do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 251, Gamma Emerald wrote:with the fact bugspray was just there and I have intented, TSC has 5 people against them rn
are you trying to get them to claim? Are you trying to get them to claim without actually asking them to claim? Are you trying to lynch them here and now?
I’m letting them know the stakes.
That's not an answer at all. You're being ridiculously noncommital here despite trying to appear like you're actually pushing TSC.
Do you want to lynch them or not? Do you want them to claim or not? I have specifically said that I don't want to lynch them right now, you have to be open about what you're trying to do.
In post 279, Umlaut wrote:The Caro-Kann (1. e4 c6) is in fact a respectable opening played at the top levels of chess, though very different in character from the Sicilian (1. e4 c5).
Are you directly supporting spammers? Also, why the hell has mafiascum
In post 279, Umlaut wrote:The Caro-Kann (1. e4 c6) is in fact a respectable opening played at the top levels of chess, though very different in character from the Sicilian (1. e4 c5).
Are you directly supporting spammers? Also, why the hell has mafiascum
We were literally passing time waiting for your slot to do anything to prove that you don't deserve this wagon
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 42, Kyoko Kirigiri~ wrote:No action is by itself a direct or conclusive scum tell unless direct scum claims or actions that are based on elements in-game that change the natural probability assumptions in the game
Yep. They are discussing how to scumhunt and trying to disguise it as scumhunting. Have fun reading!
-Black
VOTE: slime this might be e1 this might be hammer I don't care which one it is
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
In post 274, superbowl9 wrote:Oh I thought you were like making a half-serious point, my b
no worries
by the way, i remembered what i wanted to ask you yesterday, you were scumreading bugs at the time i thought they were plainly acting townie so i'm interested in a deeper elaboration (if there is one) on that read and / or your current read on them
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 291, bugspray wrote:todo: check out ythan and gamma emerald partner equity
i would like to know what the branworms are saying behind this
that gamma rep out is ew. like not ai, just ew.
In post 307, The Slime Collective wrote:Black is much better in creating cases that I am. There is no point in me talking about below-average opening of Gamma, the fact that his ISO contains scumreading without pushing and in overal not very deep analysis or his horrible push to our slot. I will mention it to Black and hopefully he can make a good case from it resulting into people casting VOTE: Gamma.
~Victor Hugo slime
so, black is here now... this is happening... when?
like i dislike this post because it seems like... way too easy? gives a feeling of picking a random townie who isn't doing much / is kinda yeet-bait who's pushing on their wagon and making a vague "case" on them
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 361, Datisi wrote:that gamma rep out is ew. like not ai, just ew.
Was thinking this and I'm glad someone else said it first so that I can just quote in agreement
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
thank you for agreeing with me about that, now can you answer a question i had for you like one line above that?
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I have not done that case yet but I remember seeing shadowy moves and I'm literally on my way to a funeral to get misgendered by a not insignificant portion of my extended family so it'll come
later
if ever but I saw some strong subtle associations between the slots and think that ythan makes a few posts that ping me as having some kind of info about alignment in other slots and that can't mean Masons in this setup
MY PRONOUNS ARE THEY/THEM
do not assume my posts follow coherency they do not imagine that every time i post i put half of my knowledge into a clone and then the clone murders me
i'm reading kyoko's posts at the end of page 13 and i think i'm warming up to her being >rand town
like at first when i saw 319 i thought of it to be scummy because i saw the quoted posts without much addition and it felt like a busywork/IIoA post, and then i scrolled further down lol. it kinda got me thinking, and i realized that's often the vibe that i was getting from her posts, because of their writing style / formatting they were giving me a busywork-y vibe, which now seems pretty incorrect/biased
@kyoko, do you have reads? now i see you're explaining what you do and don't like in other players, but i'm wondering when/if those translate to a ~read~? mostly asking in reference to the post where you said that not everything you like or don't like translates to a town/scumread
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
@bugs, sorry to hear that :/ life comes first, take care.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
In post 200, Datisi wrote:i'm finding ythan's ~annoyance~ (idk if that's the right word here but i'm using it) quoting posts that go unanswered gut townie
ythan, do you have any townreads?
datisi uses curious words sometimes, and I'm sure this can be totally player dependant but there's a lot of little adjectives and question marks in his posts that seem designed to make whatever he is saying weaker and therefore non-commital. Like here he is calling ythan's posts 'gut' townie and I find the placing of the word 'gut' to be artificially put there. In the page before it he adds a question mark to a sentence that was supposed to be affirmative. There are many other examples of this behaviour. Having said that I don't disagree with the stance on ythan so there's that.
yeah, i'm calling them gut townie because i don't actually
think
they're townie - there's nothing "logically" townie about a person passively-aggressively quoting their own unanswered question, because that's a decently easy thing for scum to fake. that's exactly why it's gut townie: i understand this action is relatively easily fakeable and not hard evidence for anything, but my gut/subconscious/intuition/whatever is telling me that it's not fake, that it's a genuine townie reaction. and as A Gut Player(tm), that's p much the basis of how i work.
similar thing with punctuation - i have a certain way of speaking when giving my thoughts on something, and i feel like that's the best way for it to be translated into writing. don't mistake it for being non-committal, i'm standing behind every post i make.
do you think it's scummy? how's it playing into your read on me?
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
Which sort of non-content do you not find scum indicative?
-Black
I think quoting a player who replaced out with a direct question that plenty of people have already answered before might make people have serious concerns about your alignment
Yup, I think this is scumtelling. the new player was posting in the current page so there's no way slime didn't see that, which means he probably asked a question knowing he'll only get an answer after the game is over. also the question itself was leading nowhere surely.
In post 200, Datisi wrote:i'm finding ythan's ~annoyance~ (idk if that's the right word here but i'm using it) quoting posts that go unanswered gut townie
ythan, do you have any townreads?
datisi uses curious words sometimes, and I'm sure this can be totally player dependant but there's a lot of little adjectives and question marks in his posts that seem designed to make whatever he is saying weaker and therefore non-commital. Like here he is calling ythan's posts 'gut' townie and I find the placing of the word 'gut' to be artificially put there. In the page before it he adds a question mark to a sentence that was supposed to be affirmative. There are many other examples of this behaviour. Having said that I don't disagree with the stance on ythan so there's that.
yeah, i'm calling them gut townie because i don't actually
think
they're townie - there's nothing "logically" townie about a person passively-aggressively quoting their own unanswered question, because that's a decently easy thing for scum to fake. that's exactly why it's gut townie: i understand this action is relatively easily fakeable and not hard evidence for anything, but my gut/subconscious/intuition/whatever is telling me that it's not fake, that it's a genuine townie reaction. and as A Gut Player(tm), that's p much the basis of how i work.
similar thing with punctuation - i have a certain way of speaking when giving my thoughts on something, and i feel like that's the best way for it to be translated into writing. don't mistake it for being non-committal, i'm standing behind every post i make.
do you think it's scummy? how's it playing into your read on me?
I think it can be scummy. nobody expects you to have an objective townread based on real evidence, of course all you're doing here comes down to using intuition, so using the word 'gut' does nothing but diminish the strength of the thing you're saying. there are other examples of you doing something that I interpreted as exactly that but if you want I can elaborate tomorrow. this feeling I'm getting from your posts is weakening my townread of your slot. I've been liking the points you're making while disliking the way you're making them
(if/when you can.)
