DEFCON Mafia 5.0: GAME OVER - NEW AMERICA FORMED

[Cephrir]

And point B being it defense is rather clear as the vote happened right after Nexus pushed Et Al.

:bigredX:

[Titus]

Hey let’s say M’s strategies suck so we don’t have to provide reasoning for what we’re doing << That is what you sound like to me Titus.

How many other people need reasoning?

None.

My reasoning and actions are pretty clear.

[Cephrir]

this conversation is a waste of time and i am done with it

[Titus]

https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... aw_Defense

I don’t think so smiley face Kupo.

I think anything that fits this criteria should be pushed. Does it work always? Of course not. But by pushing I find out if it does or not.

yeah where the fuck are you getting any of that from naked votes???? i guess i'm chainsawing for titus right now too huh? maybe we can make a circle of chainsaws

I think you're actually defending me. I said nothing about et al.

But this talk with M is a waste of time.

[Cephrir]

i suppose i am defending you

here, i'll even make it a chainsaw defense:

VOTE: mognet

[Mognet]

Hey let’s say M’s strategies suck so we don’t have to provide reasoning for what we’re doing << That is what you sound like to me Titus.

How many other people need reasoning?

None.

My reasoning and actions are pretty clear.

Literally just pushed Entity for lack of reasoning Titus.

The difference is they’re actually attempting to be explanation of how they think I am wrong.

A bit stubborn about it and not addressing the original read but I can buy them being town since I townread Marry.

However you’re not even trying to give a reason anymore. It’s all just attack Mognet.

[Mognet]

i suppose i am defending you

here, i'll even make it a chainsaw defense:

VOTE: mognet

Not a chainsaw. You gave reasoning earlier.

Titus is scum everyone.

[The Church of Skitter]

My favorite Cephir post was the one where he told drealmerz "Look man you've got to understand that "you're too stupid to understand my art" just isn't a valid or reasonable respone to criticism."

[Mognet]

My favorite Cephir post was the one where he told drealmerz "Look man you've got to understand that "you're too stupid to understand my art" just isn't a valid or reasonable respone to criticism."

I am sorry? I don’t think a drealmerz is in this game. And attacking the player is not a reasonable response. Then why are you allowing it from Titus instead of asking why she scumreads Nexus?

[The Church of Skitter]

MathBlade is that you?

[The Church of Skitter]

nah it can't be

[Titus]

Hey let’s say M’s strategies suck so we don’t have to provide reasoning for what we’re doing << That is what you sound like to me Titus.

How many other people need reasoning?

None.

My reasoning and actions are pretty clear.

Literally just pushed Entity for lack of reasoning Titus.

The difference is they’re actually attempting to be explanation of how they think I am wrong.

A bit stubborn about it and not addressing the original read but I can buy them being town since I townread Marry.

However you’re not even trying to give a reason anymore. It’s all just attack Mognet.

I'd rather get Nexus, which is where my vote is.
I have repeatedly stated you're anti-town but town.
You have misrepped me claiming I pushed you as scum.
You claimed my entry for this day is somehow a chainsaw.
You have rejected the correct evidence that I provided to you yesterday.
Now, you're telling me to reread when I'm telling you we just need you to shut up and let people hunt.
You're getting in the way.
Stop trying to play superhero.
This town is pretty solid.
I would like to avoid a policy elimination.

[Mognet]

Again I said earlier I will not out who I am or not.

However I did want a laid back game to try to be fun Church Kupo.

Take that how you will.

[Mognet]

Hey let’s say M’s strategies suck so we don’t have to provide reasoning for what we’re doing << That is what you sound like to me Titus.

How many other people need reasoning?

None.

My reasoning and actions are pretty clear.

Literally just pushed Entity for lack of reasoning Titus.

The difference is they’re actually attempting to be explanation of how they think I am wrong.

A bit stubborn about it and not addressing the original read but I can buy them being town since I townread Marry.

However you’re not even trying to give a reason anymore. It’s all just attack Mognet.

I'd rather get Nexus, which is where my vote is.
I have repeatedly stated you're anti-town but town.
You have misrepped me claiming I pushed you as scum.
You claimed my entry for this day is somehow a chainsaw.
You have rejected the correct evidence that I provided to you yesterday.
Now, you're telling me to reread when I'm telling you we just need you to shut up and let people hunt.
You're getting in the way.
Stop trying to play superhero.
This town is pretty solid.
I would like to avoid a policy elimination.

Why do you want Nexus. You have no reasoning in your ISO.
If wanting you to provide reasoning is why I get elimmed you’re next.
I said you pushed me to let you do as you want and to let you be scummy as fuck because Mother’s Day. I already explained that. Stop bringing up points I already addressed.
I saw your evidence and came to the wrong conclusion. Part of being a moogle.
Yes I am getting in the way of a second day of elims without reason and a popularity contest.
Moogles don’t win those.

I am not playing hero I just want you to provide reasoning.
This town is not solid or weak. We have no idea because we’ve had no wagons.
If I die to make you give reasons for reads so fucking be it.

[Et Al]

The vote is the defense.

How do you know?

-S

[Mognet]

The vote is the defense.

How do you know?

-S

Because that’s how that works? I do not follow your question.
A naked vote sans reasoning after Nexus cased you is a defense of you.
The quality of which can be debated, shitty or good,
But if your post after a case is a vote on the person who made a case that’s a defense

[Et Al]

How do you define "defense"?

-S

[Bell]

@Robert, since not many folk have responded to your concern. I'll put my feet up and say that you should only announce a likely guilty result, but not a likely town clear until their wagon grows.

[Bell]

If you guys could avoid speed limming this round unless you're super confident in a flip, I'd appreciate it.

The weekend is almost over and I'll be back to basically posting in the evening and nothing else. It was a good thing that I wasn't around for mastina lim because I might have accidentally derailed it. But this day phase maybe not so much.

[Mognet]

How do you define "defense"?

-S

Any action, words, posts, or other thing, that is in response to a case, post, vote or other action against another player.

Eg SirCakez says or votes Coney Island is scum.

Theme Park could do any of the following to defend Coney Island
>> Explain Coney Island is town because....
>> Vote SirCakez
>> make a post questioning SirCakez’s logic
>> claim a guilty on Cakez
>> Attack SirCakez the player
>> any other action not listed here that makes Coney Island look better or SirCakez look worse

[joqiza]

i feel a bit directionless atm. i ended up reconsidering my StD read cuz i liked their response to the nexus pressure

[Mognet]

How do you define "defense"?

-S

Any action, words, posts, or other thing, that is in response to a case, post, vote or other action against another player.

Eg SirCakez says or votes Coney Island is scum.

Theme Park could do any of the following to defend Coney Island
>> Explain Coney Island is town because....
>> Vote SirCakez
>> make a post questioning SirCakez’s logic
>> claim a guilty on Cakez
>> Attack SirCakez the player
>> any other action not listed here that makes Coney Island look better or SirCakez look worse

To be clear I do not condone the “Attack SirCakez the player”

Come join me on Titus?

[Titus]

i feel a bit directionless atm. i ended up reconsidering my StD read cuz i liked their response to the nexus pressure

This game is likely just the lurkers and slankers.

[joqiza]

hate to break it to you mognet but i'm considering voting nexus instead i feel like he came off a bit worse in the exchange with StD and marry

[joqiza]

i'd initially liked nexus for 373. i felt like the way he followed up on et al was townie. but StD asked him somewhere earlier something like "do you read me as terrorist?" which reminded me that nexus could be working a genuine read here and still be scum, if he's looking for 3P. and it's noticeable that he fixated on the responses to the nightkill, which was performed by the terrorist.