Yes that's exactly why i'm voting them right now, because they are my scum partner.In post 1597, Flavor Leaf wrote:Norwegian/Mistyx/Akarin my hero solve.
You're good at this.
Yes that's exactly why i'm voting them right now, because they are my scum partner.In post 1597, Flavor Leaf wrote:Norwegian/Mistyx/Akarin my hero solve.
TGP has a vote that is just as strong as anybody else's.In post 1598, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Well when i'm thinking pocket then i usually imagine sucking up for stronger players. And TGP doesn't have much sway most of the time, at least not in this game.
More about the wagons on day 1.In post 1601, Ramcius wrote:Norwe, it seems like you missed my question, so I'll ask again - what do you expect to learn from Akarin's wagon/flip?
In post 1600, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yes that's exactly why i'm voting them right now, because they are my scum partner.In post 1597, Flavor Leaf wrote:Norwegian/Mistyx/Akarin my hero solve.
You're good at this.
What happened to this btw?In post 1080, Ramcius wrote:I'll be blunt, this game has way too much AtE and meta shit for me to actually do anything. Trying to engage people, who are scumreading me isn't working either, so I'm good to end this day, I'm pretty sure one of Akarin/TSQ is scum and I'd go with Akarin first
because things that can be town indicative can also be antitown? AtE, specifically.In post 1585, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:So you tr me because of my reaction to Ico, then in what world does that make it “antitown”?In post 1019, TheGoldenParadox wrote:her going off on Ico changed.In post 1011, Thestatusquo wrote:I don't understand what has changed between now and when you were scum leaning. She's been playing this way the entire time. This also goes back to my question about why you were being so meek earlier which I don't think you answered.In post 1008, TheGoldenParadox wrote:yeah, agree with shea that ico is town here.
i hate to read her like this, but the way she is going off on people who scumread her this game makes me suspect nancy's town too, although i hate that that kind of behavior earns nancy a townread because it's toxic and antitown.
me being meek? i don't understand
i- are you one to talk here??In post 1586, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Don’t you think this is a bit of an over reaction to the start of D2? I’d think if Akarin and Ram were aligned, he wouldn’t want to go out of his way to paint such a ginormous target on him. I’d view this as somewhere between neutral to possibly even anti-associative.In post 1545, TheGoldenParadox wrote:alright, this is the post that makes me believe the earlier fight between TSQ and Ramcius was TvS. Saying "1 lurker flip is enough" attempts to take attention off of people who should have attention on them, and makes it easy to defend people who aren't particularly defensible. i'm not a fan of it at all, and when i've seen it i think it's done far more often from scum trying to take the heat off of their buddies than town genuinely being against flipping lurkers.
VOTE: akarin couple reasons i'm voting akarin instead of ramcius right now - first, a scum flip from her incriminates ramcius far more than vice versa largely because of this post. second, i haven't seen much in the way of town posts from akarin, and i think ramcius will be sorted by other flips eventually in a way that akarin will not because of lack of interactions.
TGP makes bad pushes as town, so you have no way how to evaluate it if he isn’t.
it's not bad. even if you end up being town, this is a surface level comment.In post 1608, NorwegianboyEE wrote:FL. You're hard to read so i'll just ignore this push from you and hope that Ico and Nancy will see it for how bad it truly is.
As I said to TGP, I don't see a reason to pressure Akarin right now as she promised to be more active D2 and thus I expect to have a chance to sort her. TSQ is still a scum tho, but no one agrees with me, so there's no point in voting himIn post 1606, NorwegianboyEE wrote:What happened to this btw?In post 1080, Ramcius wrote:I'll be blunt, this game has way too much AtE and meta shit for me to actually do anything. Trying to engage people, who are scumreading me isn't working either, so I'm good to end this day, I'm pretty sure one of Akarin/TSQ is scum and I'd go with Akarin first
You seem to have changed your opinion on Akarin completely today.
What an impatient guy
I don't know yet. I'm just voting them for reactions and later wagon analyzis. And it's also PoE because i'm townreading most other slots yesterday, so if they aren't scum then that means no scum was wagoned at all yesterday and that'd be good information to have.In post 1613, Ramcius wrote:What do you learn about D1 wagons from Akarin's flip?
So, you prefer to vote a lurk slot with no real plan instead of trying to go after some more active slot that can be actually engaged?In post 1616, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't know yet. I'm just voting them for reactions and later wagon analyzis. And it's also PoE because i'm townreading most other slots yesterday, so if they aren't scum then that means no scum was wagoned at all yesterday and that'd be good information to have.In post 1613, Ramcius wrote:What do you learn about D1 wagons from Akarin's flip?
I disagree. This has nothing to do with your solving. I'm pushing you to help ME solve, which you are completely shutting downIn post 1614, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@FLavour
No. It's ignoring. Big difference.
You could be town or scum, i just don't care atm because i want to solve you later.
If so then considering your reaction and switch from previous stance yesterday to not wanting to vote Akarin because "they promised not to lurk" then i'd be voting you. But there is generally more consensus for Akarin.In post 1617, Ramcius wrote:So, you prefer to vote a lurk slot with no real plan instead of trying to go after some more active slot that can be actually engaged?In post 1616, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't know yet. I'm just voting them for reactions and later wagon analyzis. And it's also PoE because i'm townreading most other slots yesterday, so if they aren't scum then that means no scum was wagoned at all yesterday and that'd be good information to have.In post 1613, Ramcius wrote:What do you learn about D1 wagons from Akarin's flip?
How am i shutting it down? I'm only defending myself.In post 1618, Flavor Leaf wrote:I disagree. This has nothing to do with your solving. I'm pushing you to help ME solve, which you are completely shutting downIn post 1614, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@FLavour
No. It's ignoring. Big difference.
You could be town or scum, i just don't care atm because i want to solve you later.
I think you could convince TSQ to vote me and maybe TGP with his idea of me and Akarin being scumbuddies, so that would be 3 votes on me, while you have 2 on Akarin right now.In post 1619, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1617, Ramcius wrote:So, you prefer to vote a lurk slot with no real plan instead of trying to go after some more active slot that can be actually engaged?In post 1616, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't know yet. I'm just voting them for reactions and later wagon analyzis. And it's also PoE because i'm townreading most other slots yesterday, so if they aren't scum then that means no scum was wagoned at all yesterday and that'd be good information to have.In post 1613, Ramcius wrote:What do you learn about D1 wagons from Akarin's flip?
No, you're saying you're ignoringIn post 1620, NorwegianboyEE wrote:How am i shutting it down? I'm only defending myself.In post 1618, Flavor Leaf wrote:I disagree. This has nothing to do with your solving. I'm pushing you to help ME solve, which you are completely shutting downIn post 1614, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@FLavour
No. It's ignoring. Big difference.
You could be town or scum, i just don't care atm because i want to solve you later.
Are you saying i should be glad and willingly help you make the game eliminate me because it helps you solve?
If Akarin is scum then that would look worse for you though.In post 1622, Ramcius wrote:I think you could convince TSQ to vote me and maybe TGP with his idea of me and Akarin being scumbuddies, so that would be 3 votes on me, while you have 2 on Akarin right now.In post 1619, NorwegianboyEE wrote:In post 1617, Ramcius wrote:So, you prefer to vote a lurk slot with no real plan instead of trying to go after some more active slot that can be actually engaged?In post 1616, NorwegianboyEE wrote:I don't know yet. I'm just voting them for reactions and later wagon analyzis. And it's also PoE because i'm townreading most other slots yesterday, so if they aren't scum then that means no scum was wagoned at all yesterday and that'd be good information to have.In post 1613, Ramcius wrote:What do you learn about D1 wagons from Akarin's flip?