will have more meaning to me.

[Umlaut]

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

[NorwegianboyEE]

VOTE: NorwegianboyEE

[Umlaut]

I’m not really seeing that many convincing arguments yet and that’s probably why i can’t pay much attention to all that’s going on. I’m keeping my vote on Cakez and suggest we lynch there. But all in all i’d jusy like to end day 1 so discussion maybe will have more meaning to me.

You can be unconvinced and wanting to see better arguments, or you can be looking to end the day, but you can't be both. That's not a town mindset at all.

[NorwegianboyEE]

That doesn't make sense. Are you just making out the ever present "town mindset" to be whatever you want it to be?

[gobbledygook]

-