Large Normal 229 | Manatee's Musical Mafia | Game Over

ISO · Post Post #3300 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 4:56 pm

sorry for no Content today the vibe wasn't lining up

Titus · Post Post #3301 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 4:57 pm

I get why people are wagoning NPOM, but what distinguishes him from me? My lack of effort is very much time oriented and I am putting my vote in places to try and be useful.

@NPOM, why haven't you collaborated with those people? Who do you think they are?

NoPowerOverMe · Post Post #3302 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 5:25 pm

I have. Anyone not on my scum list

Titus · Post Post #3303 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 5:43 pm

How have you collaborated? Sheeping =/= collaboration.

NoPowerOverMe · Post Post #3304 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 6:31 pm

I try not to come to quick conclusions especially in large games.

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #3305 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 6:43 pm

A50, why did you create so much confusion with faking to be the target of a gunsmith?

shellyc · Post Post #3306 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:49 pm

In post 3299, NoPowerOverMe wrote:It's pretty early so don't hold me to this list, but this would be my solve if forced at this point:

Stanley/Almost50/Marshmallow Marshall/ralph217/Glitch

IMO Glitch's vague PR claim is quite town to me. why would scum not just claim a solid PR? And Siteflaking semi-cleared them

MM claimed vigi which is self-confirmable. what is this solve smh

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #3307 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:55 pm

In post 3306, shellyc wrote:And Siteflaking semi-cleared them

What?

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #3308 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:56 pm

In post 3307, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 3306, shellyc wrote:And Siteflaking semi-cleared them
What?

Siteflake claimed some kind of PR that semi-cleared Glitch.

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #3309 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:56 pm

In post 3308, JacksonVirgo wrote:
In post 3307, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 3306, shellyc wrote:And Siteflaking semi-cleared them
What?
Siteflake claimed some kind of PR that semi-cleared Glitch.

They never said specifics

NorwegianboyEE · Post Post #3310 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 7:59 pm

Oh, i misread that. I thought they claimed that "because Glitch siteflaked from the site they're semi-cleared"
Lol i'm stupid and got confused.

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #3311 (ISO) » Sat Sep 05, 2020 8:02 pm

In post 3310, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Oh, i misread that. I thought they claimed that "because Glitch siteflaked from the site they're semi-cleared"
Lol i'm stupid and got confused.

Oh lol.

But back to the semi-clear. If Glitch flips wolf, Siteflake (the player

) is almost 100% town. I doubt scum would save their buddy this hard.

Glitch · Post Post #3312 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 12:19 am

What are JVs thoughts on NPOM?

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #3313 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 12:26 am

In post 3312, Glitch wrote:What are JVs thoughts on NPOM?

I cannot tell if you're asking someone else to ask what my thoughts are or asking me in a weird way.

JacksonVirgo · Post Post #3314 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 12:27 am

NPOM was townie D1 but has seriously just fell flat today. I'll give a more detailed answer soon as I'm busy rn

Fwesnid · Post Post #3315 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 1:29 am

MM is still scum here and that's coming from someone no longer in a cc with them.
Though I do understand why it's better to not keep moving votes back and forth on them.

VOTE: stan1ey

Npom's solve is roughly where I'm at. Looter instead of ralph.

superbowl9 · Post Post #3316 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 2:47 am

In post 3305, NorwegianboyEE wrote:A50, why did you create so much confusion with faking to be the target of a gunsmith?

Not to be rude but it wasnt very confusing

superbowl9 · Post Post #3317 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 2:53 am

In post 3259, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Titus has hopped on my wagon, talked about what was Normal and what wasn't, and then got off the wagon. That's scummy IIoA

Since we clearly do not know what IIoA is I will let you know:

PSAs are not IIoA.

Irrelevant (or relevant) information is not IIoA.

IIoA is when you replace

analysis

with information. Think about it in terms of observations and conclusions. It's not IIoA to make an observation, but it is when you replace conclusions you should be making with solely the information.

Titus · Post Post #3318 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:30 am

In post 3308, JacksonVirgo wrote:
In post 3307, NorwegianboyEE wrote:
In post 3306, shellyc wrote:And Siteflaking semi-cleared them
What?
Siteflake claimed some kind of PR that semi-cleared Glitch.

So great, Glitch and flaking are scum together.

Titus · Post Post #3319 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:32 am

In post 3304, NoPowerOverMe wrote:I try not to come to quick conclusions especially in large games.

That doesn't answer who you've collaborated with. I am not a big early game fan either. That doesn't mean I tolerate people claiming they can work with others without proving it.

Hiraki · Post Post #3320 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:43 am

In post 3301, Titus wrote:I get why people are wagoning NPOM, but what distinguishes him from me? My lack of effort is very much time oriented and I am putting my vote in places to try and be useful.

@NPOM, why haven't you collaborated with those people? Who do you think they are?

NPOM has the worst read progression in the game

I can go into it but I'm phone posting for the next day so you'll have to be patient

Marshmallow Marshall · Post Post #3321 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 4:57 am

@mod

the 3271 votecount says Glitch has 4 votes, but lists 6 voters... looks like a

glitch

to me
...ok I'll see myself out

~~

In post 3270, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 3254, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:What are your reads?
i dont have any

sorry to disappoint

I find it suddenly tempting to shoot you tonight... give us something at least lol, you can't be completely readless. Else why would you have voted this game? You're going down and down into the scumreads hell.

In post 3274, Ydrasse wrote:....i still feel fine with my vote where it is tbh..........

Same, but can you explain why

you

feel that way?

Marshmallow Marshall · Post Post #3322 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:01 am

In post 3315, Fwesnid wrote:MM is still scum here and that's coming from someone no longer in a cc with them.
Though I do understand why it's better to not keep moving votes back and forth on them.

VOTE: stan1ey

Npom's solve is roughly where I'm at. Looter instead of ralph.

I'll shoot tonight. That solves my slot and confirms you.

In post 3317, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 3259, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:Titus has hopped on my wagon, talked about what was Normal and what wasn't, and then got off the wagon. That's scummy IIoA
Since we clearly do not know what IIoA is I will let you know:

PSAs are not IIoA.

Irrelevant (or relevant) information is not IIoA.

IIoA is when you replace
analysis
with information. Think about it in terms of observations and conclusions. It's not IIoA to make an observation, but it is when you replace conclusions you should be making with solely the information.

I don't know what a PSA is, but I do know that what Titus did was IIoA. Instead of trying to advance things by reasoning, she just said "this isn't Normal" and put her vote on me. Call it "fake useful activity" if "IIoA" bothers you here, but I think it fits the definition of IIoA: saying mechanical stuff without giving any conclusions or reads based on them, and just sitting on the current top wagon that happens to be very lucrative for scum.

superbowl9 · Post Post #3323 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:05 am

In post 3322, Marshmallow Marshall wrote:I don't know what a PSA is, but I do know that what Titus did was IIoA. Instead of trying to advance things by reasoning, she just said "this isn't Normal" and put her vote on me. Call it "fake useful activity" if "IIoA" bothers you here, but I think it fits the definition of IIoA: saying mechanical stuff without giving any conclusions or reads based on them, and just sitting on the current top wagon that happens to be very lucrative for scum.

PSA = public service announcement. This is the definition of NOT IIoA. If someone asks a mechanical question it's just pro-town to answer that question correctly. She voted you for obviously the same reason everyone else voted you, there was no reason for anyone to explain their vote after the fwes thing happened. She didn't use these answers to justify anything she was doing, and providing these answers is actually marginally useful activity in that scenario

superbowl9 · Post Post #3324 (ISO) » Sun Sep 06, 2020 5:07 am

In post 3257, superbowl9 wrote:
In post 3252, DrDolittle wrote:
In post 3250, superbowl9 wrote:I think dolittle deserves to go today over stan actually assuming glitch is legit, I think stan will provide more AI stuff as it goes on and certain stuff is making me question my SR
i told you im not planning to effort at this stage of the game for a variety of reasons
Stuff like this I say 1 passive sentence about how I scumread you and you appear from the ether to throw an excuse at me. Didn't help your case with this one

VOTE: DoLittle