well its not really non infected ig, its if i target someone and they aren't cured as a result of it, i turn into a neutral survivorIn post 8622, Auro wrote:What happens if you had targeted non infected? Who'd you target?In post 8621, OkaPoka wrote:im a mad scientist turned failed mad scientist
If you wanted to scumside, and you believed Maxwell's claim was definitely scum, why pop up just to push that?In post 8621, OkaPoka wrote:im a mad scientist turned failed mad scientist
So we know who's infected?In post 8625, OkaPoka wrote:who cares who i targetted, that's private info
Naw. Pretty sure you should out that.In post 8625, OkaPoka wrote:who cares who i targetted, that's private info
He's been acting like this for literally the entire game, though. He can't have been infected on day 1. In fact it looks like someone using a troll persona as cover to avoid being voted. We've already got 5 claimed/suspected infected and I cant see him fitting in there anywhere.In post 8559, Nero Cain wrote:his posts. He'd trolling and trying to get lynched today. I mean, you could interpret it as group scum thats pretending to be infected but then I don't really feel like he was scum so to me he makes sense as an infected.
It just says I can study it, it doesnt say if that actually does anything. I assume it just means I get to choose what side I'm playing on. If it were me, I would've just stayed on the infected side because they're clearly doing better but FL didn't want to for whatever reason.In post 8591, Auro wrote:You guys missed something very important.In post 8520, maxwell wrote:The PM says I have the option to remain infected and study the infection, so it's not like it's a compulsory thing.
@maxwell: so you're saying you learn something about the infection every night you have it, or so? Did you learn anything for the period you were infected in?
You're basically totally ignoring the emphasis so many people had about lynching Gobble? Or no?In post 8638, maxwell wrote:He's been acting like this for literally the entire game, though. He can't have been infected on day 1. In fact it looks like someone using a troll persona as cover to avoid being voted. We've already got 5 claimed/suspected infected and I cant see him fitting in there anywhere.In post 8559, Nero Cain wrote:his posts. He'd trolling and trying to get lynched today. I mean, you could interpret it as group scum thats pretending to be infected but then I don't really feel like he was scum so to me he makes sense as an infected.
I'm still reading, trying to catch up, but while I'm doing that, here's a working theory for everyone: This game looks like it's been an absolute slog. A ton of replacements, generally unmotivated players, and no scum lynched. It's clear that town is on the backfoot and mafia are in a very strong position. In this type of situation, the players most likely to stay committed and stay motivated are the ones with a scum win condition, because they're winning and we're losing. So the slots that haven't been replaced at all are the ones that need to be looked at the closest.
I am still not up to speed. From what I gather he fakeclaimed a PR and quickhammered day 5, and that's why people are on him? Still, unless there's a plausible alternative for someone other than (pisskop, davesaz, maxwell, clidd, gobble) having been infected, it seems like incorrect play to go after him rather than hunting group scum. It would be really helpful if someone could give me a summary but no one seems to want to do so so far.In post 8640, LicketyQuickety wrote:You're basically totally ignoring the emphasis so many people had about lynching Gobble? Or no?
FL replaced out because I called him ObvScum and when I said that, he referred to his meta. Earlier, he said meta sucks for reading people. Also, his claim makes zero sense whatsoever.
I did not say that? If anything its likely the pile-on here is scum-driven given voting out infected is basically free and protects the core mafia group.In post 8642, LicketyQuickety wrote:Now Maxwell doesn't seem to think there is any Scum on Gobble. Such and obvious Scum slot should have been lynched on D5.
What it comes down to for me is that we pretty much know gobbles is scum by now. He may be claiming and acting Infected, but Alchemist crumbed a cure target on him last night, and yet gobbles is still scum. So either he IS group scum, or something interfered with the cure.In post 8641, maxwell wrote:I am still not up to speed. From what I gather he fakeclaimed a PR and quickhammered day 5, and that's why people are on him? Still, unless there's a plausible alternative for someone other than (pisskop, davesaz, maxwell, clidd, gobble) having been infected, it seems like incorrect play to go after him rather than hunting group scum. It would be really helpful if someone could give me a summary but no one seems to want to do so so far.In post 8640, LicketyQuickety wrote:You're basically totally ignoring the emphasis so many people had about lynching Gobble? Or no?
Why do you think Gobble is PGO?In post 8450, Radical Rat wrote:Okay, somehow I completely missed that post. And that was toDay so... Guess I was wrong.
It looked to me like Alchemist was crumbing gobbles as his target, and yesterDay gobbles mentioned having a PGO shot as part of the JoAT claim. So when Alchemist died, AND we got a new infection, I immediately assumed that meant instead of that death being scum's NK, it was gobbles' PGO being triggered.
But yeah, claiming "not not scum" kind of shuts that theory down, so...
VOTE: gobbledygook
Wut? Do you like, have to ask your parents permission before you vote to make sure it's okay or what?In post 8647, OkaPoka wrote:intent to vote gobbles
