i'll be back on Monday, don't know if my other head will be around
-seCret
What case on BB?In post 3495, seCret hYdra wrote:talk to me? why are we scum?
why is my case on BB bad? Why is theirs good?
-seCret
do you think / have experience that gypyx is more likely to lurk as scum?In post 3488, Bridgeburners wrote:also: gypyx has been around. i see he's literally on site *right now*
why hasn't he posted in like a week again?
~ skitter
cheese and pancettaIn post 3507, PenguinPower wrote:What type of sandwich
let's say it's mainly their crap progression on a number of slots (sechyd, peta), reluctance to explain said progression, and their reluctance to even read extremely relevant parts of the game because it seemingly doesn't fit their agendaIn post 3501, PenguinPower wrote:What case on BB?In post 3495, seCret hYdra wrote:talk to me? why are we scum?
why is my case on BB bad? Why is theirs good?
-seCret
There was no other wagon except for BB at the time and I wanted to see what happened instead of hammering BB.In post 3509, Datisi wrote:wh are you voting sechyd, pp?
It's been a very very long and shitty week at work. I'll be around over the weekend/sunday more
I don’t really understand the propositionIn post 3516, PenguinPower wrote:how about this. I set a time for one hour and place a vote on BB - if NM hammers during that time ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
if he doesn't - i remove my vote.
if you're right, YAY!
if you're wrong, DEAD!
fair?
basically we roll the dice as to if nm comes online during that hour. if he does and you flip town i deathtunnel dats. if nm doesn't come online, i remove my vote and meme for the rest of the day while voting the hydra.In post 3518, Bridgeburners wrote:I don’t really understand the propositionIn post 3516, PenguinPower wrote:how about this. I set a time for one hour and place a vote on BB - if NM hammers during that time ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
if he doesn't - i remove my vote.
if you're right, YAY!
if you're wrong, DEAD!
fair?
-QB
Probably bridges, but I'd like to give Menalque the benefit of the doubt that he might just be having a bad game. These two are extremely capable, if they're town they might be able to turn it around.In post 3506, PenguinPower wrote:S_s - who you want to vote right now?
eh with regard to hYdra it's like, he can't really fake scumhunt yet so he spits out whatever he can to seem active but itsn't really trying to solve the game and there won't be a logic to what he's saying. for seCret, admittedly experience there is thin, we were scum together in one game but it's like, here his bursts of posting feel performative in a way, it's geared toward showy emotion and hitting a few stray comment on things every time he shows up, itjust seems more driven toward making stray attacks than analysis. not the best explanation but it's what i have, can try to go into detail later, tired and sore from work todayIn post 3491, Schiavetto wrote:elaborate?In post 3334, petapan wrote:something_smart - very likely town both by mechanics and play, has actual reads, isn't playing like a dead man walking because of his claim
penguinpower - feels real, can't point to a particular moment but when he makes content posts it looks serious and scumhunt-y
bridgeburners - honestly, at this point, no one seems that likely to be partnered with them. just doesn't seem that likely to be a hit imo
schiavetto - has faded but was all right early, still reasonably not partnered with notscience. starting to angle toawrd bridgeburners yesterday wasnt great though
not_mafia - showing flashes of actually giving a shit which is town for him
datisi - idk, still not feeling his withdrawal from the game, but reaction to me yesterday was okay, no obvious opportunism. might have been saved by infinity but maybe not if there's a jk
isis - down here mainly because i don't have a strong reason to townread her
secret hydra - don't think the shirou interactions are clearing andboth heads are kind of playing like i'd expect from them as scum, has a feeling of inauthenticness to some of their posts