I'm pretty sure T3 is scum and his partners are ineffective players.In post 1224, WhemeStar wrote:Do you guys think the top 2 wagons day 1 are both scum?
I also dont think titus is scum here
PP Dunn T3 is my solve.
I'm pretty sure T3 is scum and his partners are ineffective players.In post 1224, WhemeStar wrote:Do you guys think the top 2 wagons day 1 are both scum?
I also dont think titus is scum here
^ This is one of those rare instances we get both alignments of a read to look back on. It's also in RVS I get that, a bunch of votes were between the 2 there:
^ I like this post, like, it reads as town to me, like "hey don't get modkilled" With an 18p game, wouldn't scum be rooting for mod kills to make their lives easier? I also believe that discussion would mainly benefit mafia, like another flavor game I've played, so by stopping the convo completely, there's no more hints of info, and I TR this.In post 34, Titus wrote:I thought this too but I can't see any further positive than can come from further speculation and the risk of modkill is too high. So for now, no flavorclaim discussion if you don't mind.In post 29, samantha97 wrote:the no flavorclaim rule makes me wonder if flavor just confirms people as town, or if there's some kind of hunting situation like dark/light fairy from the last boon game
^I like the "wanting to get out of RVS" probably not the best way to get out of it, I normally tend to push on someone random for their "terrible entrance" then they take it seriously, and we move on, there's better ways to get out of RVS than going "hey, lets get on with this" Not sure why you yourself didn't comment on that Romance wagon, but I understand trying to grab town's attention, like "hey we got 4 votes super quickly, give thoughts" to clarify, I don't think I really sr this post, reminds me of my thoughts in a game... which also consist of a lot of behind the scenes yelling lmao.In post 49, Titus wrote:Someone say they feel I am town or scum so we can start to break RVS.
Either that or comment on Romance wagon which is a gun to my head wagon on scum.
^ This has to be a towny response, like my response to "convince me you're town" is "I know I'm town, so let's find scum" like, I'm feeling my read on Titus is basically me going "that's how I am when I'm town" lmao this is probably going to be a useless read then.. BUT I do genuinely like these lines from Titus. Like, "Not going to towncase myself. I'm going to hunt scum. Deal with it." feels like town going "no thanks, I'd rather find scum" which is exactly how I feel town would react here.In post 105, Titus wrote:Not going to towncase myself. I'm going to hunt scum. Deal with it.In post 101, Bear HUGS wrote:who cares about that. convince me you are town.In post 100, Titus wrote:There is a vote feature.In post 98, Bear HUGS wrote:Ok Titus is scum. convince me otherwise.
^ By this point in the game, Bear didn't really have in depth posts (like what they're giving now) so I can see the thought process behind Titus's vote- I understand it was a real read based on RVS, but I feel like this is a reasonable vote given the context.In post 146, Titus wrote:Bear, it's expected your hydra will have many posts. That's not an in depth secret, nor is Romance claiming your volume suggests something about your alignment.
I find it odd you're objecting to Romance but you're quiet on Willow.
VOTE: Bear hydra
^ This is exactly how I feel when a strong argument between people feels TvT to me, I also skim it, cause I don't care to read paragraphs on paragraphs of people going after each other, especially when it's only the 2 voices. I also like the fact Titus outed a possible sr and admitted it was a weak reason, like, thoughts like that are usually what I keep in my head, and jot down in my notes, again, same thought process as me when I'm town. If Titus is scum I'm gonna cry here cause I wanna say they're town due to them acting just like me as town, but what if this is actually I act like scum as town ahhhhhhIn post 448, Titus wrote:I think VFP v Willow is T v T (skimmed it) but VFP could be scum by voting pattern (weak reason due to low data).
I'm content letting them both live today and ignoring their back and forth because it is tedious "no you" comments.
^ This is in response to the post right above this, Willow feels super hostile here in 449,Feels like they're just trying to pick a fight (exactly why I don't read the 1v1 fights) however, Titus's response to this hostile "don't say anything if you're not gonna read it" feels like a super towny approach. It's very calm, and feels like it's trying to diffuse the situation, which is good for town. I mean, why not just let 2 people blow up and waste their 200 posts if you're scum? I LOVED this response from Titus though.In post 453, Titus wrote:I draw my conclusions based on how players react to each other, rather than individual posts where I can. I have seen this type of posting before and it's usually not S v S, and that would elicit a certain reaction from other slots (no one in particular) I am not seeing.In post 449, willow1 wrote:don't call it tvt if you're not going to read it, blame it on both of us if you want but that is exactly what I was trying to avoid and drawing a conclusion without reading it is awful
steer clear if you want but jesus
I don't need to read every post in minute detail to get a jist of the behavior, so I won't.
You and I will have conflict because we process the game in different ways.
That's ok. You'll be useful to me to talk about emotion and tone later to check my reads.
It takes a village to solve the game for a reason.
I'm perfectly willing to discuss your reads on other slots, particularly t3 and Dunn.The game still is slow. The volume of your Willow fight is not moving the game forward. Engage elsewhere.In post 452, VFP wrote:On a side note as I go to bed, I want to take back my comment of this game being slow 3 pages ago, I was wrong.
^ I understand not really reading into substitutions and all, but Titus has had minimal interactions with/about Bell all game (yes I know bell didn't say a lot) but if you haven't talked about someone, why have a line like this?? Yes I also liked Bell's exit post, but like it feels like you're defending Bell here off the 1 post, and you haven't even commented specifically off it. "Town bell would leave us with something, scum wouldn't" It's like, he just flipped scum and definitely left something, so that point just got proven wrong. But it's also like, Bell probably knew, just subbing out would leave that slot as confirmed scum, and normally people don't wreck their game then sub. Your response feels very "Bell town, just leave bell alone" without and actual substance to that read.In post 723, Titus wrote:While this is true of Bell, his exit post counteracts the lack of effort. Scum!Bell would just exit. Town!Bell left content. Him subbing out alone is not AI as we all have RL sometimes.In post 722, Bamboozle wrote:Bell should be the flip. I don't like to address the hippocrates in the room as much as the next guy, but Bell has tonnes of motivation and will to play the game as town, while he really has to force himself to post as scum. Him not having the willpower to dedicate some time to this game is very scum-indicative.
-Bam
^This is a weird post, I just had to highlight it. Like, again, we're defending Bell, but we haven't given a solid reason as to why we think Bell is town other than "Bell posted before subbing, thus Bell town, but the sub isn't AI!!!" Anything related to Bell from Titus is throwing me, this is where I'm like, I understand the fos on Titus, but I can also see the TRs on Titus, I'd like to believe the Towny points outweight the scummy ones. Like, this post is a pretty bold "Bell is flipping town" which is really bold to say, instead of just bussing your scummy partner, HOWEVER, I'd have liked to seen more of a solid reason for why Bell was flipping town, maybe I missed it, but idk.In post 827, Titus wrote:Flip Bell.In post 826, Raya36 wrote:Wait what do you mean by this?In post 822, Titus wrote:Anyone not seeing that this is staged Bell then Noraa flips is out of their minds imo.
Bell flips town.
Flip Noraa.
Noraa flips wrong town.
^ This is where Titus kinda unravels after all the solid "Bell is flipping town!!" but saying stuff like "RMH's death weakens his value" like, what were you trying to say here? this almost feels like a panicked scum going "I could've saved Bell, but RMH isn't doing a good job at all, time to earn town points by hopping on the bus" I'm just overall confused when it comes to where Titus's thought process was/ was going with the Bell read. Like, Titus was trying to push a Raya wagon (the counter to Bell at the time) and it looks like more effort was going to Raya than Bell. All this is where I'm like, My TR on Titus is falling apart, and I would absolutely love for everyone to weigh in on where they're at with Titus. jj going "let's discus raya/titus" without saying a word?? like, There is PLENTY to discuss with Titus. Wheme going "I also dont think titus is scum here" WHY?? YOU HAVE TO EXPLAIN SOMETHING IF YOU WANT IT TO MAKE SENSE TO US - Unless you're scum just trying to ride whatever the popular read is... I HATE lines that call someone town/scum with 0 reason behind them. I literally just skimmed Wheme's ISO in case maybe I was wrong on that previous statement and Wheme had said something. Nope. Nothig from Wheme, just a super dry ISO.In post 1079, Titus wrote:I still think Raya is scum regardless.In post 1075, samantha97 wrote:if robertbell is town, who is mafia?
I know RMH's posting hasn't been good and Retti is almost certainly town.
I really hope I am right on RMH though. It looks less likely to be the case with the self vote.
It really doesn't matter FMPOV if RMH is town, he's still the better play with Retti being obvtown. RMH's death, if town, confirms multiball which creates an interesting dynamic. It also weakens RMH's value. If RMH flips cop, it's unfortunate but still the optimal play as Retti is town. Scum Retti holds his gladiate I think unless his gladiate gates a stronger scum power.
I don't think Titus is scum eitherIn post 1224, WhemeStar wrote:Do you guys think the top 2 wagons day 1 are both scum?
I also dont think titus is scum here
I was told town PP is inactive and scum PP tries to lead the gameIn post 1225, Titus wrote:I'm pretty sure T3 is scum and his partners are ineffective players.In post 1224, WhemeStar wrote:Do you guys think the top 2 wagons day 1 are both scum?
I also dont think titus is scum here
PP Dunn T3 is my solve.
Hearsay meta.In post 1229, WhemeStar wrote:I was told town PP is inactive and scum PP tries to lead the gameIn post 1225, Titus wrote:I'm pretty sure T3 is scum and his partners are ineffective players.In post 1224, WhemeStar wrote:Do you guys think the top 2 wagons day 1 are both scum?
I also dont think titus is scum here
PP Dunn T3 is my solve.
Counterpoint, as much as Raya is my backup.In post 1228, jjh927 wrote:Raya is. I think it was all town on the Raya wagon, so scum could have tried to move pressure away from the Bell wagon and they didn't
You've played with the Peng before though, so why go on what you're told and not on what you know from previous live play?In post 1229, WhemeStar wrote:I was told town PP is inactive and scum PP tries to lead the gameIn post 1225, Titus wrote:I'm pretty sure T3 is scum and his partners are ineffective players.In post 1224, WhemeStar wrote:Do you guys think the top 2 wagons day 1 are both scum?
I also dont think titus is scum here
PP Dunn T3 is my solve.
You're denying it's activity while outright stating he was soft, which is another word for activity.In post 1236, Bear HUGS wrote:Titus,
the meta issue isn't whether Bell-scum can be active. Bell-scum can certainly play an active opening if properly motivated and with sufficient free time.
It's that I've never see Bell-town be that soft on entry - it doesn't take Bell-town energy to look townie so he always looks really townie when he's actually town.
you literally refuted Esoaa's case on bell!scumIn post 1239, jjh927 wrote:Esoaa has been locktown for a long time but I don't remember a particular case
Please elaborate
In post 1238, Titus wrote:You're denying it's activity while outright stating he was soft, which is another word for activity.