I mean you can lynch me if you want. My alignment is random per set up but im town so you know what i think and i stopped caring about this game since i went back to work. And lack of info.
Im just going on if the player is alien and look at imteractions from there.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
So if its alien the id say tse based bingle interaction. bingle never wanted to vote titus nor did he vote tse.
Not really a fan of either tse or cl gameplay and wouldn't be surprised if they were both some type of scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
[There was someone on the mafia that handed out red, yellow, and blue cards. They're not alignment related. Also that person is dead now so those cards are outdated anyway.]
Early on in the game there was a push against Chateau. An alien was on his wagon, however, there was also an alien voting for another alien here too. Could be an early distancing play. Titus' vote on Chateau was also a naked vote (Although she was dealing with depression at the time).
Here's her comment on CL prior:
In post 663, Titus wrote:If Chateau keeps his vote on Quick or does not additional hunting, I might vote there but MD wants it.
Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.
Two Girls only seems to be here when pressured. I don't find anything they say memorable.
The people defending Two Girls I have as suspects for being a third party or scum themselves.
I townread the people pushing Two Girls.
Okay, that doesn't mean Two Girls is actually Scum though. Guilty by assaociation? You can do better than that.
The first two comments are not "guilt by association". Being present only when pressured and lacking memorable content are not associative indicators.
I am willing to take a backseat when a) I don't have the energy to drive, b) the wagons I want most are vetoed and c) the lynch being pushed isn't bad.
Just don't claim things that aren't true about my play and say I can do better.
In post 1423, Ircher wrote:Main thing would be the way Bingle's pushing the card claiming. It's not a great strategy; it's a huge waste of space, time, and effort; and it gives him a way to look busy without actually doing much. His primary scumread is on me because Bingle subscribes to the theory that anyone who thinks Bingle's ideas with regards to the cards is wrong is scum trying to keep town from abusing it when in reality, it's not really abusable at all, and most of the effects directly benefit scum anyway.
Okay. I think I'm grasping your train of thought. How is this very different from your D1 claim that we should share our page numbers?
And what exactly does "abusable by town" mean?
Oh now I get the SRs on ircher. I guess IRcher's bracket ranking things are also "gives him a way to look busy without actually doing much."
And no, I haven't done much this game either so maybe I shouldn't judge ircher on this but it feels like it (again) "gives him a way to [SR Bingle] without actually doing much.
Ircher seems defeated. Not much else I can say. town!ircher wouldn't be so resigned imo but I don't have much experience there but I am just comparing with early game Ircher vs. ircher now.
I'm not a big fan on this pivot. Ircher self votes and the day ends.
TSE of course still wants Titus. Farside HEAVILY suspects Titus now, because she keeps using her loverize in weird ways instead of loverizing two scum together. I was defending Titus, b-but.. I was just being completely fooled by her bday page Townie explanation. Let's see what Chateau was saying around this time:
In post 2006, Chateau Lobby wrote:If scum is on the hellbrooks wagon it has to be within the last few slots to vote there once the lynch became inevitable. Titus was position way too early on that wagon imo to be scum.
Morning Tweet, Porkens, ManateeDude. Thats the hellbrooks L-2, L-1- and hammer.
Hellbrooks was parked on porkens which also sets off a red flag.
Why aren't we lynching porkens instead?
Maybe we can convince titus to loverize herself with someone to kinda "leash" her?
VOTE: Porkens
In post 2024, Chateau Lobby wrote:Is everyone just blindly trusting the word of a the dead scum? How do we even know aliens exists in this game?
In post 2026, Porkens wrote:Also chateau is clear hard-defending his partner and (I’m assuming) fellow alien
In post 2028, Chateau Lobby wrote:then how do you explain all the people CONFIRMING being loverized?
I voted Chateau all the way to E-2 but unvoted a little before this post.
Hm. So the two aliens are pushing for the Looker/Pork combo to get sliced. Farside wants Chateau. TSE still wants to rid the world of Titus. Chateau agrees that we should chop the Porken/Looker combo.
Ah, and NOW the lynch goes through since it pivoted to third party, with farside, Morning, and Titus voting Manatee off. Chateau has dodged so many lynches this game, it's almost like he has a band of one or two people unwilling to vote for him.
[There are many reasons to suspect Chateau of being an alien. Both TSE and farside have shown heavy suspicion towards Titus, with TSE showing the most. It seems to me that the aliens both tend to stray away from voting Chateau, and Chateau strays away from voting the aliens.]
[There is but a single exception to this rule in all the votecounts I analyzed. Titus voted Chateau D2, but swapped off to 2G1V and gave a bunch of justification.]
[I would say if there is just an alien left among us, it would most likely be Chateau.]
[Farside proclaimed Titus makes no sense as town on D5. On prior days she gut townread Titus. I suppose it could be a bus since she would have still had Bingle alive with her. She did end up voting for CL/Manatee instead of Titus, but she still scumread Titus.]
[There is some ability that was inhibiting the werewolves and mafia from killing, obviously. Chateau's doctor claim, if he healed perfectly every night, technically could explain every no death, except for night four where two kills failed.]
[Will look and see if there's an alien role that can stop deaths, perhaps. Interesting that Chateau healed almost only aliens, although if he were an alien, I don't know why he'd admit that. And why'd the heal on Bingle fail?]
[There is some ability that was inhibiting the werewolves and mafia from killing, obviously. Chateau's doctor claim, if he healed perfectly every night, technically could explain every no death, except for night four where two kills failed.]
[Will look and see if there's an alien role that can stop deaths, perhaps. Interesting that Chateau healed almost only aliens, although if he were an alien, I don't know why he'd admit that. And why'd the heal on Bingle fail?]
Could the effort saver role be the reason behind no one dying on N1?
[There is some ability that was inhibiting the werewolves and mafia from killing, obviously. Chateau's doctor claim, if he healed perfectly every night, technically could explain every no death, except for night four where two kills failed.]
[Will look and see if there's an alien role that can stop deaths, perhaps. Interesting that Chateau healed almost only aliens, although if he were an alien, I don't know why he'd admit that. And why'd the heal on Bingle fail?]
Could the effort saver role be the reason behind no one dying on N1?
[Yep, that's what i was getting at for N1]
[I can believe that the groupscum tried to get rid of Titus. Her ability was quite powerful. Night four still sticks out, I can believe a BM kills, but both teams gunning for BM at once? What are the odds?]
[I think the aliens attacked N5, and used Titus' loverization to kill both Star and Battle Mage.]
[The other nights, well, it's technically possible you blocked almost every kill. Technically.]
[I checked Grand Idea, by the way, there are quite a few alien doctors. Still, if you are an alien doctor, it's kind of odd you'd admit to healing almost exclusively aliens.]