In post 117, AuroraDash wrote:Regarding TheDuke, it doesn't look like anybody voted for him until after he made his one post. I think it looked like a random vote -- like the rest of us made -- with some humour thrown in, rather than a reaction to anything.
Salsabil: Does the green text mean anything, or are you using it to make your posts look nice? I'm just curious.
no no, it doesn't mean anything I just love colors, so, decide to use different colored texts in different day thread (only, if I will alive!)
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.
I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.
I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)
Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.
Titus can be seen in previous games saying that 'meta is garbage'.
But in this game when it's convenient for her it can be brought up and is no longer garbage. It's 'weak' now, but still suddenly worth bringing up in the conversation.
In post 176, Titus wrote:Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.
Well i'm not really being defensive, more like aggressive.
Because i'm quite certain you're bad.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 181, Zurel wrote:I have a very strong feeling that I'm misunderstanding what lynchbaiting means. Can someone please explain? Thank you.
Lynchbait is a player, typically town that acts in a very scummy or clueless manner. And is thus an typical player scum would attempt to push as a elimination.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Don't worry Titus, i can explain how the game works to the newbies once ur gone.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
In post 179, Trendall wrote:Titus can be seen in previous games saying that 'meta is garbage'.
But in this game when it's convenient for her it can be brought up and is no longer garbage. It's 'weak' now, but still suddenly worth bringing up in the conversation.
In post 187, Trendall wrote:So you're telling us that your own argument is invalid?
The meta part only. Some people love meta. I don't. I was just specifically asked if my read was meta.
You literally are calling your own argument invalid. Meaning you actually admit i'm town. Good stuff.
As for my play in this game i don't believe you've seen enough to justify your read on me and the way you placed your vote.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
You are being ridiculous Titus.
I've detailed countless reasons why your push on me isn't genuine, and you're still just arguing with Trendall about this meta shit.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
You said you believed this person to be mafia because he was a mafia in a prior game. I would understand you voting him because of his meta or something. Yet you voted Norway instead, with a reasoning that I cannot see. If you would explain why, that would be nice, thank you.
I was guessing the reason behind Looter's RVS post in the post you quoted.
I originally voted Norway for his only scum deal in absolutes post. That itself is an absolute. That combined with his LAMIST post for defending lynchbait left me confident enough to vote. (LAMIST stands for look at me I am so town.)
Norway then shading me for voting L minus 1 during my catchup and getting all defensive leave me confident enough to vote there.
This is why Norway is scum.
@Norway, I am not arguing with Trendall but explaining. He's confused in good faith. You aren't.
It's good to know you're spewing Trendall as town.
Norwe is spontaneous, has a stream-of-consciouness posting style, usually posts on catch-ups by commenting on past pages posts, gets rather fired up in certain moments in games, is relatively as playful as me in games and likes casual shitposting
Generally when people think an argument is invalid, they don't then go on to say that argument out loud, because what would be the possible town-sided motivation for presenting invalid arguments?
In post 197, Trendall wrote:Generally when people think an argument is invalid, they don't then go on to say that argument out loud, because what would be the possible town-sided motivation for presenting invalid arguments?
I'm not remotely confused, thanks.
I was specifically asked if the meta matched in 165. Generally that is correct.
I just love colors, so, decide to use different colored texts in different day thread 
(only, if I will alive!) 
