i don't understand the idea that KT would be a policy hang. this is maybe just a terminology disagreement but as far as the votes yesterday go, KT was far more suspicious than HUB in my view. not that HUB isn't suspicious but day 1 forcing a late VT claim isn't *explicitly* anti-town even if it was a miselim.
there still are things i don't like about HUB's activity -- forcing a wagon on a player playing to his meta (ok, one game i could find, but even that was at least showing they weren't acting "weird" by their standards), and the fact that it was at least partially responsible for the behavior that got FT policy hanged (there's no reason you *had* to respond to everything FT said).
it's like, yes, i can see how the behavior FT got hanged for was "suspicious" but i don't like how this behavior was egged on by people. like a scum entrapment thing. especially because like, even *i* could tell that's how FT would likely respond to pressure, and if i could tell, there's a very good chance other people could tell.
VOTE: KittyTacky
//
i want to go to the final count
- flow trap [5]:
Ydrasse
, Happy Unbirthday Boon, Vasex, KittyTacky
, team rocket queen [HAMMER]
- Vasex [1]: floo
- KittyTacky [1]: FBJim
- Not voting [2]: fairyprincess69 (Battle Mage),
flow trap
reads -
BM - 1/3 town. this is actually more based on FP's slot than anything else (especially them pushing back when i was close to tunneling ydrasse, who's obviously confirmed town) though i appreciate taking over the game with people VLA. also if D1 miselim was because of policy/votebait, i wouldn't stay on No Vote if i was scum - just seems like an inherently "notable" thing to do that has no real upside (admittedly this could be cuz of them dropping out in the first place).
nothing is a done deal but KT seems like a likely d2 hang and i already voted - assuming him for a sec (and leaving aside Battle Mage which I mentioned above) leaves one of
HUB
Vasex
TRQ
floo
me
HUB: (1/2 scum) the big logorrhea mess which led to FT's mishang was HUB/KT's doing - HUB for the actual hard push posting, and KT for the e-1. KT's vote was more *inherently* suspicious as i suspected earlier but i still consider HUB among the "worst" there- when someone just mass posts, i can absolutely see a tactic of constantly prodding them, pushing each response and then calling for a rope because all the posts are making the gamestate too confusing.
Vasex: (1/3 scum) calling for activity level/lurking ropes when you've got one of the highest activity levels is a bit self-serving though i actually kind of like it. feels more like "i'm town and townies should be acting like me" than anything calculated.
that said, calling for activity level ropes when you've got one of the highest activity levels might just be simple self-serving CYA, *especially* past day 1. their FT vote also didn't stick out, and i mean this in a *bad* way. one of the biggest problems i have with the KT-HUB pairing is that it would put both of them in a semi-exposed position for a fairly elim-bait wagon which seemed risky. one player as the e-1 vote and one as a sheep vote makes a lot more sense than one player as the e-1 and one as the hard pusher. out of all the FT votes theirs was by far the most sheep-y.
TRQ: (1/2 town) holding for prod. i think their hammer was at worst NAI, though, and *hesitating* on the hammer (and not in a way that struck me as fake) made me feel better. also find it hard to match them up with another scum candidate in a way that makes sense to me.
floo: (1/3 town): activity level/lurking, eh. like the FT vote, hanging based on that feels like a fallback option when we don't have better ideas. also agree that if they are town, they'd be the most likely counterwagon candidate.
me: (???): well, if it were me, for miselim-ing a e-1 bait player, i think two scum on the wagon makes more sense than one-on one-off, since the elim-bait status makes justifying any vote theoretically easier. but hey.
it's a little strange because in isolation i consider HUB a better candidate but Vasex/KT as a more likely pairing. this is entirely based on my probably bad intuition of likely voting behaviors and i absolutely need to review the thread/interactions more.