i am trying to read you????Bell wrote:I’m trying to figure out what datisi is doing,
like you're accusing me of being reachy, when i tell you to own up to it and point out WHERE, you're like "why?"
the fuck am i supposed to think
i am trying to read you????Bell wrote:I’m trying to figure out what datisi is doing,
I know you’re being reachy. I’m not accusing you of it.In post 325, Datisi wrote:i am trying to read you????Bell wrote:I’m trying to figure out what datisi is doing,
like you're accusing me of being reachy, when i tell you to own up to it and point out WHERE, you're like "why?"
the fuck am i supposed to think
Tbh, kinda.In post 328, Datisi wrote:do you think that i am being reachy in a scummy manner?
i really think ur reaching here, bellIn post 331, Bell wrote:Based on our interactions.
You asked me to point out where you were lying, then asked me to point out where you were reaching and then asked me to point out how reaching made you mafia.
![]()
See your initial vote and explanation for reachiness.
Okay, who do you think is mafia?In post 332, Iconeum wrote:i really think ur reaching here, bellIn post 331, Bell wrote:Based on our interactions.
You asked me to point out where you were lying, then asked me to point out where you were reaching and then asked me to point out how reaching made you mafia.
![]()
See your initial vote and explanation for reachiness.
except no?In post 331, Bell wrote:Based on our interactions.
You asked me to point out where you were lying, then asked me to point out where you were reaching and then asked me to point out how reaching made you mafia.
![]()
See your initial vote and explanation for reachiness.
i'm still very much in opening meme phaseIn post 333, Bell wrote:Okay, who do you think is mafia?In post 332, Iconeum wrote:i really think ur reaching here, bellIn post 331, Bell wrote:Based on our interactions.
You asked me to point out where you were lying, then asked me to point out where you were reaching and then asked me to point out how reaching made you mafia.
![]()
See your initial vote and explanation for reachiness.
i've already readIn post 336, Datisi wrote:did you read gaem
so i have actually read this 1v1 between you and datisiIn post 329, Bell wrote:Tbh, kinda.In post 328, Datisi wrote:do you think that i am being reachy in a scummy manner?
In post 340, Iconeum wrote:so i have actually read this 1v1 between you and datisiIn post 329, Bell wrote:Tbh, kinda.In post 328, Datisi wrote:do you think that i am being reachy in a scummy manner?
it wouldn't hurt you to explain your stance
if you say datisi is reaching in a scummy fashion, you should easily be able to quote said posts where you are reading this
In post 343, Iconeum wrote:
i'm getting goosebumps from your 1v1 and i'm not sure which one of you is causing it
You’re reaching because that wasn’t what I was doing. See: post 146. I can’t figure out how to make a link to it.In post 136, Datisi wrote:In post 62, Bell wrote:My vote was serious. AMA.In post 68, Bell wrote:Seems a little watchy.@umlaut
this strikes me as "wow look me i am solving i have reads wow how do you do fellow townies"
gaving typed that out i now see i could just say lamist but i prefer "how do you do fellow townies"
so datisi sees you do stuff and makes a conclusion, you say it's the wrong conclusion therefore datisi = scumIn post 346, Bell wrote:You’re reaching because that wasn’t what I was doing
Code: Select all
[post]146[/post]