Open 794 Pick Your Power X/Y (finished)


User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1027
Joined: August 25, 2020

Post Post #375 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:38 am

Post by Grumpy Cat »

Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
User avatar
Datisi
Datisi
it/he
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
User avatar
User avatar
Datisi
it/he
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
Posts: 26012
Joined: March 28, 2019
Pronoun: it/he
Location: Croatia

Post Post #376 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 1:48 am

Post by Datisi »

i feel like half the time grumpy is seriously trying to solve the game while the other half they're trying their hardest to get scumread and i'm finding it very amusing
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
~M
User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1027
Joined: August 25, 2020

Post Post #377 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 2:01 am

Post by Grumpy Cat »

No
User avatar
Something_Smart
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
User avatar
User avatar
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
Somewhat_Balanced
Posts: 23130
Joined: November 17, 2015
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Upstate New York

Post Post #378 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 3:19 am

Post by Something_Smart »

In post 373, Datisi wrote:you don't follow my train of thought or...? i mean seemed to be starting a push for certain players over others based on draft, no?
But, she's not arguing to use (2), and it's not true that (1) and (3) are direct consequences of (2)-- they include the assumption that scum intentionally avoided doubling up.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
User avatar
Datisi
Datisi
it/he
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
User avatar
User avatar
Datisi
it/he
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
Posts: 26012
Joined: March 28, 2019
Pronoun: it/he
Location: Croatia

Post Post #379 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 3:28 am

Post by Datisi »

In post 378, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 373, Datisi wrote:you don't follow my train of thought or...? i mean seemed to be starting a push for certain players over others based on draft, no?
But, she's not arguing to use (2), and it's not true that (1) and (3) are direct consequences of (2)-- they include the assumption that scum intentionally avoided doubling up.
well that's my point, (2) seems like the most ~valid~ data point and the fact that it's being somewhat "overlooked" in favour of the other two in this scenario (a lot of small numbers picked, top three in draft being rather large numbers etc) is making me think there may be ~convenient bias~ in which slots she does or doesn't prefer

i know scum intentionally avoid doubling up with each other. but scum have no control over whether they're going to end up doubling with other townies, hence why i'm saying that "bias against going for the bottom three who tripled up and picked number 4" is making me go hmm

also yes i get she's not speaking in absolutes and that we must never vote those slots ever but ehh
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
~M
User avatar
Datisi
Datisi
it/he
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
User avatar
User avatar
Datisi
it/he
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
Drawn from Memory

Drawn from Memory<br><img src=https://i.imgur.com/rUdtw5m.gif>
Posts: 26012
Joined: March 28, 2019
Pronoun: it/he
Location: Croatia

Post Post #380 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 3:29 am

Post by Datisi »

ugh i feel like i have too many "null but kinda scummy" slots right now

hoopla, do you have any non-mech reads/hot takes to offer

this game needs more content

maybe i'm not the one to talk when i keep dragging mech on

sigh
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
~M
User avatar
Marquis
Marquis
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Marquis
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11342
Joined: June 23, 2013
Location: EST (–5)

Post Post #381 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 4:01 am

Post by Marquis »

I should have posted this yesterday but
V/LA until Thurs
link in bio
User avatar
Something_Smart
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
User avatar
User avatar
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
Somewhat_Balanced
Posts: 23130
Joined: November 17, 2015
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Upstate New York

Post Post #382 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 4:21 am

Post by Something_Smart »

In post 379, Datisi wrote:well that's my point, (2) seems like the most ~valid~ data point and the fact that it's being somewhat "overlooked" in favour of the other two in this scenario (a lot of small numbers picked, top three in draft being rather large numbers etc) is making me think there may be ~convenient bias~ in which slots she does or doesn't prefer
(2) is statistically meaningless without similar data for town.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
User avatar
Umlaut
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Umlaut
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6053
Joined: August 3, 2016
Location: Somewhere out there

Post Post #383 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 6:48 am

Post by Umlaut »

Oh cool, more pages.

Page 9:
Page 11:
  • I don't think anyone actually wants to play this game as a pure logic puzzle and I don't think there's any need to repeatedly say "let's not do that" as if there were any risk of it happening.
  • Re. , I'm reluctant to take Clover's question seriously as a towntell. Town got burned badly in a recent game I was in by a less experienced player doing just that (asking a lot of "questions like these" about mechanics and whether scum could talk during the day etc., purely for the sake of looking town).
  • DrDoolittle wifoming the setup analysis bothers me. Like in , do you actually think that's something scum would do purely to throw us off, vs. the chance to claim an additional PR (and potentially deprive town of one as well)? I just don't see how you can actually think this is a thing scum decides to do.
    Considers
    sure,
    actually does
    no.
Okay I caught up with my last catch-up so now it's time for lunch! At this rate I'm sure I'll be fully caught-up any week now.
“There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say, ‘There are two kinds of people in this world: those who say there are two kinds of people in this world,
and the other kind,
’ and those who
don’t
say. Well, then there’s me.” — J.R. “Bob” Dobbs
User avatar
davesaz
davesaz
He
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
davesaz
He
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12557
Joined: August 24, 2014
Pronoun: He
Location: Socially distant

Post Post #384 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 6:56 am

Post by davesaz »

Official Vote Count 1.4


Something_Smart(3) - Gypyx, Hoopla, Umlaut
Umlaut(3) - DrDolittle, Grumpy Cat, Datisi
Dr Dolittle(2) - word321, iamausername
Gypyx(1) - Marquis
Iconeum(1) - Green Crayons
Marquis(1) - the worst

Not Voting(3) - Clover Ebi, Something_Smart, Iconeum
With 14 alive, elimination requires 8 votes

Day ends in (expired on 2020-09-13 23:00:00)

Mod notes: Marquis is V/LA until 9/3
Wanna play Minecraft with your ms friends? Check out the minecraft thread, or the channel on discord
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Clover Ebi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 841
Joined: December 26, 2019

Post Post #385 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 7:07 am

Post by Clover Ebi »

Word/Worst/Hoopla/Grumpy Cat are all good townreads for me. We've posted 16 pages in 2 days and it's super hard for me to not blur past the words to fully get my thoughts in so I might just deal with the fact I'll forever be behind so I can get my thoughts on a page. Reading all this is exhausting and I've played mostly larges! VOTE: Green Crayon
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Clover Ebi
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Clover Ebi
Goon
Goon
Posts: 841
Joined: December 26, 2019

Post Post #386 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 7:08 am

Post by Clover Ebi »

I want to scumread DrDolittle but my reasoning goes against my style of play so I'll just wait and see if other people see what I see or if I'm going bonkers.
User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Grumpy Cat
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1027
Joined: August 25, 2020

Post Post #387 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 7:25 am

Post by Grumpy Cat »

In post 383, Umlaut wrote:Town got burned badly in a recent game I was in by a less experienced player doing just that (asking a lot of "questions like these" about mechanics and whether scum could talk during the day etc., purely for the sake of looking town).
Link pl0x
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #388 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:05 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 276, Iconeum wrote:
In post 125, Green Crayons wrote:Seems like a particularly confident push over very little. Feels like early scum distancing
yeah sure
weird thing to bring up on page 12
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #389 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 302, DrDolittle wrote:I like, just don't agree with this, especially this line:
"the main players that should be off the table today is the trio of word/crayons/iamausername. the odds of one of these players being scum is so low we'd need overwhelming evidence to take a shot there."
what's the AI point you're making here?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #390 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:18 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 373, Datisi wrote:you don't follow my train of thought or...? i mean seemed to be starting a push for certain players over others based on draft, no?
<ignores >

what is happening
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #391 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:21 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 383, Umlaut wrote:Oh cool, more pages.
is this just how you're going to play?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #392 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:23 am

Post by Green Crayons »

feel like one of DDL, S_S, and Datisi gotta be scum enjoying the free conversation generator that is Hoopla's number theory
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #393 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:23 am

Post by Green Crayons »

feel like one of DDL, S_S, and Datisi gotta be scum enjoying the free conversation generator that is Hoopla's number theory
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #394 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:24 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 385, Clover Ebi wrote:Word/Worst/Hoopla/Grumpy Cat are all good townreads for me. We've posted 16 pages in 2 days and it's super hard for me to not blur past the words to fully get my thoughts in so I might just deal with the fact I'll forever be behind so I can get my thoughts on a page. Reading all this is exhausting and I've played mostly larges! VOTE: Green Crayon
the stated reasons for this vote are wrong and also exceptionally uninteresting, so let's slot you as town for now
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Something_Smart
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
User avatar
User avatar
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
Somewhat_Balanced
Posts: 23130
Joined: November 17, 2015
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Upstate New York

Post Post #395 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:26 am

Post by Something_Smart »

In post 393, Green Crayons wrote:feel like one of DDL, S_S, and Datisi gotta be scum enjoying the free conversation generator that is Hoopla's number theory
I don't really follow that. Why are scum looking to start conversations more than town?
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #396 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:26 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 391, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 383, Umlaut wrote:Oh cool, more pages.
is this just how you're going to play?
Umlaut isn't the only one who does catch up posts (hi yes I do it too but with multiple posts rather than a single big one), but damn the format just feels like a scum indicative tactic here.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #397 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:27 am

Post by Green Crayons »

^^^ mech/theory is great scum convo material because it allows them to be productive without doing the hard part of making up cases against town

double bonus if you can suspect a player because they put forward a theory you can poke holes in
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Something_Smart
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
User avatar
User avatar
Something_Smart
He/him
Somewhat_Balanced
Somewhat_Balanced
Posts: 23130
Joined: November 17, 2015
Pronoun: He/him
Location: Upstate New York

Post Post #398 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:33 am

Post by Something_Smart »

In post 397, Green Crayons wrote:^^^ mech/theory is great scum convo material because it allows them to be productive without doing the hard part of making up cases against town
I don't agree with this. We must have a different definition of "productive," because I don't see why scum would try to be productive to the town wincon, and discussing mechanics (usually) isn't productive to the scum wincon.

I also don't think that making up cases against town is really that hard, nor is it necessary as scum if you don't talk about mechanics.
It's always the same. When you fire that first shot, no matter how right you feel, you have no idea who's going to die. You don't know whose children are going to scream and burn. How many hearts will be broken. How many lives shattered. How much blood will spill, until everybody does what they're always going to have to do from the very beginning... SIT DOWN AND TALK!
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #399 (ISO) » Tue Sep 01, 2020 10:34 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 396, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 391, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 383, Umlaut wrote:Oh cool, more pages.
is this just how you're going to play?
Umlaut isn't the only one who does catch up posts (hi yes I do it too but with multiple posts rather than a single big one), but damn the format just feels like a scum indicative tactic here.
Just so I'm not a complete ass, here, because Umlaut has suggested IRL reasons for not being as active as he might otherwise be (so the inactivity itself isn't AI). There's a sense of Umlaut's catch-up posts are more like detached observations rather than any attempt to really engage. No engagement is safer for scum because that never requires devolving into argument where you might actually have to put rubber to the road and evict a towns person based on the back of your bad reasons.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Return to “Completed Open Games”