of course i do, but i dont feel the need to comment on everything that is happening especially if i dont get anything from it and sometimes i prefer to see where a discussion leads.In post 446, Thestatusquo wrote:And now you've spent 2 more posts on it instead of actually discussing the game in a meaningful way.
There were 2 whole pages between
And thisIn post 398, duppin wrote:could you elaborate on this? i am mainly interested in your association readsIn post 380, PJ. wrote:To be most clear; I think 2 of murder/outworld/duppin are scum and 1 of nora/chicken katsu/blitzo are scumand 6 whole pages between the first and your previous comment on the game.In post 434, duppin wrote:well it would be very helpful if you could elaborate on the association reads you made because they seem rather weird to meIn post 428, PJ. wrote:I already claimed scum bro..
Also it isn't actively unhelpful. 3 scum in those 6. Probably could narrow it down more, but that'd require effort.
Do you have nothing else to say about 8 pages of content?
ive aleady stated that while I think the initial scumread on kasu was pretty bad I think the townpass for his "anger" is questionable and not in the sense that it necessarily makes kasu more scummy, but more so that I think its odd for pooky to look up his meta and seeing he just seems to be aggressive by nature but still trying to give a townpass for it. I think my issue is perhaps not so much with the read itself but the fact that it feels like he is trying to push the read
i also dislike UneducatedGuesser's post but I can't quite explain what it is because when I read it the logic seems relatively solid actually