Secret Hitler! (round two!) [7/7] (liberals win!)

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:28 pm

Ok

Usually we do votes for SE

I want SE on taylor

dsjstr · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:29 pm

Absolutely not!! then she makes you chancellor and we lose

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:29 pm

id probably nom RC since alduk and ari are term limited

shiki · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:29 pm

shouldn't there have been at least one blue left, and that's accounting for one other pair lying,

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:30 pm

we could also SE RC and then nom me. id kinda prefer that, but idrc. i think those are the two choices.

Aristophanes · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:30 pm

I understand but also want the nom.

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:31 pm

In post 278, shiki wrote:shouldn't there have been at least one blue left, and that's accounting for one other pair lying,

we shuffled. i think the remaining cards are shuffled prior to dealing anything. so the leftovers are in random places in the new deck.

@datisi, is that right?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:31 pm

The deck reset: previous picks have little bearing on this pick

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:31 pm

In post 280, Aristophanes wrote:I understand but also want the nom.

you cant be nommed, youre term limited.

shiki · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:31 pm

oh i was working from the assumption that it is shuffled with the two remaining set aside from last game

Aristophanes · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:32 pm

Datisi · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:32 pm

In post 281, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
In post 278, shiki wrote:shouldn't there have been at least one blue left, and that's accounting for one other pair lying,
we shuffled. i think the remaining cards are shuffled prior to dealing anything. so the leftovers are in random places in the new deck.
@datisi, is that right?

correct.

ruleset wrote:If there are fewer than three tiles remaining in the Policy deck at the end of a Legislative Session, shuffle them with the Discard pile to create a new Policy deck.

Grumpy Cat · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:32 pm

Huh MAYBE there are fascists in the so called townbloc and people who are being shelved as concensus fascist are town???

just a thought

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:32 pm

From my point of view 2 is likely liberal and I as a matter of course don't try to play around hitler nominations; I want TSwizzle SE and then she can pick who she wants

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:33 pm

its possible, but those being shelved would have to make some pro-lib arguments to convince anyone

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:33 pm

7 can we talk

Alduskkel · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:33 pm

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:33 pm

Sorry for calling people by their seats

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:34 pm

im ok with that. im pretty confident RC is lib, but i am somewhat scared of getting burned.

dsjstr · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:34 pm

In post 292, RadiantCowbells wrote:Sorry for calling people by their seats

<3

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:34 pm

quiet, 5

shiki · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:34 pm

i still think we should keep him out of gov't, as well as dsjstr

dsjstr · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:35 pm

In post 295, Tayl0r Swift wrote:quiet, 5

</3

Alduskkel · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:35 pm

anyone have any convincing arguments that taylor or RC are fascist, other than that they're coordinated?

Tayl0r Swift · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Thu Sep 03, 2020 1:35 pm

In post 296, shiki wrote:i still think we should keep him out of gov't, as well as dsjstr

who is this him?