YES! A baby flying fox!!!!In post 331, Starbuck wrote:Morning Tweet! Is that a bat in your avatar? Because OMG.
lol you're thinking of this one, although i wouldn't go so far as to call it solveyIn post 293, Auro wrote:Wait wtf, what's my memory coming to - maybe I mixed up games, but I thought this was the one where she replaced in and made a massive solvey catchup as scum. Lemme have a look againIn post 288, Albert B. Rampage wrote:But she was town in partition...
the attempt to solve the game day 1 with associations is a good sign imo.In post 473, Morning Tweet wrote:Llama - It's weird to me that Llama plays like he has only a day to live -- However, seems like a strategy that would fail in the long term for scum. there's other stuff i like but that's one thing i wanted to note
I'm glad you see this, too!In post 461, Hoopla wrote:green crayons stock is plummeting! sell! sell! sell!
saw this post because of MT's 473. do you really think that vpb is playing a scumgame here? i dont want to get too meta-ready but he seems a little more unfiltered than he did in our last normal, at least enough to outweigh anything like early day 1 weak associativesIn post 333, Blair wrote:It's early to partner hunt him, but if I had to, I would expect at least one on-wagon early bus and at least one off-wagon detractor.In post 330, Llamarble wrote:Blair who are IAAU's buddies? Who definitely isn't IAAU's buddies?
On-wagon: Could be VP Baltar. He felt the need to over explain why he was sheeping me. Could denote self consciousness.
Off-wagon: Porkens or Llamarble. Porkens took a direct stab at the wagon based on IIAU's post count. Llamarble indirectly did the same by bringing it up under the guise of helpfully describing the wagon.
This feels disingenuous when I think more about it:In post 471, farside22 wrote:Like I've seen waiting more but again this was him within a hydra.
I'm doing a terrible job this game, and I've recently realized that I've completely forgotten how to scum hunt (I think I knew back in like 2017ish but it's gone now - if anyone can recommend some reading I'd appreciate it)In post 482, CantHateAPuppy wrote:saw this post because of MT's 473. do you really think that vpb is playing a scumgame here? i dont want to get too meta-ready but he seems a little more unfiltered than he did in our last normal, at least enough to outweigh anything like early day 1 weak associativesIn post 333, Blair wrote:It's early to partner hunt him, but if I had to, I would expect at least one on-wagon early bus and at least one off-wagon detractor.In post 330, Llamarble wrote:Blair who are IAAU's buddies? Who definitely isn't IAAU's buddies?
On-wagon: Could be VP Baltar. He felt the need to over explain why he was sheeping me. Could denote self consciousness.
Off-wagon: Porkens or Llamarble. Porkens took a direct stab at the wagon based on IIAU's post count. Llamarble indirectly did the same by bringing it up under the guise of helpfully describing the wagon.
Black sheep...why are you voting me?In post 479, Auro wrote:Baa, baa.
I'm so glad that I'm not the only one.In post 466, AGar wrote:Because directly after a post from Starbuck asking to explain the IAAUN wagon, you dropped the Porkens quote devoid of any context. How Starbuck read it is how I read it, as well. It really wasn't hard to get to that point. Not sure how this is something you can't fathom.
Well your post is different. The only reference I have playing with you was when you were in a hydra and I would say you were less spammy in the hydra then you are here. I remember Animal Upick was goofy for a bit but that was the majority being goofy. When Double Day happened that went pretty quickly less goofy. So I typically see you going where the game goes instead of like this.In post 483, Auro wrote:This feels disingenuous when I think more about it:In post 471, farside22 wrote:Like I've seen waiting more but again this was him within a hydra.
You tried to claim or at least implied that that's a good representative of my play and thus different from here. I pointed out that I lurked and didn't do much (I did have my votes consistently on scum, but lalala hindsight).
Your reaction then was to continue to double down on that argument by then treating that game as somewhat similar to my play here but dismissing it as "him within a hydra".
It feels like instead of actually discerning what could cause a change in my style, you're tunneling on the *didn't achieve expectations* argument anyway.
yeah i'm thinking it's a "u had to have been there" momentIn post 484, Porkens wrote:This post is scummy to me because it's coaxing suspicion if that makes any sense.
There, there.In post 484, Porkens wrote:I'm doing a terrible job this game, and I've recently realized that I've completely forgotten how to scum hunt (I think I knew back in like 2017ish but it's gone now - if anyone can recommend some reading I'd appreciate it)
I get that it's easy to miss; he's playing fairly well in terms of not dropping obvious-scumbag-moments.In post 489, Starbuck wrote:What am I missing when it comes to Auro?
does that qualify?
This was to farside, although it does amusingly also fit as a response to Le Marlboro's last post.In post 497, Auro wrote:does that qualify?
Then please vote it; I'd say CLAP is a fine and acceptable vote anyhow.In post 484, Porkens wrote: This post is scummy to me because it's coaxing suspicion if that makes any sense.
