with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2020-07-07 13:00:00)
Last edited by Datisi on Thu Jun 25, 2020 8:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 798, Deimos27 wrote:That isn't intrinsically illogical. It depends on the 3 players, and the reasoning for why they are being suspected.
It's illogical because the default strategy for scum is one-on one-off.
If you switch 3 suspicious people on-coalition for 3 off-coalition people, even if you are right about one of those three people you switched off - you end up with their scumbuddy instead and end up in the hot seat when the coalition fails
"I hope one day I can openly play as wolfy as Pooky and get zero pressure for it grumble grumble."
-MariaR
"I can't even look at the game anymore.
That evil teddy bear has got everyone twirling by his thumb.
It's like witnessing an slow but unavoidable train crash you can't stop."
In post 797, Clover Ebi wrote:What I didn't understand is why Votato was trying to cut me off about discussing day 2. That just didn't make sense to me. Why do you think it's more likely I'm scum in that case than town?
How do you still not understand why he was cutting you off about discussing D2? He was quite clear that he thinks this is because it benefits scum. There was nothing confusing here, yet you reacted with confusion.
The emotional reaction and supposed ignorance about scum strategy is LAMIST and therefore scummy.
But I don't want to talk about this anymore because it isn't
that
strong a te and I'd rather you focus on making reads and playing the game so I can sort you more accurately.
In post 798, Deimos27 wrote:That isn't intrinsically illogical. It depends on the 3 players, and the reasoning for why they are being suspected.
It's illogical because the default strategy for scum is one-on one-off.
If you switch 3 suspicious people on-coalition for 3 off-coalition people, even if you are right about one of those three people you switched off - you end up with their scumbuddy instead and end up in the hot seat when the coalition fails
Ok you're actually right I missed the fact that replacing three mathematical guarantees including the second scum, if there was only one originally.
Your reaction comes from town most often after someone uses really bad logic. Votato's logic was straightforward, so townie reactions should reflect that. You could've said "sorry, I just didn't understand why it's good for scum to talk about D2. Is there an explanation you can give for why that's the case while circumventing this obstacle?"
In post 87, votato wrote:we arent gonna discuss day 2 because it could help scum to discuss it now.
How so?
explaining that would help scum. you trying to bait me into explaining it makes me think you're scum.
In post 110, votato wrote:yes. talking about scum's optimal strategy only helps scum at this stage. insisting that we discuss scum's optimal strategy and in fact trying to goad me into explaining what i think that strategy is, is scummy.
and how that is scummy. I, was left confused by this because as I said in a post after: That wasn't what I was talking about at all because no where in my post did I even mention talking about what scum are going to do. You will notice that any confusion I had over the conversation was gone when he was being clear in this post:
In post 111, votato wrote:once we get to day 2 we should discuss day 2. until then i think its counterproductive. imho.
I wanted to talk about day 2 and how us as a town could go forward. Yet Votato made vague posts saying that it could help scum which left me visibility confused on why talking about what we as a town want to do only helps scum. When I ask for more clarity on my clear confusion he calls me scummy for it.
Ok, no, votato's topic was always "talking about D2". It turns into "talking about scum's optimal strategy" because that is (obviously) why he thinks talking about D2 is pro-scum. Because it informs their strategy for D1.
In post 820, Deimos27 wrote:I assume your coalition is your townreads. Do you have an idea of who you think scum is?
I haven't been really looking for scum so I can't really say I have anyone listed as scum but I would probably lynch Alduskkel for not having many reasons to townread them and Pooky for information.
In post 404, DkKoba wrote:I don't wish to flood the game so i will be stepping away now to give time to react to what I posted by the players I want to get a better analysis on ~~ but I will be around to answer questions.
saying this and then actually flooding the game anyway is kind of town
In post 451, Alduskkel wrote:honestly surprised that anyone in this game is townreading me at this point because i've barely done anything this game yet
In post 453, Alduskkel wrote:datisi too cowardly to post a vote count because i snagged the page top
also this sounds weird but deimos's scumread on me feels like it makes more sense than tux's townread on me