with 9 votes in play, it takes 5 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2021-06-01 17:15:00).
Last edited by Datisi on Tue May 25, 2021 2:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
I will straight up disregard all reason if you have a PR dream again. You can come back and be like, “I dreamt that Locke is a N2 Bulletproof Multitasking Cop and Self-Targeting Doctor,” and I will go, “Okay, Locke kill it is then.”
No I don’t. Last time I had you dead to rights as Scum and you got away because you made others think that because you were willing to engage in spirited fights that you couldn’t possibly be Scum. And then of course your clever fake Claim got you through the Endgame.
Claiming that all of your analysis is going to be surface level is Scummy - I know you can do a lot better than that.
What information would you expect to get at E-1 that you couldn't get at E-2? If I had been forced to claim that would narrow the pool for scum, so that move was at best anti-town.
And again, that vote wasn’t RVS. Not entirely. It’s clear a disagreement is developing between two players at that stage - jumping in between them to stoke the fire a little bit isn’t the Townie thing to do in my view.
In post 429, Andresvmb wrote:And again, that vote wasn’t RVS. Not entirely. It’s clear a disagreement is developing between two players at that stage - jumping in between them to stoke the fire a little bit isn’t the Townie thing to do in my view.
ok i fact checked this
it's not true
their vote was the first one on Sigmund, so not piling on or stoking or anything
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 419, Moongrass wrote:Sigmund's vote of Iconeum was oddly timed if the vote on me was intended to be a reaction test. I'd expect the vote on Iconeum immediately after Iconeum unvoted me, not when Iconeum calls out Sigmund indirectly by asking for my take on it.
So, if it's not a reaction test then it was intended for my elim. At the point Sigmund voted for me I don't believe he had foreseen Iconeum unvoting me mid 1v1.
Andre had put me in his scumpile so there was potential for a quick elim...opportunistic indeed.
In post 419, Moongrass wrote:Sigmund's vote of Iconeum was oddly timed if the vote on me was intended to be a reaction test. I'd expect the vote on Iconeum immediately after Iconeum unvoted me, not when Iconeum calls out Sigmund indirectly by asking for my take on it.
So, if it's not a reaction test then it was intended for my elim. At the point Sigmund voted for me I don't believe he had foreseen Iconeum unvoting me mid 1v1.
Andre had put me in his scumpile so there was potential for a quick elim...opportunistic indeed.
What information would you expect to get at E-1 that you couldn't get at E-2? If I had been forced to claim that would narrow the pool for scum, so that move was at best anti-town.
If you're observant enough to notice when the gamestate is benefitting scum, then it's likely you're playing up this troll business to suit what you do and don't notice.
What information would you expect to get at E-1 that you couldn't get at E-2? If I had been forced to claim that would narrow the pool for scum, so that move was at best anti-town.
lol at claiming e-1 and e-2 are the same thing
I didn't? I'm saying the only difference is you're likely to muck things up at E-1. If I'm not under pressure at E-2 you're not going to get anything more from me at E-1.
In post 431, Iconeum wrote:that statement isn't scummy
it's also not townie
it's a factual statement
nothing more or less, why you wanna fight me over that?
actually, your reluctance to talk to me is pingy
The reason it’s Scummy is because you’re in advance signaling that you’ll be behind Town executions and nobody can fault you for that. That’s why. If I came out and said forgive me but I’m a bad player so if I tunnel Town don’t read into it, you should be suspicious of my intentions. If you see me trying and I get stuff wrong that’s one thing. Openly saying I’m going to suck don’t read into it, I don’t get positive vibes out of that. It’s pretty simple.
In post 429, Andresvmb wrote:And again, that vote wasn’t RVS. Not entirely. It’s clear a disagreement is developing between two players at that stage - jumping in between them to stoke the fire a little bit isn’t the Townie thing to do in my view.
ok i fact checked this
it's not true
their vote was the first one on Sigmund, so not piling on or stoking or anything
Piling onto one side of a heated argument is stoking. I’m sorry you see it differently. I’m clearly not “lying”. That’s just a silly take. Being the first vote is not indicative of anything at all.
If you're observant enough to notice when the gamestate is benefitting scum, then it's likely you're playing up this troll business to suit what you do and don't notice.
In post 284, northsidegal wrote:do you really believe that at this point in the game scum needs to be explicitly posting with some kind of "agenda" rather than just blending in via asking questions?
If you think this is what I am doing why not attempt to interact with me? It is strange that both you and ta vera (at an earlier point) have both been happy to simply say 'UneveN is at/near the bottom of my list!' while making no moves towards sorting me.
to be clear, that question was a rebuttal of moongrass' reason to townread you, not an indication that i scumread you because you're "blending in via just asking questions" or anything.
in response to your question, in general, i'm much more of a believer that the best way to determine if someone is scum is simply to observe them rather than asking a long series of questions or anything. of course, i do ask people questions, but what i'm trying to say is that the idea that because i haven't asked someone any questions that i'm not attempting to sort them is a little off-base.
In post 222, Moongrass wrote:This reminds me of someone...who did turn out to be scum...
Who?
I'm not going to say but they know who they are.
bullshit
now you got caught out and can't answer something you faked in the first place?
VOTE: moongrass
i'll agree with you that that series of posts by moongrass was a little weird, but in general i think that scum basically never just makes up something like that.
In post 321, Moongrass wrote:Andres I think is trying to make a presence but failing miserably, unlikely that's AI, more from him would be appreciated.
I’m not trying to make a presence. If I’m being totally honest, I fell asleep reading this game because a lot of you sound like assholes haha and I didn’t feel like fighting anyone.