Newbie 2031 - The Wild Hunt (End!)

shellyc · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:40 pm

In post 591, Egix96 wrote:Also also, why did you say this before?

I like to gutread people
only this time my gut is wrong

pedit: why does my crumb mean nothing when it increases the cred of my claim
also im not getting limmed today, jailkeeper is resolvable by nightphase so lets actually solve, and worsty was interested in my elim clearly by tunnelling me

shellyc · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:41 pm

In post 615, shellyc wrote:I kinda rushed to claim it to be fair

shouldn’t have claimed but I was only half awake and woke up seeing the bold E-1 and it made me freak out so I claimed it

response to 624

Satisfaction · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:42 pm

One more day. One more opportunity for you to wriggle and writhe and come up with more ways to stall.

You crumb is 100% useless. Mechanically what are you even pretending that it accomplishes in this situation?

Satisfaction · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:43 pm

Uh. No. That’s the post I was talking about. You can’t use your lie as evidence that you haven’t lied.

shellyc · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:43 pm

satisfaction powerwolf?

idk how you still want to push it on me
I give you the option to a) unvote because night actions can clearly solve this or b) counterclaim me

shellyc · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:44 pm

In post 628, Satisfaction wrote:You can’t use your lie as evidence that you haven’t lied.

explain

ISO · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:45 pm

In post 622, Satisfaction wrote:1) Your crumb means nothing. Why would a crumb ever matter in a situation where other roles haven’t already been claimed.

that's the only time it's worth crumbing, because if you're counter-claimed it adds credibility to your claim?

In post 622, Satisfaction wrote:2) TW was never excited for your elimination. Not since it seriously hit the table.

i was

In post 624, Satisfaction wrote:Saying the claim was a spur of the moment decision is also a lie. Shelly already gave intent to claim and “self towncase”. I’m not interested in hearing either from her.

this is pretty semantic. bluntly: your solve is wrong. you might be right on shelly. i know you're wrong on me, but for sake of argument, whatever. assume you're wrong on at least one of us - where are the rest of your reads at?

ISO · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:46 pm

In post 629, shellyc wrote:satisfaction powerwolf?

it occurred to me as well but i still think he reads sincere, just like, mind mendingly confbiased. if he doesn't have any other reads his alignment will get really obvious when one/both of us flip, assuming we're t/t.

shellyc · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:47 pm

SATIS I GIVE YOU 10 SECONDS - COUNTERCLAIM OR GET BACK TO SOLVING THE GAME

shellyc · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:48 pm

In post 632, the worst wrote:it occurred to me as well but i still think he reads sincere, just like, mind mendingly confbiased. if he doesn't have any other reads his alignment will get really obvious when one/both of us flip, assuming we're t/t.

hmmmmm

like it occured to me that scum can just stfu and nightkill me theres no need to shade me

shellyc · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:49 pm

satis if you don't CC you think the setup is B1 (tracker + TFN) which is the only setup that i dont get cc'd immediately? and you still stand by your solve? which is wrong?

ISO · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:56 pm

In post 634, shellyc wrote:
In post 632, the worst wrote:it occurred to me as well but i still think he reads sincere, just like, mind mendingly confbiased. if he doesn't have any other reads his alignment will get really obvious when one/both of us flip, assuming we're t/t.
hmmmmm

like it occured to me that scum can just stfu and nightkill me theres no need to shade me

yeeeah

shellyc · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:57 pm

fluffposting alert

satisfactions sudden silence is concerning

Satisfaction · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:58 pm

I think that pushing for the elimination of a prodded lurker while we are waiting on potential counterclaims seems reckless.

Pedit: nice of you to self-label your fluff for us.

shellyc · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 6:58 pm

thats why I was considering egix

satis what is your read on egix

Satisfaction · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:00 pm

Is it?

shellyc · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:00 pm

im fine with worsty as well, ive stated my limpool a lot of times

death tunnelling the solve as me/worsty is wrong and does not get us anywhere. you're wrong on me

ISO · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:00 pm

knowing when to be reckless and when not to be is one of the most fun parts of mafia!

pedit: please don't elim me, that's uncool.

shellyc · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:00 pm

In post 640, Satisfaction wrote:Is it?

PT slip??

what does this refer to

shellyc · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:01 pm

In post 642, the worst wrote:pedit: please don't elim me, that's uncool.

Shelly dayvigs worsty

request granted

shellyc · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:02 pm

omg is that a pt slip and the solve is worst + satisfaction

*holds breath*

shellyc · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:04 pm

*holds breath*

where did worst and satis go
wait
is that REALLY A PT SLIP?????????

Satisfaction · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:06 pm

One of the first goals of propaganda: wear down the earnest.

Satisfaction · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:06 pm

It was a direct response to the post right above it, pal.

Satisfaction · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:07 pm

I’m not the one who pretends to not understand how previews work.