In post 2949, Bell wrote:toe be cleare, it'se note ae goode faithe waye toe followe ite when used thise waye ine thise context. Ie wonder ife Ie shoulde be givinge ye scume pointes fore thate, bute Nahe ye asked whiche ise the responsible thinge toe doe.
I have a principled obligation not use self-meta to manipulate you. So I'm giving you my word that you can take this information in anyway you see fit, and this post is meant to solve you.
ok so lot of WIFOM here is what I'm gettingIn post 2921, Titus wrote:One, his buddy could vouch for him, we went over this yesterday. This problem you raise is why he's a town lean and a predictable person to attack.In post 2917, SirCakez wrote:Ok but what if Haschel just didn't want to risk being seen?In post 2915, Titus wrote:Yeah. I'm not dead. No extra kill.In post 2914, SirCakez wrote:can you elaborate on this? haschel is pretty scummyIn post 2901, Titus wrote:I expected scum to push on Haschel. Both you and MC did.In post 2900, OutWorldER wrote:elaborateIn post 2898, Titus wrote:That being said, Outer might be scum too.
If we all account for where we are and Haschel doesn't fit in anywhere then obv he did the kill
To argue he's scum would mean my presence blocked him from getting a kill off because of no alibi (two rooms with one town).
It's possible I disrupted that.
Because of that prossibility, he's only a lean town. I want to see more. Especially on his Bell read. I feel like that request has dragged on.
scummyIn post 2942, Bell wrote:I'me lurkinge thise oute
Soe, like, ife you're expectinge me toe towne spewe ine ye olde english, ain'te happeninge.
In post 2953, Blade Dancer wrote:@Cakez, It's not wifom to believe the most likely scenario. Could I be wrong? Sure. That doesn't make believing the most likely scenario wifom.
@Taly, what is it you want me to see exactly?
Commentary on these reads in particular,In post 2858, Taly wrote:: Eveyrbody is giving me a hard time withMurderMurder, it feels. It gives me flashbacks toMerchant's Daughterover 1 year ago whereKrazywas hard scumread by all the slots I townread, but I townreadKrazyand ALL OF TOWN doubtcasted my read there, and we lost in elo because I was right aboutKrazyall along. viewtopic.php?f=56&t=78670
No, I don't understand why people thinkMurderis scum. If anyone does, I want them to talk to me like I'm a 5 year old and explain it.
I townreadMurderbecause he went from sus'ing my lukewarm POV on his slot to taking that as an opportunity to work with me when most of the plist wanted him eliminated. 1705 2004 2024 2033 2322 2371 He was transparent about the fact that he couldn't give a confident solve D1. 1710 2249 I believe him because his actions reflect someone trying to solve the game whether it is to townside with a player or give full context and ideas to their thoughts on mechanic in regards to gamestate. 1691 and 1692 He even asserted his own ideas above my own when he felt it necessary. 2347 2404 I feel likeMurder-scum would've changed tune the secondAkarinjumped onto him and I don't think he's actively tried to absolve or downplay the suspicion on him.
His disposition towards me reminds me of how he handledInfinityinStudent Council. Slight paranoia, very, very strongly wanting to work with a slot despite this. I think this isMurder'smethod to gamesolving that I personally vibe with. viewtopic.php?f=83&t=84987
Unless I'm literally loony-toons level stupid this game andMurder-scum is tailing a strong, red-herring associative to my neck (which I don't think is true because he's not a braindead sheep), I'm still feeling good aboutMurderbeing town. If any of you think I'm misled, I damn-well expect something RESEMBLING of a good retort because I've not seen one.
: This man gets my sympathies, I felt the volume that they 1v1'd MULTIPLE SLOTS D1 is something I see from town more often than scum. I made a lot of my points about them in my D1 ISO 1671 and other thanBattle MageAkarintownflip as a potential thing to look at for interactions, I don't see a reason to doubt my initial analysis. I'm solid on them as town.
My only vex withBMat the moment is that I feel that they're very cautious D2 and I don't have context on how he came to this behavior from when he was strong on thatTituslim EoD1.
I can see his change of heart happening being in a PT withTitus. But neither could've ended up inElectrical, since people going there had to relocate, from my understanding. Ultimately, I like thatBM/Titusseem to be working in good faith but I'm iffy becauseBMis still putting her at arm's length BUT is going with her solve at the same time.
: She never really responded to my points on her near EoD1 but it's not that I opened D2 demanding that of her. I think she's a bit easier to read as her thoughts aren't hyperfocused onTitusBMnow, I don't know what has led her to change onBM.
I don't really want to pry either. 2850 implies she knows something nobody else does and she's playing it smartly to try and figure out the thread first. OK, that makes her prediction posts 2640 2661 a lot more sound.
...shit...
After posts like 2620 2850, 221 has given me several new potential interpretations toTitus'gameplay right now and I'm OK with her being in the townbin.
Overall, I'm a bit frustrated withTitusbut I trust they're actually solving the game here. I'm frustrated because they think I forced my posting EoD1 as scum 2823 and I want them to work with me if they think I'm misled onMurder2821.[
lolIn post 2942, Bell wrote:I'me lurkinge thise oute
Soe, like, ife you're expectinge me toe towne spewe ine ye olde english, ain'te happeninge.
Just an fyi that it'd be much appreciated if you did something similar.Titus wrote:Ugh a wall... I will get to this asap
VOTE: BELLIn post 2960, OutWorldER wrote:VOTE: Bell
rereading, sheeping titus's case on him plus he fits with the things I find murder scummy for. i can compromise on this.
WOW THATS BADIn post 2963, xRECKONERx wrote:VOTE: BELLIn post 2960, OutWorldER wrote:VOTE: Bell
rereading, sheeping titus's case on him plus he fits with the things I find murder scummy for. i can compromise on this.
In post 2968, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i think we should kill reck
he clearly doesnt want us to have a plan for tonight by attempting quickhammer,
he opposes planning out room movements.
even when its obvious as hell that room planning worked by limiting the scum NK he still sticks to his ridiculous assertion that room planning is a bad idea.
like how many anti-town actions does this guy have to do before we send him out an airlock?
VOTE: Reck
btw we still need to plan out room movements so every1 post where you need to go to complete your tasks and i will try to organize it into groups of 3.
just in the next day or two and i will spreadsheet shit out.
exodia zero imbalance.
this post restriction is just dumb and I doubt shea even checks he's literally just inflicting suffering for no reason.
In post 2967, MURDERCAT wrote:WOW THATS BADIn post 2963, xRECKONERx wrote:VOTE: BELLIn post 2960, OutWorldER wrote:VOTE: Bell
rereading, sheeping titus's case on him plus he fits with the things I find murder scummy for. i can compromise on this.
CAN WE CHILL OUT, WE DON'T EVEN HAVE A PLAN FOR TONIGHT
In post 2969, OutWorldER wrote:oh yeah
, so i'm heading to cafeteria again, both to leash anybody there, as well as in case I fail my task today.i have no task after this
VOTE: Reck I can get on board with this.
In post 2973, OutWorldER wrote:i think Bell takes Akarin's task, Reck gets limmed, is fine plan for today, da?
In post 2950, Bell wrote:In post 2949, Bell wrote:toe be cleare, it'se note ae goode faithe waye toe followe ite when used thise waye ine thise context. Ie wonder ife Ie shoulde be givinge ye scume pointes fore thate, bute Nahe ye asked whiche ise the responsible thinge toe doe.
:(e